Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20100118

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20100118 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 38.31% of octets and 19.60% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.393M 2 10.08M
5 1.480M 7 10.39M
10 1.581M 14 10.83M
50 3.180M 57 17.04M
90 16.56M 59 49.58M
95 30.09M 59 77.00M
99 88.98M 59 215.3M
99.9 245.4M 59 688.0M
99.99 821.1M 98 2.154G
99.999 1.424G 118 3.854G
100 75.84G 119 11.46G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)1.71% 6.779G
Medium (100-1400B)10.07% 39.91G
Large (1401-1500B)88.16% 349.5G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.06% 245.8M
Total100.00% 396.4G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers35.07% 197.4T 34.63% 137.3G 42.75% 8.141M
Encrypted Traffic7.34% 41.29T 7.89% 31.29G 4.51% 859.0k
Advanced Apps3.00% 16.85T 2.96% 11.73G 3.59% 683.9k
File Sharing2.94% 16.57T 2.90% 11.50G 2.07% 394.7k
Measurement2.12% 11.95T 2.35% 9.328G 0.20% 38.61k
Misc0.92% 5.196T 0.94% 3.743G 1.36% 259.9k
Games0.13% 758.6G 0.14% 537.8M 0.18% 34.91k
Audio/Video0.09% 484.7G 0.09% 346.9M 0.17% 33.29k
Unidentified48.39% 272.3T 48.09% 190.6G 45.15% 8.598M
Total100.00% 562.8T 100.00% 396.4G 100.00% 19.04M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
4.712G824416ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
3.676G824411ESnet-East [291]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.358G146414Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]Iperf
1.052G900016UC Santa Cruz [5739]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.039G146419Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]Iperf
997.7M150011Unknown [32361]U Chicago [160]Iperf
984.2M150012UIUC [38]Abilene [11537]Iperf
972.7M150018Unknown [32361]Boston U [111]Iperf
972.4M150015UIUC [38]Argonne [683]Iperf
971.3M146411INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Unknown [32361]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.400G146420Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]5065 -> 5065
1.381G146417Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]5094 -> 5094
1.109G150012Unknown [32361]U Chicago [160]58793 -> 24682
941.1M150010UCLA [52]Abilene [11537]55987 -> 3002
915.9M150020UIUC [38]Abilene [11537]5017 -> 5017
910.9M146417Pennsylvania State U [3999]Abilene [11537]5017 -> 5017
852.2M146120Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]SDSC [195]5010 -> 5010
849.0M150011UNIVHAWAII [6360]Abilene [11537]39680 -> 3002
843.8M146460Unknown [32440]NCSA [1224]35330 -> 55889
812.4M150016Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]UNL [7896]54313 -> 53896

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 1.481k.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers45.98% 675.5T 47.29% 956.6G
Encrypted Traffic6.64% 97.61T 7.39% 149.4G
Advanced Apps1.84% 27.04T 1.55% 31.32G
Misc1.75% 25.68T 3.46% 70.05G
File Sharing1.72% 25.24T 1.48% 29.95G
Measurement0.93% 13.70T 0.87% 17.50G
Audio/Video0.66% 9.766T 0.49% 9.880G
Games0.26% 3.787T 0.46% 9.307G
Unidentified40.22% 590.8T 37.01% 748.6G
Total100.00% 1.469P 100.00% 2.022T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
44.13%
1.02%
0.58%
0.25%
---
648.3T
15.04T
8.455T
3.663T
---
45.74%
0.77%
0.44%
0.34%
---
925.2G
15.51G
8.991G
6.874G
Encrypted Traffic
HTTPS
SSH
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.01%
2.73%
0.89%
0.01%
0.00%
---
44.26T
40.05T
13.13T
137.1G
12.69G
---
4.11%
2.42%
0.84%
0.01%
0.00%
---
83.13G
49.00G
16.99G
291.4M
55.02M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
1.65%
0.12%
0.06%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
24.27T
1.778T
911.3G
53.10G
20.24G
826.1M
---
1.38%
0.07%
0.09%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
27.93G
1.412G
1.781G
122.5M
70.70M
1.606M
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
X11
Port 0
AFS
MS Windows
NTP
IRC
RTIP
NFS
Telnet
SNMP
SOCKS
AOL AIM
IDENT
RPC Portmapper
---
1.25%
0.15%
0.10%
0.07%
0.06%
0.04%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
18.42T
2.228T
1.540T
1.058T
910.1G
575.6G
345.5G
243.5G
121.8G
72.25G
58.52G
33.80G
24.16G
23.34G
21.82G
3.218G
256.8M
---
1.79%
0.82%
0.12%
0.08%
0.08%
0.04%
0.29%
0.16%
0.02%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
36.27G
16.62G
2.344G
1.541G
1.632G
832.8M
5.764G
3.195G
460.7M
697.7M
107.4M
274.2M
169.0M
46.07M
32.74M
40.39M
2.410M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Freenet
Blubster
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
0.91%
0.46%
0.19%
0.10%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
13.35T
6.819T
2.790T
1.480T
539.6G
118.1G
93.77G
30.65G
7.832G
5.148G
2.473G
1.464G
7.380M
---
0.68%
0.30%
0.36%
0.09%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
13.80G
6.035G
7.293G
1.751G
621.3M
214.6M
138.2M
46.90M
15.00M
6.470M
27.31M
2.476M
60.80k
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.89%
0.04%
0.00%
---
13.13T
567.9G
1.903M
---
0.61%
0.25%
0.00%
---
12.39G
5.101G
1.300k
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
Backbone Radio
H.323 Signaling
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.43%
0.21%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.264T
3.046T
281.0G
64.42G
64.17G
22.83G
15.99G
6.770G
0.000
---
0.27%
0.20%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.387G
3.968G
281.8M
87.79M
82.66M
32.58M
25.36M
14.19M
0.000
Games
DirectX
Half-Life
Battlenet
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
Spy Arcade
---
0.17%
0.04%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.429T
527.4G
506.3G
211.8G
50.37G
42.99G
19.00G
---
0.18%
0.18%
0.06%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.662G
3.694G
1.255G
435.8M
114.5M
74.52M
69.96M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
40.22%
---
590.8T
---
37.01%
---
748.6G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
1.469P
---
100.00%
---
2.022T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.04% 567.9G 0.25% 5.101G
IGMP[2]0.00% 72.53M 0.00% 1.918M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 189.0G 0.01% 157.4M
TCP[6]91.57% 1.345P 87.80% 1.776T
UDP[17]7.00% 102.8T 10.66% 215.7G
IPv6[41]0.05% 666.7G 0.06% 1.277G
GRE[47]0.38% 5.572T 0.29% 5.841G
ESP[50]0.89% 13.13T 0.84% 16.99G
AX.25[93]0.00% 2.661M 0.00% 2.200k
PIM[103]0.01% 115.1G 0.01% 260.7M
IPMP[169]0.00% 1.903M 0.00% 1.300k
Other0.05% 675.8G 0.07% 1.373G
Total100.00% 1.469P 100.00% 2.022T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)42.11% 851.7G
Medium (100-1400B)19.79% 400.2G
Large (1401-1500B)38.03% 769.3G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.07% 1.474G
Total100.00% 2.022T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.59% 1.419P 97.06% 1.963T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.18% 2.716T 0.17% 3.415G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 92.02G 0.02% 382.3M
Other3.22% 47.36T 2.75% 55.68G
Total100.00% 1.469P 100.00% 2.022T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.50% 7.337T 0.26% 5.233G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19356.28% 92.19T 6.02% 121.8G
150000.75% 10.96T 0.68% 13.76G
164020.60% 8.767T 0.53% 10.69G
330010.57% 8.436T 0.29% 5.962G
270300.52% 7.688T 0.44% 8.951G