Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20091005

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20091005 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, data for the following day(s) were missing: Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday, Sunday. We multiplied all nominal quantities by 7/2 to estimate the amounts of various types of traffic. Percentages and distributions were not modified.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 36.83% of octets and 18.93% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.393M 2 10.08M
5 1.475M 7 10.39M
10 1.569M 15 10.83M
50 3.002M 57 16.54M
90 15.44M 59 50.69M
95 27.22M 59 83.44M
99 79.23M 59 193.8M
99.9 217.5M 59 727.1M
99.99 428.1M 102 1.832G
99.999 1.484G 108 2.712G
100 23.74G 108 11.17G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)3.62% 15.80G
Medium (100-1400B)11.56% 50.52G
Large (1401-1500B)84.80% 370.6G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.02% 101.6M
Total100.00% 437.1G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers31.13% 189.6T 30.31% 132.4G 37.99% 7.972M
Encrypted Traffic5.88% 35.81T 5.78% 25.28G 5.14% 1.077M
Measurement5.52% 33.60T 6.72% 29.35G 6.56% 1.376M
Advanced Apps3.30% 20.12T 3.20% 14.00G 4.09% 858.3k
File Sharing2.90% 17.64T 2.87% 12.54G 1.85% 388.5k
Misc0.71% 4.296T 0.71% 3.107G 1.12% 235.5k
Games0.20% 1.239T 0.20% 892.9M 0.28% 57.95k
Audio/Video0.14% 866.9G 0.14% 611.7M 0.29% 61.07k
Unidentified50.23% 306.0T 50.06% 218.8G 42.68% 8.956M
Total100.00% 609.3T 100.00% 437.1G 100.00% 20.98M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
4.516G824420ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
3.539G824417ESnet-East [291]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.661G137216Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]Iperf
874.0M146420Pennsylvania State U [3999]Abilene [11537]Iperf
822.6M150020Unknown [32361]Boston U [111]Iperf
720.7M146411Unknown [0]Unknown [25776]Iperf
685.7M145912VANDERBILT [7212]Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]Iperf
679.5M146420NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]NIST-BOULDER [2648]Iperf
658.8M146430Indiana [87]Abilene [11537]Iperf
627.1M149020Unknown [32361]VANDERBILT [7212]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.684G139621Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]5065 -> 5065
1.437G137420Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]5091 -> 5091
875.7M146420Pennsylvania State U [3999]Abilene [11537]5016 -> 5016
806.4M149621Unknown [32361]VANDERBILT [7212]5016 -> 5016
757.4M150011Unknown [32361]Universiy of California, San Diego CA [7377]40847 -> 60882
609.3M146416VANDERBILT [7212]Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]5016 -> 5016
595.3M149913U Kansas [2496]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]1023 -> 988
575.4M150025UNL [7896]Unknown [32361]44424 -> 40218
572.0M150029Unknown [32361]UNL [7896]37434 -> 36529
556.3M150020SDSC [195]Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]5015 -> 5015

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 1.676k.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers47.58% 787.1T 48.67% 1.123T
Encrypted Traffic5.49% 90.75T 6.02% 138.9G
Measurement2.56% 42.31T 2.33% 53.77G
Advanced Apps1.97% 32.55T 1.50% 34.52G
Misc1.82% 30.05T 4.18% 96.55G
File Sharing1.62% 26.77T 1.30% 29.98G
Audio/Video0.72% 11.98T 0.57% 13.25G
Games0.29% 4.801T 0.49% 11.38G
Unidentified37.96% 627.9T 34.94% 806.6G
Total100.00% 1.654P 100.00% 2.308T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
45.19%
1.16%
1.02%
0.21%
---
747.6T
19.20T
16.86T
3.465T
---
46.91%
0.79%
0.67%
0.30%
---
1.083T
18.31G
15.48G
6.862G
Encrypted Traffic
HTTPS
SSH
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.86%
1.98%
0.63%
0.01%
0.00%
---
47.39T
32.80T
10.43T
107.1G
17.51G
---
3.71%
1.73%
0.56%
0.01%
0.00%
---
85.71G
40.05G
12.87G
233.8M
63.93M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
2.52%
0.12%
0.00%
---
41.73T
2.030T
0.000
---
2.07%
0.90%
0.00%
---
47.86G
20.68G
0.000
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
IBP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
---
1.78%
0.11%
0.04%
0.03%
0.00%
0.00%
---
29.49T
1.780T
697.3G
512.2G
62.74G
12.41G
---
1.34%
0.06%
0.05%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
---
30.84G
1.446G
1.209G
781.1M
180.5M
59.04M
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
X11
Port 0
MS Windows
AFS
NTP
IRC
NFS
RTIP
SOCKS
AOL AIM
Telnet
IDENT
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
---
1.32%
0.19%
0.11%
0.08%
0.04%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
21.76T
3.162T
1.885T
1.400T
621.4G
358.1G
354.7G
144.6G
80.96G
59.58G
59.26G
43.67G
42.72G
26.94G
21.21G
19.44G
208.2M
---
1.81%
1.60%
0.16%
0.08%
0.06%
0.28%
0.04%
0.08%
0.02%
0.00%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
---
41.71G
36.97G
3.681G
1.872G
1.467G
6.511G
826.2M
1.900G
391.3M
114.5M
483.7M
74.80M
54.72M
281.4M
58.79M
150.0M
2.056M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Freenet
Blubster
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
0.93%
0.34%
0.18%
0.11%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
15.40T
5.669T
3.013T
1.864T
461.5G
151.8G
143.7G
44.75G
9.982G
8.053G
3.673G
247.8M
9.156M
---
0.72%
0.22%
0.22%
0.09%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
16.56G
5.003G
5.002G
2.153G
572.8M
355.0M
194.9M
59.40M
17.81M
9.242M
48.79M
1.412M
60.20k
Audio/Video
Real Player
Any-Source Multicast
Windows Media
Backbone Radio
H.323 Signaling
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.41%
0.27%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.821T
4.542T
375.5G
114.2G
62.02G
41.13G
21.01G
9.814G
0.000
---
0.37%
0.18%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.441G
4.054G
421.4M
148.7M
93.33M
49.80M
26.60M
21.15M
0.000
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
Spy Arcade
---
0.18%
0.04%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.009T
708.1G
569.9G
316.0G
83.07G
75.95G
38.78G
---
0.20%
0.06%
0.17%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.02%
---
4.588G
1.394G
3.868G
705.2M
153.9M
137.3M
538.4M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
37.96%
---
627.9T
---
34.94%
---
806.6G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
1.654P
---
100.00%
---
2.308T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.12% 2.030T 0.90% 20.68G
IGMP[2]0.00% 60.59M 0.00% 1.612M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.02% 278.9G 0.01% 224.9M
TCP[6]91.51% 1.513P 88.23% 2.037T
UDP[17]6.38% 105.4T 10.02% 231.3G
IPv6[41]0.03% 570.3G 0.04% 974.1M
GRE[47]1.37% 22.67T 0.85% 19.73G
ESP[50]0.63% 10.43T 0.56% 12.87G
AX.25[93]0.00% 113.4k 0.00% 1.400k
PIM[103]0.00% 4.304G 0.00% 57.41M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.02% 412.1G 0.03% 799.0M
Total100.00% 1.654P 100.00% 2.308T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)43.03% 993.5G
Medium (100-1400B)19.87% 458.6G
Large (1401-1500B)37.03% 855.0G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.07% 1.687G
Total100.00% 2.308T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]97.25% 1.608P 97.42% 2.249T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.17% 2.756T 0.17% 3.867G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 88.36G 0.02% 402.4M
Other2.57% 42.58T 2.39% 55.21G
Total100.00% 1.654P 100.00% 2.308T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.16% 2.680T 0.09% 2.024G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19351.14% 18.87T 1.25% 28.92G
164020.35% 5.869T 0.31% 7.159G
600110.16% 2.655T 0.12% 2.762G
150000.15% 2.500T 0.15% 3.392G
200000.13% 2.186T 0.09% 2.159G