Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20100329

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20100329 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 39.81% of octets and 21.79% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.392M 2 10.10M
5 1.479M 8 10.39M
10 1.582M 15 10.93M
50 3.141M 57 17.56M
90 15.88M 59 53.14M
95 28.49M 59 84.18M
99 77.86M 59 200.2M
99.9 175.1M 59 550.6M
99.99 675.0M 118 1.598G
99.999 1.291G 156 2.679G
100 34.35G 165 10.13G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)1.23% 5.249G
Medium (100-1400B)9.58% 40.94G
Large (1401-1500B)89.18% 381.4G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.01% 53.14M
Total100.00% 427.6G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers33.64% 204.3T 33.53% 143.3G 39.15% 8.050M
Encrypted Traffic7.02% 42.62T 7.15% 30.58G 4.27% 877.2k
File Sharing3.20% 19.46T 3.16% 13.52G 2.57% 528.9k
Advanced Apps2.91% 17.70T 2.89% 12.37G 3.12% 641.7k
Measurement1.33% 8.088T 1.86% 7.937G 0.22% 45.85k
Misc0.63% 3.800T 0.65% 2.793G 0.94% 194.2k
Games0.11% 685.1G 0.12% 508.6M 0.15% 31.21k
Audio/Video0.09% 543.1G 0.09% 380.9M 0.18% 36.84k
Unidentified51.06% 310.1T 50.55% 216.1G 49.40% 10.15M
Total100.00% 607.4T 100.00% 427.6G 100.00% 20.56M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
4.165G824412ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
3.515G824420ESnet-East [291]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.822G146412Abilene [11537]Utah Education Net [210]Iperf
1.352G146420Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]Iperf
988.6M150016Unknown [32361]Boston U [111]Iperf
983.9M146411Brookhaven National Lab [43]Abilene [11537]Iperf
979.2M150015Unknown [32361]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf
971.3M146411MIT [3]Abilene [11537]Iperf
968.4M146410INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Unknown [32361]Iperf
967.6M150020Argonne [683]U Minnesota GigaPOP [57]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.419G146420Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]BBCP
1.329G146419Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]5016 -> 5016
920.0M143514TACCNET [32093]Unknown [32361]5018 -> 5018
886.2M146415Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]Unknown [32361]5010 -> 5010
736.6M150020Unknown [32361]Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]5015 -> 5015
721.0M146410Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]U Florida [6356]5015 -> 5015
691.1M146420VANDERBILT [7212]Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]5011 -> 5011
678.6M146418U Florida [6356]Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]5019 -> 5019
656.5M146431Nat Lib Med [70]Yale [29]50101 -> 35074
650.1M146413TACCNET [32093]Unknown [32440]39786 -> 45901

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 1.633k.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers42.91% 654.7T 42.69% 837.8G
Encrypted Traffic5.57% 85.02T 6.39% 125.3G
File Sharing2.02% 30.82T 1.67% 32.67G
Advanced Apps1.59% 24.22T 1.38% 27.04G
Misc1.46% 22.32T 3.50% 68.69G
Measurement0.66% 10.03T 0.80% 15.67G
Audio/Video0.58% 8.786T 0.85% 16.74G
Games0.21% 3.249T 0.39% 7.727G
Unidentified45.00% 686.6T 42.33% 830.7G
Total100.00% 1.525P 100.00% 1.962T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
40.70%
1.08%
0.93%
0.19%
---
621.1T
16.44T
14.25T
2.963T
---
40.95%
0.83%
0.68%
0.24%
---
803.6G
16.20G
13.39G
4.670G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.68%
2.56%
0.32%
0.01%
0.00%
---
40.93T
39.08T
4.884T
107.2G
10.88G
---
2.35%
3.62%
0.40%
0.01%
0.00%
---
46.13G
71.06G
7.864G
243.5M
48.08M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
FastTrack
Gnutella
WinMX
Carracho
Blubster
Neo-Modus
Freenet
Direct Connect++
---
1.20%
0.41%
0.27%
0.10%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
18.29T
6.259T
4.108T
1.451T
501.2G
78.46G
74.98G
39.27G
6.365G
5.288G
2.740G
2.142G
24.34M
---
0.91%
0.28%
0.34%
0.09%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
17.81G
5.520G
6.623G
1.717G
601.2M
109.2M
179.6M
59.71M
11.52M
36.82M
3.724M
3.092M
71.10k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
1.42%
0.09%
0.07%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
21.60T
1.422T
1.129T
45.24G
17.24G
1.433G
---
1.25%
0.06%
0.06%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
24.61G
1.124G
1.124G
110.9M
68.65M
3.866M
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
X11
Port 0
MS Windows
NTP
AFS
RTIP
IRC
NFS
SOCKS
Telnet
SNMP
AOL AIM
IDENT
RPC Portmapper
---
0.98%
0.16%
0.13%
0.08%
0.04%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
15.00T
2.465T
1.958T
1.154T
597.3G
343.1G
290.8G
212.9G
79.81G
56.45G
46.40G
37.96G
35.85G
21.04G
18.34G
4.770G
309.5M
---
1.56%
0.97%
0.15%
0.08%
0.07%
0.32%
0.19%
0.07%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
30.55G
18.98G
2.936G
1.664G
1.347G
6.184G
3.804G
1.301G
811.5M
332.9M
102.7M
77.64M
349.9M
164.3M
28.49M
39.24M
2.726M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.62%
0.03%
0.00%
---
9.497T
533.0G
0.000
---
0.56%
0.24%
0.00%
---
10.99G
4.677G
0.000
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
Subset of VoIP
Backbone Radio
H.323 Signaling
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.32%
0.22%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.835T
3.426T
305.3G
91.10G
49.17G
43.94G
18.85G
15.48G
0.000
---
0.62%
0.21%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
12.15G
4.029G
275.1M
106.3M
69.41M
59.78M
26.37M
30.05M
0.000
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Asheron
Spy Arcade
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.12%
0.04%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.894T
554.4G
386.7G
254.0G
76.54G
43.46G
39.02G
---
0.15%
0.07%
0.13%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.990G
1.384G
2.497G
475.0M
233.7M
73.25M
72.97M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
45.00%
---
686.6T
---
42.33%
---
830.7G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
1.525P
---
100.00%
---
1.962T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.03% 533.0G 0.24% 4.677G
IGMP[2]0.00% 47.03M 0.00% 1.327M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 151.6G 0.01% 137.4M
TCP[6]89.03% 1.358P 84.30% 1.654T
UDP[17]10.43% 159.0T 14.77% 289.8G
IPv6[41]0.08% 1.174T 0.13% 2.535G
GRE[47]0.09% 1.425T 0.14% 2.751G
ESP[50]0.32% 4.884T 0.40% 7.864G
AX.25[93]0.00% 13.20k 0.00% 200.0
PIM[103]0.00% 3.092G 0.00% 40.96M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 167.2G 0.02% 313.0M
Total100.00% 1.525P 100.00% 1.962T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)38.19% 749.3G
Medium (100-1400B)19.86% 389.7G
Large (1401-1500B)41.95% 823.3G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.00% 72.21M
Total100.00% 1.962T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.21% 1.468P 96.27% 1.889T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.20% 3.004T 0.27% 5.365G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 87.28G 0.02% 465.1M
Other3.59% 54.80T 3.43% 67.28G
Total100.00% 1.525P 100.00% 1.962T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.23% 3.505T 0.13% 2.625G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19354.48% 68.37T 4.29% 84.27G
330012.00% 30.58T 1.07% 20.97G
330021.04% 15.89T 0.56% 10.90G
200000.70% 10.69T 0.51% 10.06G
80220.49% 7.486T 0.30% 5.938G