Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20090622

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20090622 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 40.72% of octets and 20.72% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.389M 3 10.06M
5 1.480M 9 10.44M
10 1.591M 17 10.94M
50 3.135M 58 17.45M
90 13.12M 59 50.10M
95 21.96M 59 78.00M
99 62.87M 59 202.6M
99.9 210.2M 59 901.5M
99.99 923.4M 59 3.123G
99.999 5.632G 59 10.63G
100 29.10G 63 58.82G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)2.84% 5.692G
Medium (100-1400B)9.24% 18.51G
Large (1401-1500B)87.70% 175.8G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.23% 452.1M
Total100.00% 200.4G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers35.25% 100.6T 34.93% 70.01G 43.81% 4.110M
Encrypted Traffic9.56% 27.31T 9.78% 19.61G 8.16% 765.8k
Measurement6.74% 19.24T 7.35% 14.72G 3.10% 291.0k
Advanced Apps4.95% 14.13T 4.87% 9.753G 5.68% 533.2k
File Sharing2.35% 6.700T 2.35% 4.711G 1.86% 174.7k
Misc0.84% 2.388T 0.92% 1.840G 1.45% 136.3k
Games0.19% 533.1G 0.19% 379.5M 0.27% 25.66k
Audio/Video0.15% 427.7G 0.15% 309.1M 0.31% 28.73k
Unidentified39.99% 114.2T 39.47% 79.11G 35.35% 3.316M
Total100.00% 285.6T 100.00% 200.4G 100.00% 9.382M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
8.422G900049Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
8.135G819418Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]Iperf
7.556G900020Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]Iperf
4.823G824412ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
4.408G824420ESnet-East [291]Abilene [11537]Iperf
996.7M149912Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]VANDERBILT [7212]Iperf
987.3M150010Unknown [32361]U Wisconsin [59]Iperf
946.6M149919Unknown [32361]Boston U [111]Iperf
904.6M900010AMES-NAS [24]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf
848.0M150010U Wisconsin [59]Merit [237]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
8.222G872520Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]5050 -> 5050
7.897G817815Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]5079 -> 5079
1.012G900040Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]5011 -> 5011
982.2M150010Unknown [25776]Brookhaven National Lab [43]52335 -> 20000
979.4M150015Unknown [25776]ESnet-East [291]5043 -> 5043
680.5M149610U Kansas [2496]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]1020 -> 988
665.8M150013Unknown [25776]ESnet-West [292]5019 -> 5019
557.5M150011Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]UNL [7896]45986 -> 37440
556.3M150018Merit [237]Abilene [11537]5017 -> 5017
519.8M150014Unknown [32440]NCSA [1224]54303 -> 50389

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 758.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers43.69% 306.5T 43.10% 416.9G
Encrypted Traffic8.47% 59.44T 8.61% 83.32G
Measurement3.58% 25.10T 2.78% 26.90G
Advanced Apps3.45% 24.21T 2.80% 27.04G
Misc2.44% 17.12T 5.64% 54.54G
File Sharing1.83% 12.85T 1.72% 16.60G
Audio/Video0.88% 6.142T 0.77% 7.485G
Games0.32% 2.253T 0.46% 4.450G
Unidentified35.34% 247.9T 34.12% 330.0G
Total100.00% 701.6T 100.00% 967.3G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
40.62%
2.02%
0.58%
0.46%
---
285.0T
14.14T
4.101T
3.239T
---
40.48%
1.46%
0.60%
0.56%
---
391.5G
14.14G
5.825G
5.407G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.90%
3.46%
1.10%
0.01%
0.00%
---
27.38T
24.25T
7.713T
74.75G
11.28G
---
3.69%
3.87%
1.03%
0.02%
0.01%
---
35.69G
37.39G
10.00G
182.4M
50.93M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
3.53%
0.05%
0.00%
---
24.76T
338.7G
0.000
---
2.51%
0.27%
0.00%
---
24.25G
2.652G
0.000
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
3.39%
0.04%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
23.80T
277.9G
95.14G
22.49G
18.32G
2.442G
---
2.74%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
26.46G
306.2M
96.23M
66.11M
96.35M
19.93M
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
X11
MS Windows
AFS
NFS
Port 0
IRC
NTP
RTIP
Telnet
SOCKS
SNMP
IDENT
AOL AIM
RPC Portmapper
---
1.70%
0.26%
0.25%
0.07%
0.04%
0.03%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
11.93T
1.855T
1.755T
514.8G
257.7G
211.5G
170.2G
152.8G
83.70G
58.09G
50.35G
29.33G
18.50G
17.24G
6.031G
5.643G
813.9M
---
2.93%
1.48%
0.30%
0.08%
0.50%
0.06%
0.02%
0.04%
0.05%
0.08%
0.05%
0.04%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
28.33G
14.31G
2.860G
817.6M
4.816G
592.3M
209.8M
348.0M
441.7M
761.6M
461.0M
344.8M
39.46M
143.8M
46.54M
9.173M
5.190M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Shoutcast
Hotline
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Freenet
Carracho
Blubster
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
0.93%
0.29%
0.28%
0.25%
0.06%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.528T
2.019T
1.980T
1.727T
399.3G
109.8G
70.84G
11.14G
4.795G
2.851G
863.1M
819.2M
113.0M
---
0.77%
0.36%
0.26%
0.25%
0.05%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.446G
3.491G
2.473G
2.430G
462.2M
161.6M
98.46M
17.09M
4.550M
4.646M
10.26M
796.3k
137.4k
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.49%
0.34%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.406T
2.357T
205.1G
98.81G
48.63G
11.44G
10.82G
4.148G
136.1M
---
0.33%
0.38%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.201G
3.658G
243.3M
128.5M
115.1M
20.19M
108.7M
9.530M
100.4k
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Spy Arcade
Quake
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
---
0.18%
0.07%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.294T
466.3G
209.1G
160.6G
82.89G
24.37G
16.20G
---
0.22%
0.08%
0.11%
0.02%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.105G
811.0M
1.077G
171.0M
213.6M
46.32M
25.22M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
35.34%
---
247.9T
---
34.12%
---
330.0G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
701.6T
---
100.00%
---
967.3G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.05% 338.7G 0.27% 2.652G
IGMP[2]0.00% 97.26M 0.00% 1.939M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.02% 140.6G 0.02% 150.3M
TCP[6]91.93% 644.9T 88.61% 857.1G
UDP[17]5.56% 39.01T 9.10% 88.07G
IPv6[41]0.04% 296.4G 0.04% 381.1M
GRE[47]1.29% 9.046T 0.90% 8.676G
ESP[50]1.10% 7.713T 1.03% 10.00G
AX.25[93]0.00% 26.40k 0.00% 400.0
PIM[103]0.00% 4.349G 0.01% 53.60M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 74.79G 0.02% 182.9M
Total100.00% 701.6T 100.00% 967.3G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)42.80% 414.0G
Medium (100-1400B)19.89% 192.3G
Large (1401-1500B)37.19% 359.7G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.12% 1.197G
Total100.00% 967.3G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]94.65% 664.0T 95.84% 927.0G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.37% 2.598T 0.16% 1.542G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 39.44G 0.02% 186.9M
Other4.98% 34.91T 3.98% 38.52G
Total100.00% 701.6T 100.00% 967.3G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.86% 6.042T 0.43% 4.191G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19351.95% 13.70T 2.76% 26.73G
9881.57% 11.03T 0.85% 8.208G
21280.90% 6.335T 0.79% 7.619G
10210.79% 5.524T 0.42% 4.074G
10200.78% 5.486T 0.42% 4.050G