Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20100125

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20100125 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 37.60% of octets and 19.09% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.395M 2 10.08M
5 1.484M 8 10.41M
10 1.587M 15 10.93M
50 3.160M 57 17.18M
90 14.62M 59 48.87M
95 26.19M 59 75.00M
99 75.06M 59 190.0M
99.9 256.2M 59 635.9M
99.99 713.8M 59 1.765G
99.999 1.107G 118 3.166G
100 28.88G 119 11.71G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)1.19% 4.909G
Medium (100-1400B)10.92% 45.11G
Large (1401-1500B)87.85% 363.0G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.05% 189.0M
Total100.00% 413.3G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers36.46% 214.1T 36.15% 149.3G 42.21% 8.683M
Encrypted Traffic7.94% 46.60T 8.21% 33.93G 5.28% 1.086M
File Sharing2.90% 17.05T 2.88% 11.89G 2.10% 432.9k
Advanced Apps2.83% 16.64T 2.80% 11.56G 3.31% 681.8k
Measurement1.51% 8.878T 1.66% 6.880G 0.16% 33.25k
Misc0.80% 4.706T 0.84% 3.452G 1.13% 232.4k
Games0.14% 795.6G 0.14% 570.1M 0.19% 38.96k
Audio/Video0.09% 501.4G 0.09% 359.0M 0.17% 35.32k
Unidentified47.33% 277.9T 47.24% 195.2G 45.44% 9.348M
Total100.00% 587.2T 100.00% 413.3G 100.00% 20.57M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
4.739G824420ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
3.634G824414ESnet-East [291]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.323G146420Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]Iperf
1.278G146420Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]Iperf
1.023G900012Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.023G900014UC Santa Cruz [5739]Abilene [11537]Iperf
997.5M150014UIUC [38]Boston U [111]Iperf
992.9M150014Unknown [32361]Boston U [111]Iperf
988.8M150011Unknown [32361]U Chicago [160]Iperf
980.4M150013UIUC [38]Abilene [11537]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.408G146415Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]5015 -> 5015
1.327G146414Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]5041 -> 5041
963.5M150013UIUC [38]Abilene [11537]5014 -> 5014
933.5M146411Brookhaven National Lab [43]Abilene [11537]5013 -> 5013
919.1M150010Unknown [32361]VANDERBILT [7212]5017 -> 5017
859.6M146412Pennsylvania State U [3999]Abilene [11537]5015 -> 5015
775.9M146411Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]Unknown [32361]5018 -> 5018
774.6M146412Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]VANDERBILT [7212]5011 -> 5011
730.1M150029Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]UNL [7896]55721 -> 33982
708.0M146420Unknown [32361]Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]5012 -> 5012

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 1.621k.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers45.54% 711.2T 47.17% 1.021T
Encrypted Traffic7.02% 109.5T 7.53% 163.0G
Misc1.82% 28.35T 3.53% 76.50G
File Sharing1.73% 27.06T 1.37% 29.68G
Advanced Apps1.71% 26.76T 1.49% 32.25G
Measurement0.71% 11.14T 0.71% 15.28G
Audio/Video0.45% 7.091T 0.38% 8.299G
Games0.26% 3.991T 0.44% 9.573G
Unidentified40.76% 636.4T 37.38% 809.3G
Total100.00% 1.561P 100.00% 2.165T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
43.56%
0.98%
0.77%
0.23%
---
680.2T
15.37T
11.95T
3.599T
---
45.61%
0.72%
0.54%
0.29%
---
987.5G
15.54G
11.75G
6.383G
Encrypted Traffic
HTTPS
SSH
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.18%
2.86%
0.96%
0.01%
0.00%
---
49.69T
44.70T
15.01T
154.8G
13.10G
---
4.28%
2.37%
0.87%
0.01%
0.00%
---
92.58G
51.22G
18.83G
321.6M
56.53M
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
Port 0
X11
AFS
MS Windows
NTP
IRC
RTIP
NFS
Telnet
SNMP
SOCKS
AOL AIM
IDENT
RPC Portmapper
---
1.30%
0.15%
0.11%
0.09%
0.08%
0.03%
0.02%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
20.27T
2.388T
1.733T
1.334T
1.261T
401.2G
370.3G
249.2G
75.15G
69.06G
57.66G
48.08G
24.84G
21.76G
19.68G
19.47G
241.0M
---
1.79%
0.87%
0.12%
0.09%
0.08%
0.07%
0.28%
0.15%
0.02%
0.03%
0.00%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
38.72G
18.76G
2.680G
1.897G
1.665G
1.575G
6.131G
3.275G
358.4M
674.0M
107.3M
333.1M
175.4M
37.55M
30.56M
66.48M
2.219M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Neo-Modus
Freenet
Blubster
Direct Connect++
---
0.93%
0.41%
0.21%
0.13%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
14.48T
6.379T
3.283T
2.098T
565.5G
108.5G
98.02G
29.03G
9.634G
6.894G
3.736G
3.220G
144.5M
---
0.69%
0.26%
0.26%
0.12%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
14.91G
5.565G
5.575G
2.502G
648.5M
217.2M
144.1M
48.85M
17.46M
6.772M
5.207M
35.03M
272.9k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
1.49%
0.11%
0.11%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
23.28T
1.753T
1.647T
46.83G
24.72G
1.459G
---
1.24%
0.06%
0.18%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
26.83G
1.388G
3.833G
119.1M
75.12M
3.737M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.68%
0.04%
0.00%
---
10.58T
564.3G
2.098M
---
0.48%
0.23%
0.00%
---
10.29G
4.989G
1.600k
Audio/Video
Real Player
Any-Source Multicast
Windows Media
Backbone Radio
H.323 Signaling
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.23%
0.19%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.602T
2.965T
321.9G
73.19G
72.29G
33.41G
17.41G
5.719G
0.000
---
0.22%
0.13%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.817G
2.884G
316.8M
101.0M
92.79M
44.54M
27.45M
14.35M
0.000
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Asheron
Spy Arcade
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.16%
0.04%
0.03%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.537T
572.8G
484.9G
242.3G
74.42G
42.37G
37.66G
---
0.18%
0.06%
0.15%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.964G
1.341G
3.253G
663.6M
172.0M
104.9M
73.35M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
40.76%
---
636.4T
---
37.38%
---
809.3G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
1.561P
---
100.00%
---
2.165T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.04% 564.3G 0.23% 4.989G
IGMP[2]0.00% 67.12M 0.00% 1.775M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 192.0G 0.01% 162.0M
TCP[6]91.11% 1.422P 87.48% 1.894T
UDP[17]7.43% 116.0T 11.00% 238.2G
IPv6[41]0.04% 635.5G 0.06% 1.284G
GRE[47]0.35% 5.430T 0.26% 5.602G
ESP[50]0.96% 15.01T 0.87% 18.83G
AX.25[93]0.00% 2.433M 0.00% 2.100k
PIM[103]0.01% 138.0G 0.01% 312.3M
IPMP[169]0.00% 2.098M 0.00% 1.600k
Other0.05% 806.0G 0.07% 1.616G
Total100.00% 1.561P 100.00% 2.165T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)41.84% 905.9G
Medium (100-1400B)20.57% 445.4G
Large (1401-1500B)37.53% 812.6G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.05% 1.163G
Total100.00% 2.165T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.17% 1.501P 96.66% 2.093T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.20% 3.056T 0.19% 4.022G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 140.4G 0.02% 528.2M
Other3.62% 56.55T 3.13% 67.66G
Total100.00% 1.561P 100.00% 2.165T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.27% 4.271T 0.15% 3.149G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19356.31% 98.54T 5.89% 127.5G
330011.02% 15.95T 0.51% 10.96G
330020.78% 12.18T 0.39% 8.378G
270300.72% 11.25T 0.56% 12.09G
164020.71% 11.04T 0.63% 13.69G