Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20100322

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20100322 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 38.18% of octets and 20.51% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.392M 2 10.10M
5 1.479M 8 10.39M
10 1.582M 15 10.92M
50 3.186M 57 17.56M
90 15.49M 59 50.65M
95 27.03M 59 77.55M
99 73.40M 59 190.9M
99.9 170.7M 59 555.8M
99.99 666.8M 113 1.626G
99.999 1.145G 137 2.919G
100 27.27G 143 11.09G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)1.36% 5.730G
Medium (100-1400B)10.54% 44.33G
Large (1401-1500B)88.08% 370.5G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.02% 101.9M
Total100.00% 420.6G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers37.05% 220.9T 36.79% 154.7G 41.99% 8.712M
Encrypted Traffic8.02% 47.83T 8.18% 34.39G 4.78% 992.5k
File Sharing3.04% 18.13T 3.00% 12.60G 2.38% 493.1k
Advanced Apps2.79% 16.65T 2.78% 11.69G 3.11% 644.5k
Measurement1.46% 8.691T 1.98% 8.319G 0.22% 46.55k
Misc0.77% 4.565T 0.79% 3.343G 1.11% 229.6k
Games0.13% 785.9G 0.13% 559.1M 0.16% 33.35k
Audio/Video0.10% 609.5G 0.10% 437.4M 0.21% 43.47k
Unidentified46.64% 278.1T 46.24% 194.5G 46.05% 9.554M
Total100.00% 596.3T 100.00% 420.6G 100.00% 20.74M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
4.585G824419ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
3.489G824420ESnet-East [291]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.924G146415Abilene [11537]Utah Education Net [210]Iperf
1.208G146419Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]Iperf
990.9M150018Unknown [32361]U Chicago [160]Iperf
982.4M150019Unknown [32361]Boston U [111]Iperf
975.4M146418Brookhaven National Lab [43]Abilene [11537]Iperf
972.0M150020Argonne [683]U Minnesota GigaPOP [57]Iperf
969.2M146418INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Boston U [111]Iperf
968.7M146419Unknown [17934]Science, Technology, and Research Transit Access Point [10764]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.433G146419Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]BBFTP
1.317G146413Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]5015 -> 5015
883.3M146417Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]U Florida [6356]5019 -> 5019
857.3M146415Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]VANDERBILT [7212]5018 -> 5018
844.9M150045Argonne [683]Unknown [36375]Shoutcast
769.2M146420Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]Unknown [32361]5016 -> 5016
749.2M146417TACCNET [32093]Unknown [32361]5013 -> 5013
735.2M150020Unknown [32361]Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]5017 -> 5017
679.3M146417U Florida [6356]Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]45090 -> 5012
625.9M146413Unknown [32440]TACCNET [32093]55507 -> 50395

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 1.640k.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers46.76% 730.5T 45.44% 931.9G
Encrypted Traffic6.15% 96.02T 6.82% 139.9G
File Sharing1.83% 28.56T 1.49% 30.55G
Advanced Apps1.56% 24.40T 1.33% 27.29G
Misc1.55% 24.25T 3.39% 69.55G
Audio/Video1.02% 15.90T 2.35% 48.26G
Measurement0.73% 11.40T 0.80% 16.49G
Games0.22% 3.507T 0.40% 8.102G
Unidentified40.17% 627.5T 37.98% 778.8G
Total100.00% 1.562P 100.00% 2.051T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
44.27%
1.14%
0.89%
0.46%
---
691.6T
17.77T
13.92T
7.199T
---
43.59%
0.84%
0.62%
0.39%
---
893.9G
17.32G
12.70G
7.915G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.93%
2.78%
0.43%
0.01%
0.00%
---
45.80T
43.41T
6.675T
110.3G
11.22G
---
2.48%
3.87%
0.46%
0.01%
0.00%
---
50.85G
79.35G
9.444G
250.3M
51.49M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
FastTrack
Gnutella
WinMX
Carracho
Neo-Modus
Blubster
Freenet
Direct Connect++
---
0.95%
0.42%
0.30%
0.12%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
14.87T
6.497T
4.616T
1.812T
527.1G
94.96G
87.15G
43.52G
6.506G
3.319G
2.725G
2.115G
143.1M
---
0.71%
0.28%
0.34%
0.11%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
14.63G
5.799G
6.880G
2.177G
621.4M
125.0M
212.6M
60.82M
13.18M
3.970M
23.77M
3.386M
221.0k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
1.40%
0.11%
0.05%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
21.79T
1.697T
853.3G
39.69G
17.65G
1.213G
---
1.20%
0.06%
0.06%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
24.67G
1.283G
1.173G
94.24M
69.23M
3.067M
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
X11
Port 0
MS Windows
NTP
AFS
RTIP
IRC
Telnet
NFS
SOCKS
SNMP
AOL AIM
IDENT
RPC Portmapper
---
1.06%
0.15%
0.12%
0.09%
0.04%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
16.60T
2.416T
1.949T
1.470T
672.1G
345.0G
285.1G
188.4G
80.25G
67.87G
47.77G
43.07G
30.90G
22.21G
16.59G
6.465G
362.6M
---
1.64%
0.83%
0.14%
0.09%
0.07%
0.29%
0.18%
0.02%
0.04%
0.03%
0.03%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
33.58G
17.04G
2.945G
1.935G
1.475G
6.014G
3.750G
511.9M
818.9M
534.8M
513.9M
83.06M
80.05M
172.0M
23.97M
56.89M
1.801M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
Backbone Radio
Subset of VoIP
H.323 Signaling
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.73%
0.25%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
11.40T
3.972T
332.3G
69.48G
47.99G
39.19G
20.98G
16.85G
0.000
---
2.10%
0.22%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
43.13G
4.566G
294.8M
87.39M
63.61M
56.92M
30.87M
32.34M
0.000
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.69%
0.04%
0.00%
---
10.81T
593.7G
0.000
---
0.58%
0.22%
0.00%
---
11.99G
4.497G
0.000
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
Spy Arcade
---
0.13%
0.04%
0.02%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.101T
622.5G
364.0G
252.0G
77.34G
59.43G
30.33G
---
0.18%
0.06%
0.11%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.649G
1.329G
2.263G
449.5M
253.1M
98.29M
59.01M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
40.17%
---
627.5T
---
37.98%
---
778.8G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
1.562P
---
100.00%
---
2.051T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.04% 593.7G 0.22% 4.497G
IGMP[2]0.00% 55.35M 0.00% 1.519M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 175.1G 0.01% 151.0M
TCP[6]88.98% 1.390P 83.72% 1.717T
UDP[17]10.36% 161.8T 15.31% 313.9G
IPv6[41]0.07% 1.154T 0.12% 2.433G
GRE[47]0.10% 1.618T 0.15% 3.063G
ESP[50]0.43% 6.675T 0.46% 9.444G
AX.25[93]0.00% 6.600k 0.00% 100.0
PIM[103]0.00% 3.428G 0.00% 46.08M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 117.0G 0.01% 279.0M
Total100.00% 1.562P 100.00% 2.051T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)38.73% 794.3G
Medium (100-1400B)20.71% 424.7G
Large (1401-1500B)40.55% 831.7G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.01% 106.0M
Total100.00% 2.051T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.71% 1.510P 96.31% 1.975T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.21% 3.277T 0.27% 5.465G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 86.13G 0.02% 432.2M
Other3.08% 48.09T 3.40% 69.73G
Total100.00% 1.562P 100.00% 2.051T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.24% 3.782T 0.16% 3.289G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19354.91% 76.73T 4.69% 96.11G
330011.73% 26.95T 0.90% 18.49G
200000.57% 8.915T 0.41% 8.327G
270300.45% 7.106T 0.35% 7.246G
164020.45% 7.035T 0.42% 8.693G