Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20100412

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20100412 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 38.38% of octets and 20.97% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.395M 1 10.10M
5 1.483M 7 10.41M
10 1.584M 14 10.93M
50 3.136M 57 17.32M
90 16.13M 59 50.69M
95 30.69M 59 75.98M
99 92.05M 59 185.3M
99.9 250.5M 59 620.0M
99.99 665.8M 110 1.667G
99.999 1.214G 145 2.717G
100 45.67G 191 10.51G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)1.48% 6.869G
Medium (100-1400B)9.77% 45.27G
Large (1401-1500B)88.74% 411.3G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.02% 69.55M
Total100.00% 463.5G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers33.82% 222.0T 33.59% 155.6G 40.73% 9.331M
Encrypted Traffic6.23% 40.90T 6.38% 29.58G 4.47% 1.023M
Advanced Apps3.05% 20.03T 3.01% 13.93G 3.04% 695.5k
File Sharing2.90% 19.06T 2.87% 13.28G 2.24% 513.9k
Measurement2.80% 18.41T 3.47% 16.08G 0.26% 60.18k
Misc0.62% 4.062T 0.64% 2.987G 0.88% 202.0k
Games0.12% 814.6G 0.13% 584.7M 0.17% 38.36k
Audio/Video0.09% 581.5G 0.09% 410.2M 0.18% 40.27k
Unidentified50.36% 330.5T 49.83% 230.9G 48.03% 11.00M
Total100.00% 656.4T 100.00% 463.5G 100.00% 22.90M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
4.574G824416ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
3.551G824412ESnet-East [291]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.796G146415Abilene [11537]Utah Education Net [210]Iperf
1.261G146414Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]Iperf
984.7M150010Unknown [32361]U Chicago [160]Iperf
980.6M146413Brookhaven National Lab [43]Abilene [11537]Iperf
979.4M146415INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Unknown [32361]Iperf
978.9M150014Argonne [683]U Minnesota GigaPOP [57]Iperf
975.6M146414Boston U [111]Unknown [32361]Iperf
965.2M146416Boston U [111]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.394G146413Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]5090 -> 5090
1.385G146417Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]5043 -> 5043
973.2M146417TACCNET [32093]Unknown [32361]5012 -> 5012
917.9M146410VANDERBILT [7212]Abilene [11537]37595 -> 3002
912.7M145120Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]SDSC [195]5012 -> 5012
843.2M146420Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]U Florida [6356]5019 -> 5019
842.6M146420Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]Unknown [32361]5016 -> 5016
768.1M146411Unknown [32440]TACCNET [32093]60948 -> 50387
722.3M146420Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]VANDERBILT [7212]5016 -> 5016
720.6M146420VANDERBILT [7212]Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]5011 -> 5011

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 1.801k.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers44.19% 755.8T 43.74% 966.6G
Encrypted Traffic5.24% 89.59T 6.24% 137.7G
File Sharing1.76% 30.05T 1.49% 32.83G
Advanced Apps1.51% 25.88T 1.33% 29.36G
Misc1.39% 23.74T 3.26% 72.09G
Measurement1.30% 22.26T 1.40% 30.93G
Audio/Video0.54% 9.222T 0.44% 9.701G
Games0.22% 3.793T 0.40% 8.784G
Unidentified43.85% 750.0T 41.71% 921.7G
Total100.00% 1.710P 100.00% 2.209T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
42.08%
1.27%
0.66%
0.18%
---
719.8T
21.71T
11.28T
3.075T
---
41.95%
1.08%
0.48%
0.24%
---
927.1G
23.79G
10.51G
5.215G
Encrypted Traffic
HTTPS
SSH
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.60%
2.26%
0.37%
0.01%
0.00%
---
44.49T
38.69T
6.293T
105.9G
12.19G
---
3.67%
2.13%
0.42%
0.01%
0.00%
---
81.02G
47.08G
9.386G
243.3M
54.42M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
FastTrack
Gnutella
WinMX
Carracho
Blubster
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
0.98%
0.36%
0.28%
0.09%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
16.81T
6.237T
4.788T
1.532T
413.8G
102.5G
98.10G
45.40G
6.283G
4.327G
3.844G
1.312G
86.79M
---
0.77%
0.25%
0.34%
0.09%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
16.95G
5.500G
7.410G
1.928G
539.3M
142.8M
250.0M
55.20M
12.06M
28.02M
5.383M
2.710M
176.6k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
1.39%
0.06%
0.06%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
23.72T
1.062T
1.038T
43.81G
14.68G
653.8M
---
1.24%
0.04%
0.04%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
27.41G
846.6M
919.6M
111.1M
70.49M
3.501M
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
X11
Port 0
MS Windows
NTP
AFS
RTIP
IRC
NFS
Telnet
SOCKS
SNMP
AOL AIM
IDENT
RPC Portmapper
---
0.91%
0.16%
0.12%
0.07%
0.05%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
15.58T
2.799T
1.992T
1.195T
923.0G
360.8G
266.4G
201.9G
132.1G
84.67G
71.02G
54.97G
25.82G
24.51G
21.13G
8.725G
1.038G
---
1.49%
0.89%
0.14%
0.07%
0.08%
0.29%
0.15%
0.02%
0.06%
0.02%
0.01%
0.02%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
32.98G
19.70G
2.988G
1.605G
1.727G
6.360G
3.387G
533.6M
1.401G
444.1M
112.8M
478.0M
97.26M
189.5M
30.43M
44.42M
4.248M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
1.19%
0.11%
0.00%
---
20.41T
1.848T
262.8k
---
0.90%
0.50%
0.00%
---
19.91G
11.01G
3.600k
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
Backbone Radio
H.323 Signaling
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.28%
0.23%
0.03%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.734T
3.876T
452.8G
62.03G
44.27G
21.68G
15.95G
15.69G
0.000
---
0.20%
0.21%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.473G
4.569G
408.2M
91.79M
60.91M
32.63M
33.55M
30.51M
0.000
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
Spy Arcade
---
0.13%
0.04%
0.02%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.190T
738.9G
412.1G
305.2G
73.32G
51.87G
21.82G
---
0.16%
0.08%
0.12%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.505G
1.698G
2.658G
575.2M
208.7M
84.66M
53.86M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
43.85%
---
750.0T
---
41.71%
---
921.7G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
1.710P
---
100.00%
---
2.209T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.11% 1.848T 0.50% 11.01G
IGMP[2]0.00% 63.24M 0.00% 1.513M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 197.1G 0.01% 162.7M
TCP[6]87.47% 1.496P 83.27% 1.840T
UDP[17]11.87% 203.0T 15.53% 343.2G
IPv6[41]0.06% 986.5G 0.11% 2.414G
GRE[47]0.10% 1.713T 0.14% 3.164G
ESP[50]0.37% 6.293T 0.42% 9.386G
AX.25[93]0.00% 296.5k 0.00% 4.100k
PIM[103]0.00% 2.837G 0.00% 36.92M
IPMP[169]0.00% 262.8k 0.00% 3.600k
Other0.01% 245.9G 0.02% 376.8M
Total100.00% 1.710P 100.00% 2.209T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)38.20% 844.1G
Medium (100-1400B)20.24% 447.3G
Large (1401-1500B)41.56% 918.3G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.00% 91.94M
Total100.00% 2.209T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.60% 1.652P 96.73% 2.137T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.19% 3.195T 0.25% 5.429G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 89.59G 0.02% 505.7M
Other3.21% 54.85T 3.00% 66.32G
Total100.00% 1.710P 100.00% 2.209T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.24% 4.021T 0.14% 3.143G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19355.07% 86.70T 4.61% 101.9G
330013.46% 59.21T 1.83% 40.51G
330021.14% 19.42T 0.60% 13.28G
21800.47% 8.004T 0.35% 7.814G
330030.45% 7.774T 0.24% 5.322G