Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20100419

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20100419 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 38.84% of octets and 21.16% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.394M 2 10.10M
5 1.478M 8 10.40M
10 1.575M 16 10.93M
50 3.030M 57 17.18M
90 14.50M 59 49.73M
95 26.79M 59 73.93M
99 86.18M 59 181.0M
99.9 395.0M 59 808.8M
99.99 617.2M 119 1.667G
99.999 989.9M 162 2.589G
100 28.88G 163 10.24G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)1.76% 8.810G
Medium (100-1400B)8.53% 42.71G
Large (1401-1500B)89.70% 449.3G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.01% 55.83M
Total100.00% 500.9G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers30.13% 213.6T 29.89% 149.6G 37.18% 9.198M
Encrypted Traffic5.53% 39.19T 5.55% 27.81G 4.11% 1.017M
Measurement4.61% 32.67T 5.54% 27.76G 0.34% 84.18k
Advanced Apps3.29% 23.30T 3.23% 16.19G 3.17% 783.3k
File Sharing3.04% 21.52T 2.99% 14.99G 2.45% 605.8k
Audio/Video0.69% 4.885T 0.66% 3.283G 0.46% 113.9k
Misc0.62% 4.395T 0.65% 3.238G 0.91% 224.5k
Games0.12% 863.5G 0.13% 627.5M 0.17% 41.30k
Unidentified51.98% 368.5T 51.37% 257.2G 51.22% 12.67M
Total100.00% 709.0T 100.00% 500.9G 100.00% 24.74M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
4.347G824419ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
3.630G824415ESnet-East [291]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.798G146410Abilene [11537]Utah Education Net [210]Iperf
1.355G146421Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]Iperf
998.7M150017UIUC [38]Abilene [11537]Iperf
989.8M150019Unknown [32361]U Chicago [160]Iperf
980.2M146410INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Unknown [32361]Iperf
975.9M146414TACCNET [32093]Unknown [32361]Iperf
971.3M150020Argonne [683]U Minnesota GigaPOP [57]Iperf
968.7M150025Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]UNL [7896]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.649G146411Unknown [32440]NCSA [1224]43152 -> 46729
1.376G146420Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]5085 -> 5085
1.339G146419Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]5076 -> 5076
966.1M146416TACCNET [32093]Unknown [32361]5015 -> 5015
911.1M146418Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]SDSC [195]5017 -> 5017
870.2M146415Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]Unknown [32361]5014 -> 5014
863.7M146410Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]U Florida [6356]5017 -> 5017
737.6M146414Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]VANDERBILT [7212]5018 -> 5018
734.8M150010Argonne [683]Unknown [36375]3003 -> 38230
687.7M146412Unknown [32440]TACCNET [32093]48597 -> 50390

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 1.979k.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers41.02% 748.7T 41.58% 984.1G
Encrypted Traffic4.95% 90.40T 5.98% 141.6G
Measurement1.95% 35.63T 1.68% 39.87G
File Sharing1.86% 33.96T 1.54% 36.50G
Advanced Apps1.62% 29.65T 1.45% 34.25G
Misc1.43% 26.14T 3.19% 75.62G
Audio/Video0.75% 13.71T 0.55% 12.93G
Games0.22% 4.057T 0.39% 9.153G
Unidentified46.19% 843.1T 43.63% 1.032T
Total100.00% 1.825P 100.00% 2.367T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
39.45%
0.93%
0.47%
0.16%
---
720.2T
16.99T
8.539T
2.975T
---
40.19%
0.80%
0.37%
0.22%
---
951.3G
18.89G
8.659G
5.279G
Encrypted Traffic
HTTPS
SSH
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.51%
2.13%
0.31%
0.00%
0.00%
---
45.77T
38.79T
5.726T
90.02G
13.05G
---
3.54%
2.05%
0.39%
0.01%
0.00%
---
83.78G
48.43G
9.177G
210.8M
58.28M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
1.89%
0.06%
0.00%
---
34.56T
1.067T
0.000
---
1.34%
0.34%
0.00%
---
31.81G
8.064G
0.000
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Blubster
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.09%
0.36%
0.27%
0.10%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
19.85T
6.571T
5.002T
1.896T
407.1G
95.11G
87.70G
38.42G
9.045G
3.997G
3.174G
1.428G
245.4M
---
0.84%
0.24%
0.31%
0.10%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
19.92G
5.790G
7.410G
2.383G
539.6M
221.0M
122.9M
53.32M
17.55M
32.18M
4.388M
3.999M
291.7k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
IBP
BBFTP
---
1.55%
0.06%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
28.22T
1.067T
249.5G
50.89G
47.00G
16.80G
---
1.36%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.04%
0.00%
---
32.09G
851.2M
293.5M
122.8M
830.9M
63.43M
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
Port 0
X11
MS Windows
AFS
NTP
RTIP
IRC
Telnet
NFS
SOCKS
SNMP
AOL AIM
IDENT
RPC Portmapper
---
0.91%
0.16%
0.11%
0.10%
0.07%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
16.55T
2.964T
2.094T
1.849T
1.313T
386.5G
300.8G
265.0G
136.6G
69.60G
58.80G
50.54G
39.44G
24.78G
21.90G
11.62G
400.7M
---
1.42%
0.87%
0.13%
0.11%
0.07%
0.29%
0.03%
0.15%
0.06%
0.01%
0.02%
0.00%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
33.66G
20.69G
3.017G
2.664G
1.758G
6.790G
630.0M
3.457G
1.512G
351.5M
543.6M
93.82M
176.9M
190.9M
30.13M
46.30M
3.045M
Audio/Video
Real Player
Any-Source Multicast
Windows Media
Backbone Radio
H.323 Signaling
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.46%
0.26%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.357T
4.749T
422.6G
82.14G
49.06G
26.59G
17.79G
12.99G
0.000
---
0.33%
0.19%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.717G
4.543G
386.3M
117.1M
71.32M
37.79M
34.53M
29.11M
0.000
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
Spy Arcade
---
0.13%
0.04%
0.02%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.289T
762.4G
449.2G
356.6G
80.78G
72.42G
46.56G
---
0.16%
0.07%
0.11%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
3.703G
1.750G
2.604G
662.1M
222.5M
127.8M
83.01M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
46.19%
---
843.1T
---
43.63%
---
1.032T
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
1.825P
---
100.00%
---
2.367T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.06% 1.067T 0.34% 8.064G
IGMP[2]0.00% 72.06M 0.00% 1.629M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 220.9G 0.01% 183.7M
TCP[6]87.01% 1.588P 83.24% 1.970T
UDP[17]12.43% 226.8T 15.76% 372.9G
IPv6[41]0.05% 958.5G 0.10% 2.434G
GRE[47]0.10% 1.910T 0.13% 3.144G
ESP[50]0.31% 5.726T 0.39% 9.177G
AX.25[93]0.00% 46.20k 0.00% 700.0
PIM[103]0.00% 2.852G 0.00% 37.12M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.02% 398.6G 0.03% 646.7M
Total100.00% 1.825P 100.00% 2.367T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)38.89% 920.6G
Medium (100-1400B)19.19% 454.2G
Large (1401-1500B)41.91% 992.0G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.00% 56.47M
Total100.00% 2.367T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]97.42% 1.778P 97.30% 2.303T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.16% 3.000T 0.23% 5.561G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 85.03G 0.02% 463.2M
Other2.41% 43.95T 2.44% 57.79G
Total100.00% 1.825P 100.00% 2.367T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.24% 4.467T 0.14% 3.413G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19354.88% 89.07T 4.57% 108.0G
330013.97% 72.54T 2.10% 49.64G
330021.04% 18.96T 0.55% 12.98G
330030.68% 12.44T 0.36% 8.510G
200000.60% 10.90T 0.42% 10.00G