Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20100201

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20100201 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 38.95% of octets and 19.79% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.398M 2 10.10M
5 1.493M 7 10.50M
10 1.603M 15 10.97M
50 3.236M 57 17.86M
90 16.01M 59 53.55M
95 28.58M 59 83.44M
99 90.56M 59 203.6M
99.9 286.1M 59 660.7M
99.99 743.3M 59 2.087G
99.999 1.082G 116 5.376G
100 118.2G 118 10.76G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)1.04% 5.387G
Medium (100-1400B)9.57% 49.46G
Large (1401-1500B)89.23% 461.3G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.16% 833.1M
Total100.00% 517.0G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers32.91% 244.3T 32.97% 170.4G 39.31% 9.623M
Encrypted Traffic8.30% 61.60T 8.46% 43.72G 6.15% 1.504M
Advanced Apps3.82% 28.38T 3.81% 19.67G 3.89% 951.2k
File Sharing2.99% 22.19T 2.98% 15.40G 2.24% 547.4k
Measurement2.12% 15.71T 1.69% 8.712G 0.20% 49.88k
Misc0.79% 5.873T 0.81% 4.192G 1.21% 297.1k
Games0.14% 1.074T 0.15% 769.6M 0.22% 53.84k
Audio/Video0.10% 768.1G 0.11% 550.4M 0.22% 54.51k
Unidentified48.81% 362.3T 49.03% 253.5G 46.56% 11.40M
Total100.00% 742.2T 100.00% 517.0G 100.00% 24.48M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
4.471G824419ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
4.162G824414ESnet-East [291]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.368G146420Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]Iperf
1.053G900013Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.001G150015Unknown [32361]Boston U [111]Iperf
1.001G146420Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]Iperf
988.8M150011INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Unknown [32361]Iperf
988.7M150017UIUC [38]Abilene [11537]Iperf
984.3M150010Unknown [32361]U Chicago [160]Iperf
975.4M150020UIUC [38]Argonne [683]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.414G146411Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]5041 -> 5041
1.411G146417Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]5016 -> 5016
958.4M146418Brookhaven National Lab [43]Abilene [11537]5012 -> 5012
947.7M146420MIT [3]Abilene [11537]5014 -> 5014
931.2M146411UNL [7896]Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]43892 -> 20149
925.0M150018UIUC [38]Abilene [11537]5010 -> 5010
894.4M150017Unknown [32361]VANDERBILT [7212]5010 -> 5010
832.5M146430Pennsylvania State U [3999]Abilene [11537]5011 -> 5011
788.7M146410Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]Unknown [32361]5019 -> 5019
776.2M146414Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]VANDERBILT [7212]5013 -> 5013

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 1.929k.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers42.78% 815.1T 44.33% 1.157T
Encrypted Traffic7.28% 138.7T 7.68% 200.5G
Advanced Apps2.16% 41.07T 1.64% 42.80G
Misc1.94% 36.91T 3.64% 95.12G
File Sharing1.84% 35.14T 1.46% 38.06G
Measurement0.99% 18.77T 0.72% 18.88G
Audio/Video0.47% 8.940T 0.40% 10.36G
Games0.28% 5.380T 0.46% 12.12G
Unidentified42.27% 805.5T 39.67% 1.036T
Total100.00% 1.905P 100.00% 2.612T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
40.52%
1.09%
0.97%
0.20%
---
772.1T
20.79T
18.46T
3.837T
---
42.52%
0.85%
0.68%
0.27%
---
1.110T
22.21G
17.87G
7.047G
Encrypted Traffic
HTTPS
SSH
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.34%
3.03%
0.91%
0.01%
0.00%
---
63.65T
57.65T
17.31T
127.9G
17.75G
---
4.36%
2.46%
0.85%
0.01%
0.00%
---
113.9G
64.14G
22.15G
278.7M
76.08M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
BBCP
McIDAS
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
1.50%
0.52%
0.12%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
28.66T
9.956T
2.371T
58.81G
21.67G
3.146G
---
1.25%
0.31%
0.07%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
32.61G
8.052G
1.882G
148.3M
87.23M
20.83M
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
Port 0
X11
AFS
MS Windows
NTP
IRC
RTIP
NFS
SOCKS
IDENT
Telnet
SNMP
AOL AIM
RPC Portmapper
---
1.39%
0.16%
0.12%
0.10%
0.07%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
26.41T
3.055T
2.309T
1.860T
1.398T
655.2G
438.1G
264.9G
122.8G
91.63G
79.72G
53.55G
53.13G
45.14G
32.59G
29.69G
2.389G
---
1.87%
0.91%
0.13%
0.10%
0.07%
0.04%
0.29%
0.13%
0.02%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
48.75G
23.77G
3.334G
2.706G
1.880G
1.101G
7.655G
3.474G
570.4M
910.8M
138.7M
100.1M
104.0M
349.4M
223.3M
43.24M
4.294M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Blubster
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
0.94%
0.44%
0.27%
0.12%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
17.96T
8.396T
5.234T
2.322T
831.9G
162.0G
149.0G
50.22G
15.70G
8.962G
8.266G
1.489G
1.188G
---
0.70%
0.29%
0.29%
0.11%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
18.39G
7.476G
7.703G
2.752G
979.2M
354.4M
196.5M
75.14M
29.99M
92.67M
9.746M
1.803M
1.444M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.95%
0.04%
0.00%
---
18.10T
667.7G
0.000
---
0.51%
0.22%
0.00%
---
13.22G
5.655G
0.000
Audio/Video
Real Player
Any-Source Multicast
Windows Media
Backbone Radio
H.323 Signaling
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.26%
0.18%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.862T
3.373T
473.7G
94.80G
79.30G
28.79G
15.73G
12.23G
0.000
---
0.23%
0.13%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.089G
3.478G
468.5M
127.5M
106.9M
40.01M
31.52M
27.09M
0.000
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
Spy Arcade
---
0.17%
0.06%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.148T
1.062T
552.2G
388.7G
138.5G
58.36G
31.59G
---
0.19%
0.08%
0.15%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.937G
2.017G
3.914G
679.3M
385.8M
105.2M
85.18M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
42.27%
---
805.5T
---
39.67%
---
1.036T
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
1.905P
---
100.00%
---
2.612T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.04% 667.7G 0.22% 5.655G
IGMP[2]0.00% 79.92M 0.00% 1.936M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 206.4G 0.01% 179.9M
TCP[6]90.55% 1.725P 86.14% 2.250T
UDP[17]8.22% 156.7T 12.46% 325.4G
IPv6[41]0.05% 984.4G 0.07% 1.943G
GRE[47]0.15% 2.876T 0.15% 3.896G
ESP[50]0.91% 17.31T 0.85% 22.15G
AX.25[93]0.00% 19.80k 0.00% 300.0
PIM[103]0.01% 238.6G 0.02% 487.8M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.06% 1.125T 0.09% 2.267G
Total100.00% 1.905P 100.00% 2.612T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)40.89% 1.068T
Medium (100-1400B)21.00% 548.6G
Large (1401-1500B)38.07% 994.5G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.03% 857.6M
Total100.00% 2.612T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.29% 1.835P 96.67% 2.525T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.14% 2.690T 0.16% 4.309G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 221.1G 0.03% 837.1M
Other3.55% 67.71T 3.13% 81.85G
Total100.00% 1.905P 100.00% 2.612T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.18% 3.393T 0.10% 2.553G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19355.60% 106.8T 5.19% 135.5G
330011.17% 22.22T 0.58% 15.27G
330020.83% 15.79T 0.42% 10.85G
164020.68% 13.02T 0.63% 16.35G
200000.66% 12.60T 0.48% 12.49G