Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20100301

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20100301 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 37.97% of octets and 19.80% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.395M 2 10.10M
5 1.486M 7 10.44M
10 1.592M 15 10.93M
50 3.252M 57 17.32M
90 16.12M 59 53.14M
95 28.95M 59 82.27M
99 70.44M 59 181.4M
99.9 187.2M 59 579.0M
99.99 663.4M 102 1.826G
99.999 1.026G 117 4.321G
100 17.33G 119 10.71G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)1.16% 5.692G
Medium (100-1400B)8.29% 40.57G
Large (1401-1500B)90.47% 442.5G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.08% 379.1M
Total100.00% 489.2G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers31.43% 219.7T 31.38% 153.5G 37.32% 8.947M
Encrypted Traffic6.62% 46.25T 6.80% 33.28G 4.71% 1.128M
Advanced Apps3.38% 23.59T 3.35% 16.41G 3.90% 933.9k
File Sharing2.90% 20.26T 2.87% 14.06G 2.28% 547.4k
Measurement1.54% 10.74T 1.69% 8.270G 0.22% 51.89k
Misc0.97% 6.788T 0.99% 4.859G 1.47% 351.5k
Games0.15% 1.070T 0.16% 767.6M 0.20% 47.44k
Audio/Video0.11% 740.6G 0.11% 519.6M 0.22% 52.35k
Unidentified52.91% 369.8T 52.64% 257.5G 49.70% 11.91M
Total100.00% 699.0T 100.00% 489.2G 100.00% 23.97M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
4.488G824410ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
4.124G824420ESnet-East [291]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.265G146414Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]Iperf
1.228G146421Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]Iperf
1.038G900020UC Santa Cruz [5739]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.026G900014Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
994.9M150011Unknown [32361]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf
992.5M150011U Minnesota GigaPOP [57]Abilene [11537]Iperf
992.0M150014U Minnesota GigaPOP [57]Argonne [683]Iperf
985.0M150010Argonne [683]U Minnesota GigaPOP [57]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.411G146412Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]5030 -> 5030
1.403G146412Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]5099 -> 5099
879.8M150013Unknown [32361]VANDERBILT [7212]5010 -> 5010
819.0M146460Unknown [32440]NCSA [1224]60984 -> 40359
799.4M146420Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]Unknown [32361]5018 -> 5018
773.8M146416Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]VANDERBILT [7212]5018 -> 5018
760.3M146416UNL [7896]Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]Audiogalaxy
720.9M150020Unknown [32361]Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]5011 -> 5011
700.7M146410Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]U Florida [6356]5012 -> 5012
691.2M150016Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]UNL [7896]49307 -> 37837

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 1.877k.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers41.89% 771.2T 42.63% 1.053T
Encrypted Traffic6.71% 123.5T 7.25% 179.0G
Advanced Apps1.91% 35.19T 1.51% 37.28G
File Sharing1.80% 33.17T 1.45% 35.87G
Misc1.79% 33.04T 3.50% 86.58G
Measurement0.74% 13.61T 0.74% 18.38G
Audio/Video0.68% 12.57T 0.57% 14.04G
Games0.26% 4.744T 0.41% 10.16G
Unidentified44.21% 813.8T 41.94% 1.036T
Total100.00% 1.841P 100.00% 2.470T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
39.61%
1.26%
0.83%
0.19%
---
729.1T
23.27T
15.31T
3.473T
---
40.84%
0.97%
0.58%
0.24%
---
1.009T
24.06G
14.25G
5.870G
Encrypted Traffic
HTTPS
SSH
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.17%
2.30%
1.24%
0.00%
0.00%
---
58.37T
42.30T
22.79T
85.59G
16.68G
---
4.18%
2.04%
1.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
103.3G
50.39G
25.03G
212.1M
70.66M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
BBCP
McIDAS
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
1.59%
0.21%
0.11%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
29.30T
3.856T
1.935T
71.62G
17.66G
6.289G
---
1.29%
0.15%
0.06%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
31.88G
3.587G
1.567G
141.9M
74.00M
22.31M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Blubster
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
0.97%
0.36%
0.31%
0.11%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
17.83T
6.627T
5.709T
2.056T
630.6G
115.8G
115.2G
52.28G
15.53G
8.222G
3.718G
861.8M
12.31M
---
0.73%
0.24%
0.32%
0.10%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
18.10G
5.929G
8.008G
2.428G
795.2M
292.7M
155.5M
87.59M
22.98M
45.80M
5.379M
2.602M
103.4k
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
X11
Port 0
AFS
MS Windows
NTP
RTIP
IRC
NFS
Telnet
SOCKS
SNMP
AOL AIM
IDENT
RPC Portmapper
---
1.23%
0.15%
0.14%
0.10%
0.08%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
22.66T
2.718T
2.584T
1.902T
1.547T
545.1G
406.6G
267.3G
98.53G
74.39G
70.88G
44.84G
34.97G
30.06G
27.64G
25.29G
523.0M
---
1.76%
0.84%
0.17%
0.09%
0.10%
0.04%
0.27%
0.14%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
---
43.37G
20.67G
4.179G
2.299G
2.367G
1.046G
6.637G
3.507G
1.026G
443.6M
146.1M
350.3M
75.55M
219.9M
38.37M
188.1M
4.016M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.70%
0.04%
0.00%
---
12.94T
674.4G
0.000
---
0.50%
0.24%
0.00%
---
12.38G
5.998G
0.000
Audio/Video
Real Player
Any-Source Multicast
Backbone Radio
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Subset of VoIP
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.27%
0.21%
0.18%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.946T
3.775T
3.257T
440.1G
62.26G
44.29G
32.26G
20.48G
0.000
---
0.24%
0.15%
0.15%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.990G
3.585G
3.817G
427.7M
81.42M
60.63M
44.83M
38.23M
0.000
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
Spy Arcade
---
0.15%
0.05%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.842T
883.1G
433.4G
370.0G
112.9G
68.80G
33.81G
---
0.18%
0.07%
0.12%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
4.396G
1.756G
2.884G
643.3M
276.7M
130.8M
72.97M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
44.21%
---
813.8T
---
41.94%
---
1.036T
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
1.841P
---
100.00%
---
2.470T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.04% 674.4G 0.24% 5.998G
IGMP[2]0.00% 70.16M 0.00% 1.890M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 188.0G 0.01% 163.3M
TCP[6]88.26% 1.624P 83.51% 2.063T
UDP[17]10.16% 186.9T 14.85% 366.8G
IPv6[41]0.06% 1.117T 0.10% 2.537G
GRE[47]0.22% 4.012T 0.24% 5.993G
ESP[50]1.24% 22.79T 1.01% 25.03G
AX.25[93]0.00% 6.600k 0.00% 100.0
PIM[103]0.01% 169.2G 0.01% 339.2M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 205.7G 0.02% 410.0M
Total100.00% 1.841P 100.00% 2.470T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)39.77% 982.5G
Medium (100-1400B)20.96% 517.7G
Large (1401-1500B)39.26% 970.0G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.02% 394.2M
Total100.00% 2.470T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]95.99% 1.767P 96.55% 2.385T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.19% 3.441T 0.24% 5.932G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 159.3G 0.03% 730.7M
Other3.81% 70.15T 3.18% 78.48G
Total100.00% 1.841P 100.00% 2.470T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.18% 3.286T 0.10% 2.492G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19355.21% 96.00T 4.64% 114.6G
330010.99% 18.17T 0.50% 12.45G
600110.83% 15.36T 0.64% 15.82G
330020.63% 11.52T 0.32% 7.893G
164020.40% 7.326T 0.37% 9.239G