Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20091012

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20091012 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, data for the following day(s) were missing: Saturday, Sunday. We multiplied all nominal quantities by 7/5 to estimate the amounts of various types of traffic. Percentages and distributions were not modified.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 35.97% of octets and 18.30% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.399M 2 10.08M
5 1.494M 7 10.49M
10 1.604M 14 10.95M
50 3.161M 57 17.42M
90 16.19M 59 51.00M
95 29.76M 59 79.93M
99 87.84M 59 221.3M
99.9 235.1M 59 771.3M
99.99 608.9M 60 1.773G
99.999 1.800G 116 2.889G
100 10.13G 117 10.63G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)3.16% 13.07G
Medium (100-1400B)11.31% 46.82G
Large (1401-1500B)85.51% 354.0G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.02% 103.0M
Total100.00% 414.0G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers30.71% 177.6T 30.05% 124.4G 39.34% 7.548M
Encrypted Traffic6.89% 39.86T 6.88% 28.49G 5.83% 1.119M
Advanced Apps3.74% 21.64T 3.64% 15.06G 4.79% 919.1k
Measurement3.66% 21.18T 4.83% 19.99G 1.81% 348.1k
File Sharing3.14% 18.15T 3.09% 12.80G 2.14% 409.9k
Misc0.73% 4.217T 0.74% 3.068G 1.17% 224.9k
Games0.14% 803.3G 0.14% 586.2M 0.19% 36.29k
Audio/Video0.14% 784.5G 0.14% 561.3M 0.29% 56.60k
Unidentified50.85% 294.1T 50.49% 209.0G 44.43% 8.526M
Total100.00% 578.5T 100.00% 414.0G 100.00% 19.18M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
4.379G824419ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
3.709G824416ESnet-East [291]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.620G139514Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]Iperf
1.414G146456Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.265G137320Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]Iperf
988.6M150010Unknown [32361]SDSC [195]Iperf
963.8M150020Unknown [32361]U Wisconsin [59]Iperf
956.5M150015Unknown [32361]Boston U [111]Iperf
949.7M146410Boston U [111]Unknown [32361]Iperf
929.3M150020U Wisconsin [59]Abilene [11537]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.708G138920Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]BBFTP
1.678G137220Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]BBFTP
977.1M150019Unknown [32361]SDSC [195]5011 -> 5011
864.6M146429Unknown [0]Abilene [11537]5014 -> 5014
826.5M146430Pennsylvania State U [3999]Abilene [11537]5010 -> 5010
822.7M150011UNL [7896]Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]51345 -> 21762
809.5M149312Unknown [32361]U Chicago [160]50977 -> 21204
788.4M149520Unknown [32361]VANDERBILT [7212]5012 -> 5012
696.0M146459Abilene [11537]UMDNET [27]Shoutcast
675.3M146411VANDERBILT [7212]Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]5012 -> 5012

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 1.514k.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers47.22% 759.3T 49.24% 1.114T
Encrypted Traffic5.84% 93.90T 6.38% 144.2G
Advanced Apps2.15% 34.58T 1.58% 35.63G
Misc1.74% 27.98T 3.61% 81.68G
File Sharing1.70% 27.38T 1.35% 30.54G
Measurement1.47% 23.72T 1.28% 28.85G
Audio/Video0.54% 8.641T 0.45% 10.24G
Games0.27% 4.316T 0.47% 10.63G
Unidentified39.07% 628.3T 35.65% 806.6G
Total100.00% 1.608P 100.00% 2.262T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
45.21%
0.99%
0.73%
0.29%
---
727.1T
15.85T
11.70T
4.708T
---
47.58%
0.73%
0.56%
0.37%
---
1.076T
16.45G
12.72G
8.377G
Encrypted Traffic
HTTPS
SSH
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.84%
2.37%
0.62%
0.01%
0.00%
---
45.73T
38.05T
9.995T
105.1G
13.92G
---
3.70%
2.09%
0.57%
0.01%
0.00%
---
83.71G
47.33G
12.91G
239.0M
60.76M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
IBP
BBFTP
GsiFTP
---
1.97%
0.13%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
31.70T
2.082T
490.3G
178.2G
62.78G
61.82G
---
1.46%
0.07%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
---
33.12G
1.671G
421.2M
168.0M
112.7M
141.8M
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
X11
Port 0
MS Windows
NTP
AFS
IRC
RTIP
NFS
Telnet
AOL AIM
SNMP
SOCKS
IDENT
RPC Portmapper
---
1.25%
0.15%
0.12%
0.07%
0.06%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
20.07T
2.479T
1.989T
1.149T
1.041T
390.4G
269.1G
217.3G
84.62G
66.75G
63.00G
50.00G
45.33G
28.97G
25.14G
9.282G
1.110G
---
1.77%
0.95%
0.16%
0.07%
0.09%
0.30%
0.16%
0.03%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.02%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
40.10G
21.53G
3.618G
1.598G
2.108G
6.733G
3.536G
674.0M
384.7M
560.6M
121.1M
398.7M
52.88M
154.2M
47.66M
47.47M
3.701M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Freenet
Carracho
Blubster
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
0.99%
0.34%
0.20%
0.11%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
15.99T
5.436T
3.251T
1.790T
575.9G
148.1G
126.1G
44.03G
10.80G
5.635G
3.538G
347.2M
30.53M
---
0.75%
0.21%
0.24%
0.09%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
16.96G
4.819G
5.322G
2.099G
701.8M
318.6M
183.7M
61.28M
12.49M
10.81M
45.85M
2.060M
76.86k
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
1.45%
0.04%
0.00%
---
23.30T
590.3G
0.000
---
1.11%
0.23%
0.00%
---
25.05G
5.312G
0.000
Audio/Video
Real Player
Any-Source Multicast
Windows Media
Backbone Radio
H.323 Signaling
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.35%
0.15%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.639T
2.438T
351.6G
85.82G
73.57G
25.63G
17.54G
9.172G
0.000
---
0.31%
0.11%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.116G
2.421G
404.6M
116.8M
98.72M
35.67M
31.23M
19.35M
0.000
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
Spy Arcade
---
0.16%
0.04%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.575T
720.9G
580.0G
289.3G
83.41G
47.29G
20.64G
---
0.18%
0.06%
0.17%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
---
4.160G
1.429G
3.928G
702.2M
151.4M
90.61M
172.6M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
39.07%
---
628.3T
---
35.65%
---
806.6G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
1.608P
---
100.00%
---
2.262T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.04% 590.3G 0.23% 5.312G
IGMP[2]0.00% 58.88M 0.00% 1.576M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 234.6G 0.01% 192.9M
TCP[6]91.01% 1.463P 88.33% 1.998T
UDP[17]6.78% 109.0T 9.89% 223.6G
IPv6[41]0.04% 584.6G 0.04% 980.1M
GRE[47]1.48% 23.81T 0.95% 21.47G
ESP[50]0.62% 9.995T 0.57% 12.91G
AX.25[93]0.00% 41.16k 0.00% 560.0
PIM[103]0.00% 4.261G 0.00% 55.46M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.03% 442.6G 0.04% 894.6M
Total100.00% 1.608P 100.00% 2.262T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)43.35% 980.7G
Medium (100-1400B)19.84% 448.8G
Large (1401-1500B)36.63% 828.7G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.19% 4.291G
Total100.00% 2.262T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]97.54% 1.568P 97.65% 2.209T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.19% 3.018T 0.19% 4.191G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 71.87G 0.02% 347.2M
Other2.27% 36.44T 2.15% 48.71G
Total100.00% 1.608P 100.00% 2.262T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.19% 3.042T 0.10% 2.329G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19352.97% 47.69T 3.40% 77.01G
164020.82% 13.16T 0.71% 15.95G
150000.50% 8.106T 0.48% 10.94G
200000.36% 5.830T 0.26% 5.770G
270300.26% 4.120T 0.20% 4.599G