Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20100405

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20100405 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 38.86% of octets and 21.45% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.392M 2 10.10M
5 1.477M 8 10.39M
10 1.577M 16 10.93M
50 3.070M 57 17.40M
90 15.04M 59 51.82M
95 27.30M 59 81.93M
99 83.25M 59 198.6M
99.9 191.5M 59 601.5M
99.99 689.5M 117 1.621G
99.999 1.394G 127 2.813G
100 28.88G 174 11.08G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)1.48% 6.834G
Medium (100-1400B)9.33% 43.07G
Large (1401-1500B)89.18% 411.6G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.01% 56.40M
Total100.00% 461.6G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers34.73% 227.4T 34.54% 159.4G 41.18% 9.225M
Encrypted Traffic7.38% 48.35T 7.52% 34.69G 4.40% 985.7k
File Sharing3.01% 19.73T 2.97% 13.71G 2.30% 514.8k
Advanced Apps2.96% 19.36T 2.92% 13.47G 3.07% 687.4k
Measurement1.43% 9.332T 1.93% 8.924G 0.22% 48.70k
Misc0.59% 3.877T 0.61% 2.835G 0.90% 201.7k
Games0.11% 699.4G 0.11% 500.1M 0.15% 32.93k
Audio/Video0.10% 648.2G 0.10% 454.8M 0.20% 44.82k
Unidentified49.69% 325.3T 49.30% 227.5G 47.58% 10.65M
Total100.00% 654.8T 100.00% 461.6G 100.00% 22.40M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
4.629G824419ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
3.365G824320ESnet-East [291]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.873G146413Abilene [11537]Utah Education Net [210]Iperf
1.307G146421Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]Iperf
1.165G146420Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]Iperf
992.2M150011Unknown [32361]U Chicago [160]Iperf
983.9M150020Argonne [683]U Minnesota GigaPOP [57]Iperf
976.3M146415Brookhaven National Lab [43]Abilene [11537]Iperf
973.2M146411INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Unknown [32361]Iperf
971.1M146412TACCNET [32093]Unknown [32361]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.425G146418Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]5024 -> 5024
1.332G146419Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]5092 -> 5092
982.3M142010Georgia Institute of Technology [2637]Abilene [11537]47822 -> 3002
959.5M146413TACCNET [32093]Unknown [32361]5010 -> 5010
845.5M142010Abilene [11537]Georgia Institute of Technology [2637]3003 -> 54209
810.6M146420Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]U Florida [6356]5019 -> 5019
799.9M150020Unknown [32361]VANDERBILT [7212]5010 -> 5010
795.1M146411Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]VANDERBILT [7212]5010 -> 5010
785.1M146420Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]Unknown [32361]5014 -> 5014
764.3M146420Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]SDSC [195]5013 -> 5013

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 1.798k.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers43.70% 736.3T 43.19% 929.5G
Encrypted Traffic5.70% 95.99T 6.48% 139.4G
File Sharing1.87% 31.56T 1.58% 34.09G
Misc1.66% 28.05T 3.50% 75.36G
Advanced Apps1.50% 25.32T 1.31% 28.14G
Measurement0.69% 11.58T 0.89% 19.18G
Audio/Video0.52% 8.729T 0.44% 9.548G
Games0.21% 3.581T 0.39% 8.460G
Unidentified44.15% 743.9T 42.21% 908.4G
Total100.00% 1.685P 100.00% 2.152T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
41.03%
1.35%
1.05%
0.27%
---
691.3T
22.68T
17.68T
4.576T
---
41.18%
1.02%
0.71%
0.29%
---
886.2G
21.88G
15.29G
6.147G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.76%
2.61%
0.32%
0.01%
0.00%
---
46.49T
44.00T
5.388T
93.21G
13.37G
---
2.36%
3.70%
0.40%
0.01%
0.00%
---
50.84G
79.65G
8.669G
224.5M
56.77M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Blubster
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.09%
0.39%
0.27%
0.08%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
18.39T
6.623T
4.501T
1.350T
430.3G
95.73G
90.15G
55.94G
11.89G
7.166G
4.177G
1.185G
11.35M
---
0.83%
0.27%
0.36%
0.08%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
17.84G
5.825G
7.655G
1.691G
559.8M
225.3M
122.8M
77.10M
27.38M
43.97M
8.181M
3.019M
108.5k
Misc
Mail
Port 0
DNS
Squid
X11
NTP
MS Windows
AFS
RTIP
IRC
NFS
Telnet
SOCKS
SNMP
AOL AIM
IDENT
RPC Portmapper
---
0.90%
0.33%
0.16%
0.12%
0.07%
0.03%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
15.19T
5.512T
2.659T
2.067T
1.110T
497.8G
377.9G
272.6G
89.20G
68.79G
55.22G
52.42G
42.45G
23.83G
17.85G
8.899G
1.267G
---
1.43%
0.24%
0.82%
0.14%
0.07%
0.30%
0.31%
0.07%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.03%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
30.76G
5.180G
17.70G
3.073G
1.518G
6.531G
6.694G
1.501G
877.7M
464.6M
125.8M
554.2M
79.65M
186.2M
30.34M
42.61M
26.86M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
BBCP
McIDAS
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
1.37%
0.07%
0.06%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
23.08T
1.107T
1.062T
46.75G
16.91G
1.732G
---
1.21%
0.05%
0.04%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
26.10G
1.002G
838.3M
110.0M
71.66M
15.11M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.65%
0.03%
0.00%
---
11.00T
581.4G
0.000
---
0.58%
0.31%
0.00%
---
12.52G
6.657G
0.000
Audio/Video
Real Player
Any-Source Multicast
Windows Media
Backbone Radio
H.323 Signaling
Subset of VoIP
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.25%
0.23%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.176T
3.959T
403.3G
74.25G
44.23G
30.53G
22.23G
19.59G
13.20k
---
0.23%
0.18%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.990G
3.917G
355.6M
104.6M
60.31M
45.10M
33.58M
41.47M
200.0
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
Spy Arcade
---
0.13%
0.03%
0.02%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.162T
575.5G
377.9G
291.4G
80.43G
61.14G
32.54G
---
0.16%
0.07%
0.12%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.509G
1.437G
2.555G
562.1M
239.3M
97.86M
58.61M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
44.15%
---
743.9T
---
42.21%
---
908.4G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
1.685P
---
100.00%
---
2.152T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.03% 581.4G 0.31% 6.657G
IGMP[2]0.00% 59.18M 0.00% 1.591M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 185.5G 0.01% 158.5M
TCP[6]88.30% 1.487P 83.65% 1.800T
UDP[17]11.16% 188.0T 15.35% 330.4G
IPv6[41]0.07% 1.111T 0.12% 2.589G
GRE[47]0.10% 1.646T 0.14% 3.074G
ESP[50]0.32% 5.388T 0.40% 8.669G
AX.25[93]0.00% 13.20k 0.00% 200.0
PIM[103]0.00% 2.910G 0.00% 37.42M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 101.4G 0.01% 257.3M
Total100.00% 1.685P 100.00% 2.152T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)37.67% 810.7G
Medium (100-1400B)20.16% 433.8G
Large (1401-1500B)42.17% 907.5G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.00% 90.47M
Total100.00% 2.152T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.65% 1.628P 96.76% 2.082T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.18% 3.034T 0.25% 5.360G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 97.22G 0.03% 547.8M
Other3.16% 53.26T 2.97% 63.83G
Total100.00% 1.685P 100.00% 2.152T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.23% 3.797T 0.14% 2.972G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19355.00% 84.24T 4.68% 100.7G
330012.18% 36.76T 1.17% 25.16G
330020.57% 9.617T 0.31% 6.587G
200000.55% 9.330T 0.41% 8.891G
270300.50% 8.483T 0.42% 9.038G