Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20100208

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20100208 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 41.18% of octets and 21.41% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.399M 2 10.10M
5 1.497M 9 10.50M
10 1.613M 16 10.98M
50 3.316M 57 17.89M
90 15.49M 59 58.20M
95 26.17M 59 91.16M
99 79.15M 59 213.9M
99.9 274.7M 59 633.0M
99.99 746.4M 101 2.105G
99.999 1.120G 118 5.083G
100 25.18G 119 10.24G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)1.11% 6.320G
Medium (100-1400B)8.25% 46.80G
Large (1401-1500B)90.49% 513.1G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.14% 775.5M
Total100.00% 567.0G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers29.61% 241.0T 29.69% 168.3G 37.32% 9.667M
Encrypted Traffic6.09% 49.57T 6.29% 35.65G 5.03% 1.303M
File Sharing2.97% 24.14T 2.95% 16.74G 2.24% 580.0k
Advanced Apps2.51% 20.42T 2.50% 14.18G 3.31% 856.6k
Measurement1.88% 15.33T 1.63% 9.224G 0.19% 49.49k
Misc0.78% 6.360T 0.80% 4.545G 1.22% 316.3k
Games0.17% 1.368T 0.17% 982.7M 0.26% 68.62k
Audio/Video0.09% 761.4G 0.10% 539.1M 0.21% 54.22k
Unidentified55.89% 455.0T 55.87% 316.7G 50.21% 13.00M
Total100.00% 814.0T 100.00% 567.0G 100.00% 25.90M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
4.429G824414ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
4.383G824414ESnet-East [291]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.336G146421Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]Iperf
1.288G146420Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]Iperf
1.038G900016Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
999.3M150014Unknown [32361]U Chicago [160]Iperf
985.3M150010NIST-BOULDER [2648]Abilene [11537]Iperf
983.0M146412UNL [7896]Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]Iperf
975.6M150016Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]UNL [7896]Iperf
975.6M146414Brookhaven National Lab [43]Abilene [11537]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.404G146416Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]5056 -> 5056
1.329G146416Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]5077 -> 5077
965.3M146411Brookhaven National Lab [43]Abilene [11537]5015 -> 5015
936.8M146420MIT [3]Abilene [11537]5011 -> 5011
859.3M146416UNL [7896]Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]44674 -> 22626
838.4M146420Unknown [32361]VANDERBILT [7212]5019 -> 5019
820.1M146427Pennsylvania State U [3999]Abilene [11537]5017 -> 5017
788.6M146418Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]Unknown [32361]5012 -> 5012
771.4M146414VANDERBILT [7212]Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]5016 -> 5016
752.3M146428U Wisconsin [59]U Florida [6356]46736 -> 38257

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 2.046k.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers40.65% 803.6T 42.35% 1.121T
Encrypted Traffic6.61% 130.7T 7.28% 192.7G
File Sharing1.86% 36.72T 1.49% 39.43G
Advanced Apps1.75% 34.52T 1.56% 41.43G
Misc1.74% 34.40T 3.44% 91.01G
Measurement0.96% 18.94T 0.79% 20.89G
Audio/Video0.57% 11.32T 0.44% 11.76G
Games0.28% 5.564T 0.45% 11.87G
Unidentified45.58% 901.0T 42.21% 1.117T
Total100.00% 1.976P 100.00% 2.648T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
FTP
Rsync
NNTP
---
38.60%
1.00%
0.87%
0.18%
---
763.0T
19.80T
17.22T
3.556T
---
40.69%
0.69%
0.72%
0.25%
---
1.077T
18.24G
19.14G
6.511G
Encrypted Traffic
HTTPS
SSH
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.03%
2.38%
1.19%
0.01%
0.00%
---
59.95T
47.09T
23.59T
100.0G
16.63G
---
4.11%
2.10%
1.06%
0.01%
0.00%
---
108.7G
55.54G
28.06G
233.2M
72.63M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Blubster
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.15%
0.30%
0.26%
0.11%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
22.70T
5.848T
5.115T
2.088T
611.6G
151.3G
111.7G
58.29G
14.75G
8.675G
4.729G
1.180G
75.90M
---
0.85%
0.20%
0.29%
0.09%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
22.53G
5.322G
7.664G
2.479G
755.5M
323.2M
164.8M
84.40M
23.04M
72.54M
6.971M
1.657M
169.0k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
IBP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
---
1.45%
0.11%
0.11%
0.07%
0.00%
0.00%
---
28.72T
2.259T
2.123T
1.328T
65.34G
23.73G
---
1.23%
0.07%
0.19%
0.06%
0.01%
0.00%
---
32.62G
1.863G
5.164G
1.542G
162.8M
81.98M
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
X11
Port 0
AFS
MS Windows
NTP
NFS
IRC
RTIP
Telnet
SOCKS
IDENT
SNMP
AOL AIM
RPC Portmapper
---
1.22%
0.15%
0.13%
0.08%
0.06%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
24.07T
3.059T
2.559T
1.532T
1.130T
652.3G
437.6G
284.8G
274.6G
113.2G
94.97G
52.54G
39.63G
32.32G
31.84G
28.68G
1.177G
---
1.73%
0.84%
0.15%
0.08%
0.08%
0.04%
0.27%
0.14%
0.01%
0.02%
0.04%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
45.88G
22.28G
3.924G
2.099G
2.202G
1.038G
7.255G
3.732G
287.3M
521.8M
973.5M
369.6M
85.45M
80.20M
229.5M
41.59M
3.929M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.90%
0.06%
0.00%
---
17.79T
1.151T
0.000
---
0.52%
0.27%
0.00%
---
13.78G
7.109G
0.000
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
Backbone Radio
H.323 Signaling
Camarades webcams
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.29%
0.25%
0.03%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.683T
4.907T
505.9G
79.98G
75.26G
31.40G
26.80G
17.96G
0.000
---
0.19%
0.22%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.113G
5.820G
506.5M
109.1M
96.52M
48.20M
40.93M
34.35M
0.000
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
Spy Arcade
---
0.17%
0.06%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.298T
1.137T
519.3G
390.0G
123.6G
63.73G
32.01G
---
0.19%
0.08%
0.14%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.987G
2.068G
3.624G
676.1M
329.3M
107.0M
85.54M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
45.58%
---
901.0T
---
42.21%
---
1.117T
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
1.976P
---
100.00%
---
2.648T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.06% 1.151T 0.27% 7.109G
IGMP[2]0.00% 71.57M 0.00% 1.931M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 69.04G 0.00% 70.79M
TCP[6]89.96% 1.778P 85.44% 2.263T
UDP[17]8.55% 169.1T 12.95% 342.8G
IPv6[41]0.06% 1.236T 0.09% 2.395G
GRE[47]0.14% 2.756T 0.15% 3.980G
ESP[50]1.19% 23.59T 1.06% 28.06G
AX.25[93]0.00% 19.80k 0.00% 300.0
PIM[103]0.01% 168.3G 0.01% 367.5M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.02% 310.3G 0.03% 707.9M
Total100.00% 1.976P 100.00% 2.648T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)40.07% 1.061T
Medium (100-1400B)20.26% 536.6G
Large (1401-1500B)39.64% 1.049T
Jumbo (>1500B)0.03% 799.2M
Total100.00% 2.648T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.30% 1.903P 96.66% 2.560T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.13% 2.523T 0.15% 4.064G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 163.3G 0.03% 730.3M
Other3.57% 70.53T 3.16% 83.61G
Total100.00% 1.976P 100.00% 2.648T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.21% 4.109T 0.11% 3.030G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19355.52% 109.1T 5.21% 137.9G
330011.17% 23.11T 0.60% 15.83G
330021.02% 20.18T 0.52% 13.82G
164020.63% 12.36T 0.58% 15.31G
200000.62% 12.28T 0.46% 12.31G