Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20100315

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20100315 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 39.11% of octets and 20.96% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.393M 2 10.10M
5 1.482M 7 10.40M
10 1.588M 15 10.93M
50 3.202M 57 17.46M
90 15.63M 59 50.95M
95 26.78M 59 79.64M
99 71.21M 59 185.9M
99.9 189.0M 59 569.0M
99.99 701.6M 119 1.752G
99.999 1.056G 155 3.097G
100 30.50G 156 10.41G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)2.73% 11.41G
Medium (100-1400B)9.73% 40.61G
Large (1401-1500B)87.52% 365.3G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.02% 70.20M
Total100.00% 417.4G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers34.56% 201.8T 33.84% 141.2G 41.01% 8.316M
Encrypted Traffic8.03% 46.92T 8.28% 34.56G 5.10% 1.033M
File Sharing2.93% 17.13T 2.86% 11.92G 2.22% 449.3k
Advanced Apps2.79% 16.26T 2.73% 11.40G 3.16% 641.4k
Measurement1.84% 10.71T 2.38% 9.942G 0.25% 49.82k
Misc0.90% 5.232T 0.94% 3.909G 1.25% 252.7k
Games0.17% 1.002T 0.17% 716.2M 0.21% 42.91k
Audio/Video0.11% 643.2G 0.11% 456.2M 0.22% 44.56k
Unidentified48.67% 284.2T 48.69% 203.2G 46.60% 9.450M
Total100.00% 583.9T 100.00% 417.4G 100.00% 20.28M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
4.378G824412ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
3.542G824418ESnet-East [291]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.543G146429Abilene [11537]Utah Education Net [210]Iperf
1.370G146412Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]Iperf
1.335G146419Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]Iperf
1.137G146460Unknown [17934]Science, Technology, and Research Transit Access Point [10764]Iperf
1.007G150011Unknown [32361]U Chicago [160]Iperf
982.8M146412Abilene [11537]U Minnesota GigaPOP [57]Iperf
982.7M150020Argonne [683]U Minnesota GigaPOP [57]Iperf
980.8M146412INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Unknown [32361]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.405G146412Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]5067 -> 5067
1.363G146415Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]5079 -> 5079
870.3M146417Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]U Florida [6356]5010 -> 5010
865.8M150020Unknown [32361]VANDERBILT [7212]5015 -> 5015
857.5M146418Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]Unknown [32361]5013 -> 5013
833.5M146420Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]VANDERBILT [7212]5011 -> 5011
778.6M150014Unknown [32361]Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]5016 -> 5016
768.5M146417VANDERBILT [7212]Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]5012 -> 5012
743.6M146411TACCNET [32093]Unknown [32361]5015 -> 5015
707.0M146410U Florida [6356]Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]5010 -> 5010

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 1.593k.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers43.87% 655.0T 42.26% 841.5G
Encrypted Traffic6.28% 93.73T 6.89% 137.2G
File Sharing1.82% 27.24T 1.48% 29.55G
Misc1.69% 25.28T 3.56% 70.94G
Advanced Apps1.66% 24.83T 1.46% 29.07G
Audio/Video1.19% 17.80T 3.40% 67.63G
Measurement0.90% 13.37T 0.94% 18.69G
Games0.26% 3.853T 0.38% 7.604G
Unidentified42.33% 632.0T 39.63% 789.1G
Total100.00% 1.493P 100.00% 1.991T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
41.34%
1.18%
1.12%
0.23%
---
617.3T
17.61T
16.70T
3.465T
---
40.40%
0.88%
0.71%
0.26%
---
804.6G
17.58G
14.14G
5.168G
Encrypted Traffic
HTTPS
SSH
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.96%
2.94%
0.36%
0.01%
0.00%
---
44.26T
43.90T
5.446T
117.4G
11.14G
---
4.00%
2.47%
0.40%
0.01%
0.00%
---
79.65G
49.25G
8.025G
259.5M
51.01M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
FastTrack
Gnutella
WinMX
Carracho
Blubster
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
0.93%
0.41%
0.32%
0.12%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
13.87T
6.176T
4.708T
1.738T
518.5G
105.6G
67.41G
44.28G
8.722G
5.126G
3.538G
1.556G
125.2M
---
0.70%
0.28%
0.34%
0.11%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
13.95G
5.586G
6.838G
2.136G
638.6M
136.9M
150.2M
62.92M
15.53M
32.68M
4.016M
2.634M
169.0k
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
X11
Port 0
AFS
NTP
MS Windows
RTIP
NFS
IRC
Telnet
SOCKS
AOL AIM
SNMP
IDENT
RPC Portmapper
---
1.13%
0.16%
0.14%
0.12%
0.04%
0.04%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
16.83T
2.367T
2.098T
1.749T
594.4G
554.5G
357.4G
337.2G
89.28G
76.02G
73.93G
52.08G
43.05G
25.92G
23.11G
8.019G
1.574G
---
1.68%
0.86%
0.16%
0.11%
0.07%
0.04%
0.24%
0.29%
0.04%
0.01%
0.02%
0.03%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
33.45G
17.03G
3.268G
2.249G
1.346G
780.6M
4.698G
5.850G
867.8M
116.9M
402.8M
526.8M
81.81M
31.08M
177.1M
45.88M
2.739M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
BBFTP
GsiFTP
IBP
---
1.48%
0.11%
0.06%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
22.12T
1.574T
967.8G
118.8G
48.24G
2.801G
---
1.25%
0.06%
0.13%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
24.97G
1.199G
2.577G
171.0M
114.1M
34.55M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
Subset of VoIP
Backbone Radio
H.323 Signaling
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.88%
0.27%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
13.13T
4.084T
337.4G
85.80G
63.84G
53.44G
21.81G
17.66G
3.649M
---
3.13%
0.23%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
62.35G
4.630G
312.9M
111.5M
83.81M
66.13M
35.38M
32.99M
55.30k
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.85%
0.05%
0.00%
---
12.62T
748.1G
146.4k
---
0.67%
0.26%
0.00%
---
13.43G
5.263G
100.0
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
Spy Arcade
---
0.16%
0.05%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.438T
686.2G
297.2G
267.5G
83.03G
50.71G
30.28G
---
0.18%
0.07%
0.09%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.648G
1.308G
1.833G
444.5M
232.6M
84.07M
52.94M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
42.33%
---
632.0T
---
39.63%
---
789.1G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
1.493P
---
100.00%
---
1.991T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.05% 748.1G 0.26% 5.263G
IGMP[2]0.00% 64.71M 0.00% 1.743M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 202.3G 0.01% 173.1M
TCP[6]88.54% 1.322P 82.57% 1.644T
UDP[17]10.84% 161.8T 16.50% 328.5G
IPv6[41]0.08% 1.198T 0.12% 2.482G
GRE[47]0.10% 1.470T 0.11% 2.251G
ESP[50]0.36% 5.446T 0.40% 8.025G
AX.25[93]0.00% 33.00k 0.00% 500.0
PIM[103]0.00% 3.690G 0.00% 48.80M
IPMP[169]0.00% 146.4k 0.00% 100.0
Other0.01% 125.9G 0.01% 297.0M
Total100.00% 1.493P 100.00% 1.991T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)39.82% 792.9G
Medium (100-1400B)20.42% 406.6G
Large (1401-1500B)39.76% 791.7G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.00% 70.69M
Total100.00% 1.991T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.39% 1.439P 96.84% 1.928T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.16% 2.349T 0.16% 3.239G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 103.9G 0.03% 519.1M
Other3.45% 51.45T 2.97% 59.07G
Total100.00% 1.493P 100.00% 1.991T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.22% 3.340T 0.14% 2.874G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19355.17% 77.15T 5.16% 102.6G
330012.10% 31.39T 1.08% 21.52G
600110.86% 12.84T 0.58% 11.49G
330020.81% 12.02T 0.41% 8.243G
80220.65% 9.664T 0.39% 7.757G