Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20100222

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20100222 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, data for the following day(s) were missing: Friday, Saturday. We multiplied all nominal quantities by 7/5 to estimate the amounts of various types of traffic. Percentages and distributions were not modified.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 37.69% of octets and 19.30% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.396M 2 10.09M
5 1.489M 8 10.45M
10 1.596M 15 10.93M
50 3.208M 57 17.56M
90 15.87M 59 54.61M
95 28.02M 59 83.55M
99 86.06M 59 191.4M
99.9 243.2M 59 581.0M
99.99 651.0M 92 1.810G
99.999 1.040G 108 4.384G
100 26.89G 109 20.03G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.98% 5.072G
Medium (100-1400B)8.65% 44.54G
Large (1401-1500B)90.27% 464.9G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.10% 504.4M
Total100.00% 515.0G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers30.91% 228.1T 30.91% 159.1G 38.81% 9.656M
Encrypted Traffic6.79% 50.10T 6.98% 35.97G 5.01% 1.247M
Advanced Apps3.31% 24.43T 3.31% 17.02G 3.95% 981.7k
File Sharing3.18% 23.48T 3.15% 16.24G 2.33% 580.3k
Measurement1.74% 12.82T 1.72% 8.850G 0.22% 54.27k
Misc0.77% 5.657T 0.79% 4.074G 1.17% 291.0k
Games0.15% 1.121T 0.16% 809.5M 0.24% 58.87k
Audio/Video0.12% 861.8G 0.12% 608.3M 0.25% 62.70k
Unidentified53.04% 391.4T 52.86% 272.2G 48.03% 11.95M
Total100.00% 738.0T 100.00% 515.0G 100.00% 24.88M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
5.342G900030Argonne [683]Abilene [11537]Iperf
4.234G824418ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
4.179G824420ESnet-East [291]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.020G900010Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.005G150012Unknown [32361]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf
990.2M150016Argonne [683]U Minnesota GigaPOP [57]Iperf
976.2M150015Unknown [32361]U Chicago [160]Iperf
968.9M150020Abilene [11537]U Minnesota GigaPOP [57]Iperf
966.6M150020Unknown [32361]UIUC [38]Iperf
964.9M146416Brookhaven National Lab [43]Abilene [11537]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.417G146417Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]5088 -> 5088
1.314G146419Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]5080 -> 5080
823.4M150020Unknown [32361]VANDERBILT [7212]5013 -> 5013
790.7M146411Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]Unknown [32361]5012 -> 5012
783.4M146310UNL [7896]Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]60523 -> 20022
748.4M146415Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]VANDERBILT [7212]5011 -> 5011
714.7M150012Unknown [32361]Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]5014 -> 5014
694.1M146412Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]U Florida [6356]5016 -> 5016
689.1M150013Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]UNL [7896]36883 -> 58825
682.3M146420VANDERBILT [7212]Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]5014 -> 5014

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 1.959k.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers42.37% 829.6T 43.48% 1.160T
Encrypted Traffic6.21% 121.6T 6.92% 184.7G
Misc2.02% 39.64T 3.60% 96.13G
Advanced Apps1.92% 37.55T 1.50% 39.98G
File Sharing1.88% 36.82T 1.48% 39.55G
Measurement0.83% 16.16T 0.77% 20.48G
Audio/Video0.49% 9.641T 0.58% 15.58G
Games0.28% 5.423T 0.43% 11.52G
Unidentified44.00% 861.7T 41.23% 1.100T
Total100.00% 1.958P 100.00% 2.668T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
FTP
Rsync
NNTP
---
40.32%
1.04%
0.85%
0.16%
---
789.5T
20.31T
16.67T
3.107T
---
41.89%
0.70%
0.65%
0.24%
---
1.117T
18.58G
17.24G
6.427G
Encrypted Traffic
HTTPS
SSH
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.17%
2.46%
0.57%
0.01%
0.00%
---
62.08T
48.21T
11.25T
121.1G
15.54G
---
4.23%
2.11%
0.57%
0.01%
0.00%
---
112.9G
56.27G
15.18G
272.8M
71.14M
Misc
Mail
Port 0
DNS
Squid
X11
AFS
MS Windows
NTP
RTIP
IRC
NFS
Telnet
SOCKS
SNMP
AOL AIM
IDENT
RPC Portmapper
---
1.14%
0.43%
0.15%
0.14%
0.07%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
22.33T
8.370T
2.878T
2.757T
1.446T
709.9G
417.7G
262.0G
102.2G
84.72G
83.00G
70.49G
33.70G
32.99G
30.96G
26.94G
1.036G
---
1.67%
0.28%
0.89%
0.14%
0.08%
0.04%
0.27%
0.13%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.02%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
---
44.52G
7.519G
23.81G
3.826G
2.037G
1.096G
7.122G
3.435G
1.036G
441.0M
136.3M
552.8M
66.68M
234.8M
43.46M
237.4M
4.084M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
BBCP
McIDAS
GsiFTP
IBP
BBFTP
---
1.62%
0.17%
0.12%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
31.79T
3.345T
2.303T
60.31G
30.71G
25.89G
---
1.29%
0.12%
0.07%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
34.51G
3.325G
1.843G
152.9M
57.97M
95.78M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Blubster
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.00%
0.45%
0.29%
0.09%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
19.61T
8.727T
5.661T
1.840T
628.9G
149.7G
117.9G
58.71G
12.99G
5.138G
2.712G
677.7M
209.7M
---
0.74%
0.29%
0.31%
0.08%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
19.71G
7.806G
8.321G
2.234G
805.3M
321.6M
168.1M
108.9M
23.23M
49.74M
5.626M
2.469M
277.6k
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.79%
0.05%
0.00%
---
15.44T
1.007T
0.000
---
0.51%
0.36%
0.00%
---
13.66G
9.535G
0.000
Audio/Video
Real Player
Any-Source Multicast
Windows Media
Backbone Radio
H.323 Signaling
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.28%
0.17%
0.03%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.541T
3.379T
500.4G
90.94G
57.73G
31.59G
21.83G
17.97G
0.000
---
0.25%
0.30%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.772G
7.996G
479.3M
128.2M
83.23M
47.48M
40.46M
35.62M
0.000
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Asheron
Spy Arcade
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.16%
0.06%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.230T
1.093T
496.3G
367.0G
116.9G
62.79G
56.25G
---
0.19%
0.08%
0.12%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.989G
2.034G
3.325G
689.6M
275.2M
100.7M
112.8M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
44.00%
---
861.7T
---
41.23%
---
1.100T
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
1.958P
---
100.00%
---
2.668T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.05% 1.007T 0.36% 9.535G
IGMP[2]0.00% 69.85M 0.00% 1.884M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 225.2G 0.01% 190.2M
TCP[6]89.05% 1.743P 84.14% 2.244T
UDP[17]10.10% 197.7T 14.73% 392.9G
IPv6[41]0.07% 1.310T 0.11% 2.859G
GRE[47]0.14% 2.775T 0.16% 4.269G
ESP[50]0.57% 11.25T 0.57% 15.18G
AX.25[93]0.00% 9.240k 0.00% 140.0
PIM[103]0.01% 176.6G 0.01% 380.0M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.02% 313.5G 0.02% 581.7M
Total100.00% 1.958P 100.00% 2.668T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)40.33% 1.076T
Medium (100-1400B)21.13% 563.7G
Large (1401-1500B)38.52% 1.027T
Jumbo (>1500B)0.02% 528.5M
Total100.00% 2.668T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]97.07% 1.900P 97.28% 2.595T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.14% 2.684T 0.15% 4.025G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 156.7G 0.03% 728.7M
Other2.79% 54.57T 2.55% 67.90G
Total100.00% 1.958P 100.00% 2.668T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.15% 2.929T 0.08% 2.204G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19354.02% 78.77T 3.52% 93.84G
330010.54% 10.65T 0.27% 7.323G
164020.44% 8.708T 0.41% 10.88G
200000.30% 5.928T 0.22% 5.773G
150000.30% 5.864T 0.27% 7.191G