Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20100308

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20100308 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 38.13% of octets and 20.26% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.394M 2 10.10M
5 1.487M 6 10.42M
10 1.599M 13 10.93M
50 3.447M 57 17.60M
90 16.83M 59 53.28M
95 30.48M 59 81.90M
99 78.97M 59 182.4M
99.9 232.5M 59 597.2M
99.99 656.2M 111 1.549G
99.999 1.018G 123 2.580G
100 38.35G 195 10.90G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)1.22% 5.285G
Medium (100-1400B)8.93% 38.72G
Large (1401-1500B)89.83% 389.4G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.02% 102.4M
Total100.00% 433.5G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers34.02% 209.6T 33.78% 146.4G 41.49% 8.754M
Encrypted Traffic7.97% 49.09T 8.20% 35.54G 5.25% 1.108M
Advanced Apps3.39% 20.87T 3.36% 14.58G 4.08% 860.7k
File Sharing2.76% 17.00T 2.73% 11.83G 2.15% 453.0k
Measurement1.39% 8.575T 1.84% 7.974G 0.21% 43.57k
Misc0.86% 5.313T 0.89% 3.850G 1.26% 265.9k
Games0.16% 1.008T 0.17% 719.0M 0.20% 41.29k
Audio/Video0.10% 646.2G 0.11% 456.0M 0.21% 45.16k
Unidentified49.35% 304.1T 48.93% 212.1G 45.15% 9.526M
Total100.00% 616.2T 100.00% 433.5G 100.00% 21.09M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
4.537G824419ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
4.146G824419Unknown [0]Abilene [11537]Iperf
3.656G824414ESnet-East [291]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.657G146418Abilene [11537]Utah Education Net [210]Iperf
1.273G146420Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]Iperf
1.240G146415Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]Iperf
997.5M900054Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
992.0M150010Unknown [32361]UIUC [38]Iperf
985.6M150017Argonne [683]U Minnesota GigaPOP [57]Iperf
981.5M146413Brookhaven National Lab [43]Abilene [11537]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.407G146416Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]5019 -> 5019
1.372G146415Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]5072 -> 5072
1.181G146423Unknown [32440]NCSA [1224]50099 -> 50383
857.8M146420Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]U Florida [6356]5018 -> 5018
848.6M146413Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]Unknown [32361]5017 -> 5017
799.0M150018Unknown [32361]Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]5012 -> 5012
784.2M149820Unknown [32361]VANDERBILT [7212]5012 -> 5012
774.8M146413Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]VANDERBILT [7212]5012 -> 5012
771.9M146419TACCNET [32093]Unknown [32361]5015 -> 5015
768.3M146418VANDERBILT [7212]Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]5014 -> 5014

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 1.621k.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers43.89% 709.2T 44.03% 942.3G
Encrypted Traffic7.31% 118.0T 7.74% 165.6G
Advanced Apps1.92% 30.97T 1.66% 35.47G
Misc1.77% 28.57T 3.62% 77.57G
File Sharing1.73% 27.96T 1.43% 30.53G
Audio/Video0.79% 12.76T 0.66% 14.19G
Measurement0.70% 11.24T 0.81% 17.33G
Games0.25% 4.022T 0.39% 8.406G
Unidentified41.66% 673.2T 39.66% 848.8G
Total100.00% 1.616P 100.00% 2.140T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
41.75%
1.08%
0.86%
0.19%
---
674.7T
17.51T
13.89T
3.068T
---
42.36%
0.84%
0.59%
0.24%
---
906.6G
17.96G
12.66G
5.040G
Encrypted Traffic
HTTPS
SSH
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.12%
2.81%
1.38%
0.01%
0.00%
---
50.37T
45.34T
22.25T
93.22G
13.21G
---
4.19%
2.41%
1.12%
0.01%
0.00%
---
89.77G
51.61G
23.95G
223.6M
59.24M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
IBP
BBFTP
---
1.74%
0.09%
0.09%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
28.08T
1.426T
1.377T
47.99G
26.56G
15.53G
---
1.47%
0.05%
0.13%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
31.42G
1.143G
2.702G
118.3M
24.59M
67.85M
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
Port 0
X11
MS Windows
AFS
NTP
IRC
RTIP
NFS
Telnet
AOL AIM
SNMP
SOCKS
IDENT
RPC Portmapper
---
1.19%
0.16%
0.14%
0.11%
0.09%
0.02%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
19.20T
2.608T
2.235T
1.819T
1.375T
349.4G
311.0G
276.5G
92.69G
87.03G
56.49G
49.91G
34.75G
26.72G
24.58G
20.14G
673.4M
---
1.77%
0.89%
0.16%
0.12%
0.08%
0.29%
0.03%
0.17%
0.02%
0.04%
0.00%
0.02%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
37.95G
18.96G
3.462G
2.498G
1.773G
6.161G
743.6M
3.636G
487.8M
901.5M
103.3M
519.4M
42.71M
205.3M
60.13M
58.06M
4.516M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
FastTrack
Gnutella
WinMX
Carracho
Freenet
Blubster
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
0.91%
0.36%
0.31%
0.10%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
14.66T
5.850T
4.984T
1.565T
635.3G
102.5G
87.01G
59.02G
9.258G
5.229G
3.763G
1.137G
13.08M
---
0.70%
0.24%
0.33%
0.09%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
14.94G
5.226G
7.161G
1.949G
792.6M
135.0M
191.6M
82.84M
17.21M
7.070M
28.89M
1.962M
91.70k
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Backbone Radio
Windows Media
Subset of VoIP
H.323 Signaling
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.32%
0.29%
0.15%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.168T
4.615T
2.411T
388.4G
73.91G
54.58G
26.31G
24.70G
16.71M
---
0.23%
0.27%
0.13%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.024G
5.690G
2.875G
371.6M
91.14M
69.28M
37.42M
39.90M
253.3k
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.66%
0.04%
0.00%
---
10.62T
625.0G
0.000
---
0.55%
0.26%
0.00%
---
11.73G
5.603G
0.000
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
Spy Arcade
---
0.16%
0.04%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.582T
615.4G
335.4G
288.6G
102.1G
68.07G
30.71G
---
0.18%
0.06%
0.10%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
3.929G
1.328G
2.170G
506.1M
277.5M
132.3M
62.14M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
41.66%
---
673.2T
---
39.66%
---
848.8G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
1.616P
---
100.00%
---
2.140T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.04% 625.0G 0.26% 5.603G
IGMP[2]0.00% 66.82M 0.00% 1.791M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 193.0G 0.01% 163.4M
TCP[6]87.84% 1.419P 83.80% 1.793T
UDP[17]10.45% 168.8T 14.44% 308.9G
IPv6[41]0.08% 1.241T 0.12% 2.591G
GRE[47]0.19% 3.146T 0.23% 5.012G
ESP[50]1.38% 22.25T 1.12% 23.95G
AX.25[93]0.00% 13.20k 0.00% 200.0
PIM[103]0.00% 18.65G 0.00% 76.63M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 117.5G 0.02% 324.9M
Total100.00% 1.616P 100.00% 2.140T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)39.34% 842.0G
Medium (100-1400B)20.92% 447.6G
Large (1401-1500B)39.74% 850.4G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.00% 104.8M
Total100.00% 2.140T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]95.80% 1.548P 96.22% 2.059T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.21% 3.429T 0.26% 5.478G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 134.6G 0.03% 634.5M
Other3.98% 64.29T 3.50% 74.85G
Total100.00% 1.616P 100.00% 2.140T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.19% 3.030T 0.11% 2.377G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19354.35% 70.34T 4.09% 87.46G
330011.24% 20.08T 0.64% 13.77G
330020.99% 16.01T 0.51% 11.01G
600110.89% 14.45T 0.59% 12.52G
150000.52% 8.365T 0.49% 10.55G