Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20100215

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20100215 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 40.37% of octets and 20.83% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.397M 2 10.10M
5 1.492M 8 10.50M
10 1.604M 15 10.95M
50 3.280M 57 17.85M
90 16.30M 59 55.95M
95 27.51M 59 89.74M
99 82.30M 59 201.5M
99.9 213.7M 59 529.2M
99.99 719.6M 61 1.947G
99.999 1.140G 117 5.210G
100 24.30G 118 10.16G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)1.00% 5.338G
Medium (100-1400B)8.16% 43.39G
Large (1401-1500B)90.67% 482.1G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.16% 874.6M
Total100.00% 531.7G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers28.94% 221.6T 29.11% 154.8G 36.62% 9.231M
Encrypted Traffic5.78% 44.27T 5.85% 31.10G 4.56% 1.150M
File Sharing3.10% 23.76T 3.09% 16.43G 2.30% 579.0k
Advanced Apps2.57% 19.68T 2.57% 13.68G 3.37% 850.0k
Measurement1.99% 15.26T 1.79% 9.508G 0.21% 54.01k
Misc0.74% 5.654T 0.77% 4.076G 1.16% 293.5k
Games0.16% 1.253T 0.17% 892.2M 0.26% 64.32k
Audio/Video0.09% 723.6G 0.10% 510.2M 0.20% 51.58k
Unidentified56.61% 433.4T 56.56% 300.7G 51.31% 12.93M
Total100.00% 765.7T 100.00% 531.7G 100.00% 25.20M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
4.353G824417ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
4.165G824420ESnet-East [291]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.129G146420Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]Iperf
1.079G900013Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
998.7M150013Unknown [32361]UIUC [38]Iperf
989.8M146420Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]Iperf
982.4M146414Brookhaven National Lab [43]Abilene [11537]Iperf
978.5M146422UNL [7896]Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]Iperf
972.5M146414MIT [3]Abilene [11537]Iperf
970.8M150019UIUC [38]Boston U [111]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.415G146414Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]5041 -> 5041
1.410G146414Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]5018 -> 5018
963.5M146419Brookhaven National Lab [43]Abilene [11537]5011 -> 5011
950.7M150010Abilene [11537]Utah Education Net [210]3003 -> 58766
925.3M146420MIT [3]Abilene [11537]5019 -> 5019
852.9M146420Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]Unknown [32361]5016 -> 5016
809.5M146424Pennsylvania State U [3999]Abilene [11537]5017 -> 5017
806.9M146414UNL [7896]Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]55364 -> 20416
791.0M146420Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]SDSC [195]5011 -> 5011
767.0M146420Unknown [32361]VANDERBILT [7212]5019 -> 5019

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 1.976k.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers40.11% 760.7T 41.87% 1.068T
Encrypted Traffic6.22% 117.9T 6.84% 174.5G
File Sharing1.91% 36.13T 1.50% 38.35G
Advanced Apps1.67% 31.61T 1.37% 34.98G
Misc1.67% 31.60T 3.37% 86.11G
Measurement0.96% 18.28T 0.80% 20.44G
Audio/Video0.57% 10.90T 0.64% 16.43G
Games0.28% 5.240T 0.44% 11.20G
Unidentified46.62% 884.3T 43.16% 1.101T
Total100.00% 1.896P 100.00% 2.552T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
38.16%
0.99%
0.80%
0.17%
---
723.7T
18.70T
15.17T
3.167T
---
40.27%
0.78%
0.57%
0.25%
---
1.028T
19.84G
14.60G
6.318G
Encrypted Traffic
HTTPS
SSH
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.05%
2.21%
0.95%
0.01%
0.00%
---
57.83T
41.97T
18.00T
134.0G
16.47G
---
4.06%
1.92%
0.84%
0.01%
0.00%
---
103.7G
48.97G
21.49G
284.2M
70.87M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Blubster
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.05%
0.43%
0.27%
0.11%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
19.94T
8.165T
5.074T
2.001T
605.5G
136.7G
115.2G
67.72G
12.89G
5.247G
3.815G
1.332G
155.1M
---
0.77%
0.29%
0.29%
0.09%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
19.72G
7.430G
7.468G
2.355G
741.1M
298.7M
160.6M
98.93M
23.48M
45.59M
5.416M
2.260M
187.6k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
1.51%
0.12%
0.03%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
28.55T
2.344T
612.9G
72.52G
25.66G
2.255G
---
1.24%
0.07%
0.04%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
31.70G
1.891G
1.117G
165.5M
96.40M
8.953M
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
X11
Port 0
AFS
MS Windows
NTP
RTIP
IRC
NFS
Telnet
IDENT
SNMP
SOCKS
AOL AIM
RPC Portmapper
---
1.16%
0.15%
0.13%
0.08%
0.05%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
21.99T
2.819T
2.494T
1.565T
999.1G
574.1G
446.0G
272.3G
97.66G
88.82G
82.30G
49.38G
40.15G
31.63G
30.89G
18.69G
797.0M
---
1.71%
0.81%
0.14%
0.08%
0.09%
0.04%
0.28%
0.14%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.02%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
43.56G
20.62G
3.607G
2.091G
2.247G
935.7M
7.082G
3.542G
971.1M
448.3M
135.5M
438.6M
84.89M
228.6M
69.21M
29.91M
4.023M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.93%
0.04%
0.00%
---
17.61T
665.3G
0.000
---
0.56%
0.24%
0.00%
---
14.20G
6.239G
0.000
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
Backbone Radio
H.323 Signaling
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.29%
0.25%
0.03%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.427T
4.757T
501.9G
84.20G
65.29G
32.60G
24.28G
12.68G
0.000
---
0.39%
0.22%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.882G
5.731G
500.8M
105.2M
88.46M
52.84M
42.62M
28.85M
0.000
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
Spy Arcade
---
0.16%
0.06%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.122T
1.088T
486.1G
308.0G
108.0G
68.36G
58.72G
---
0.18%
0.08%
0.13%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
4.717G
2.074G
3.329G
600.9M
253.7M
130.9M
96.16M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
46.62%
---
884.3T
---
43.16%
---
1.101T
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
1.896P
---
100.00%
---
2.552T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.04% 665.3G 0.24% 6.239G
IGMP[2]0.00% 121.5M 0.00% 2.525M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 173.5G 0.01% 152.0M
TCP[6]89.26% 1.693P 84.13% 2.147T
UDP[17]9.52% 180.6T 14.48% 369.7G
IPv6[41]0.07% 1.244T 0.10% 2.620G
GRE[47]0.14% 2.625T 0.15% 3.941G
ESP[50]0.95% 18.00T 0.84% 21.49G
AX.25[93]0.00% 186.0k 0.00% 700.0
PIM[103]0.01% 191.7G 0.02% 428.5M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 200.2G 0.02% 475.2M
Total100.00% 1.896P 100.00% 2.552T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)39.98% 1.020T
Medium (100-1400B)20.84% 531.9G
Large (1401-1500B)39.15% 999.3G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.04% 906.4M
Total100.00% 2.552T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]97.20% 1.843P 97.33% 2.484T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.14% 2.747T 0.15% 3.917G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 144.3G 0.03% 669.2M
Other2.65% 50.30T 2.49% 63.46G
Total100.00% 1.896P 100.00% 2.552T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.20% 3.733T 0.11% 2.759G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19355.46% 103.5T 4.94% 126.2G
330010.80% 15.20T 0.41% 10.40G
200000.74% 14.02T 0.53% 13.54G
164020.63% 11.97T 0.58% 14.82G
600110.57% 10.80T 0.45% 11.47G