Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20091214

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20091214 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 43.18% of octets and 22.69% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.397M 2 10.10M
5 1.498M 8 10.50M
10 1.618M 15 11.07M
50 3.317M 58 18.17M
90 17.25M 59 60.46M
95 30.29M 59 98.55M
99 83.30M 59 248.2M
99.9 198.2M 59 709.2M
99.99 655.2M 60 2.254G
99.999 1.261G 118 5.246G
100 23.04G 119 19.19G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)1.00% 4.354G
Medium (100-1400B)7.36% 31.94G
Large (1401-1500B)91.55% 397.4G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.09% 392.6M
Total100.00% 434.1G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers26.87% 168.0T 27.12% 117.7G 34.37% 6.477M
Encrypted Traffic7.84% 49.03T 8.11% 35.21G 5.88% 1.108M
File Sharing3.63% 22.70T 3.59% 15.57G 2.74% 515.4k
Advanced Apps2.86% 17.86T 2.86% 12.41G 4.26% 803.5k
Measurement1.63% 10.21T 1.57% 6.809G 0.18% 34.58k
Misc0.56% 3.516T 0.60% 2.588G 0.98% 184.4k
Games0.13% 831.5G 0.14% 591.8M 0.19% 35.47k
Audio/Video0.07% 454.7G 0.07% 324.2M 0.17% 31.89k
Unidentified56.40% 352.7T 55.95% 242.9G 51.22% 9.652M
Total100.00% 625.4T 100.00% 434.1G 100.00% 18.84M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
8.009G900017Universiy of California, San Diego CA [7377]Abilene [11537]Iperf
4.975G824419ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
3.567G824415ESnet-East [291]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.394G146411Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]Iperf
1.033G900018Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.031G900020UNL [7896]UIUC [38]Iperf
1.030G900017UIUC [38]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.007G900013UIUC [38]Argonne [683]Iperf
1.003G150015Unknown [32361]U Chicago [160]Iperf
997.3M146420Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.411G146417Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]5069 -> 5069
1.334G146417Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]5049 -> 5049
988.8M146911Unknown [32361]VANDERBILT [7212]5015 -> 5015
962.2M900016UIUC [38]Abilene [11537]5013 -> 5013
950.5M148620Unknown [32361]Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]5017 -> 5017
755.5M146411VANDERBILT [7212]Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]5013 -> 5013
747.3M150020Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]Unknown [32361]5017 -> 5017
711.9M146411U Florida [6356]Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]5011 -> 5011
708.1M150059Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]UNL [7896]48603 -> 43716
704.6M150014Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]SDSC [195]5011 -> 5011

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 1.503k.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers41.37% 599.1T 43.69% 836.0G
Encrypted Traffic7.19% 104.0T 7.82% 149.7G
File Sharing2.11% 30.53T 1.63% 31.25G
Advanced Apps1.96% 28.31T 1.54% 29.48G
Misc1.55% 22.51T 3.72% 71.28G
Measurement0.85% 12.38T 0.80% 15.25G
Audio/Video0.45% 6.529T 0.48% 9.096G
Games0.24% 3.506T 0.43% 8.212G
Unidentified44.28% 641.2T 39.88% 763.2G
Total100.00% 1.448P 100.00% 1.913T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
39.13%
1.18%
0.86%
0.20%
---
566.6T
17.14T
12.38T
2.939T
---
41.81%
0.93%
0.67%
0.28%
---
800.0G
17.76G
12.85G
5.403G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.20%
2.78%
1.20%
0.01%
0.00%
---
46.38T
40.25T
17.35T
87.61G
12.80G
---
2.71%
3.99%
1.11%
0.01%
0.00%
---
51.92G
76.40G
21.14G
206.9M
53.44M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Freenet
Blubster
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.27%
0.53%
0.17%
0.10%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
18.33T
7.632T
2.514T
1.382T
426.9G
92.76G
87.54G
46.59G
12.33G
2.184G
1.251G
258.4M
7.885M
---
0.93%
0.35%
0.22%
0.09%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
17.74G
6.723G
4.234G
1.629G
517.1M
173.9M
128.2M
61.79M
22.04M
3.404M
14.86M
1.745M
74.60k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
1.73%
0.13%
0.09%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
25.11T
1.845T
1.286T
55.84G
13.26G
1.245G
---
1.39%
0.08%
0.06%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
26.61G
1.444G
1.213G
153.6M
59.53M
2.953M
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
X11
Port 0
MS Windows
NTP
AFS
RTIP
IRC
NFS
Telnet
IDENT
SNMP
SOCKS
AOL AIM
RPC Portmapper
---
1.10%
0.16%
0.12%
0.05%
0.04%
0.02%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
15.91T
2.279T
1.771T
755.7G
616.0G
350.0G
248.7G
217.5G
94.05G
87.14G
52.42G
38.50G
32.75G
21.54G
18.60G
17.23G
273.4M
---
1.70%
1.13%
0.15%
0.06%
0.07%
0.32%
0.17%
0.04%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
32.53G
21.56G
2.901G
1.152G
1.364G
6.058G
3.274G
674.8M
837.7M
336.4M
104.1M
174.1M
89.93M
150.1M
35.46M
22.01M
2.094M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.81%
0.04%
0.00%
---
11.78T
601.7G
0.000
---
0.52%
0.27%
0.00%
---
9.991G
5.261G
0.000
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.23%
0.19%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.264T
2.815T
268.2G
78.65G
54.31G
26.98G
13.50G
7.886G
0.000
---
0.25%
0.20%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.706G
3.855G
272.6M
113.4M
78.34M
37.17M
20.82M
12.42M
0.000
Games
DirectX
Half-Life
Battlenet
Quake
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
Spy Arcade
---
0.16%
0.03%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.330T
452.2G
411.6G
167.3G
69.66G
39.23G
35.73G
---
0.17%
0.16%
0.05%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
3.347G
2.994G
953.7M
388.0M
355.6M
97.25M
75.98M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
44.28%
---
641.2T
---
39.88%
---
763.2G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
1.448P
---
100.00%
---
1.913T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.04% 601.7G 0.27% 5.261G
IGMP[2]0.00% 70.52M 0.00% 1.900M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 192.8G 0.01% 168.2M
TCP[6]91.64% 1.327P 87.62% 1.676T
UDP[17]6.01% 87.03T 10.15% 194.2G
IPv6[41]0.05% 705.5G 0.06% 1.187G
GRE[47]1.01% 14.66T 0.73% 13.91G
ESP[50]1.20% 17.35T 1.11% 21.14G
AX.25[93]0.00% 26.40k 0.00% 400.0
PIM[103]0.00% 4.023G 0.00% 52.38M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.03% 457.0G 0.05% 889.5M
Total100.00% 1.448P 100.00% 1.913T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)41.02% 785.0G
Medium (100-1400B)17.69% 338.5G
Large (1401-1500B)41.01% 784.7G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.28% 5.413G
Total100.00% 1.913T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.02% 1.390P 96.59% 1.848T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.17% 2.533T 0.18% 3.484G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 74.44G 0.02% 306.9M
Other3.80% 55.02T 3.21% 61.52G
Total100.00% 1.448P 100.00% 1.913T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.31% 4.539T 0.17% 3.311G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19355.92% 85.72T 5.75% 110.1G
330011.08% 15.57T 0.56% 10.72G
200000.81% 11.71T 0.59% 11.26G
330020.80% 11.55T 0.42% 7.943G
150000.58% 8.346T 0.60% 11.43G