Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20090525

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20090525 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 47.80% of octets and 26.18% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.397M 3 10.08M
5 1.503M 11 10.50M
10 1.630M 21 11.12M
50 3.315M 58 18.90M
90 13.53M 59 57.61M
95 21.81M 59 91.05M
99 52.54M 59 218.3M
99.9 384.2M 59 735.1M
99.99 1.004G 59 2.038G
99.999 3.259G 60 6.452G
100 86.40G 62 14.94G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)2.05% 6.265G
Medium (100-1400B)7.88% 24.11G
Large (1401-1500B)89.85% 275.0G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.22% 684.7M
Total100.00% 306.1G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers23.47% 103.4T 23.34% 71.45G 29.18% 3.980M
Encrypted Traffic8.38% 36.93T 9.81% 30.02G 6.03% 822.1k
Advanced Apps3.89% 17.12T 3.89% 11.89G 5.18% 707.1k
Measurement3.87% 17.04T 3.47% 10.61G 0.28% 38.05k
File Sharing2.69% 11.84T 2.65% 8.117G 2.56% 349.4k
Misc0.57% 2.526T 0.59% 1.812G 1.06% 144.2k
Games0.16% 688.1G 0.17% 526.3M 0.25% 34.06k
Audio/Video0.13% 589.5G 0.14% 429.1M 0.28% 38.59k
Unidentified56.85% 250.4T 55.95% 171.2G 55.18% 7.527M
Total100.00% 440.6T 100.00% 306.1G 100.00% 13.64M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
4.762G824411ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
4.109G824420ESnet-East [291]Abilene [11537]Iperf
3.059G900029DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf
2.859G900011Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.045G891610VANDERBILT [7212]Abilene [11537]Iperf
994.1M149210SDSC [195]Abilene [11537]Iperf
993.9M150013Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]VANDERBILT [7212]Iperf
992.2M150013U Chicago [160]Unknown [32361]Iperf
982.4M150015Unknown [32361]U Chicago [160]Iperf
958.9M150020Unknown [32361]Boston U [111]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
7.797G900010Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]51097 -> 3002
967.8M900060ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]Shoutcast
954.9M150020Unknown [25776]ESnet-East [291]5028 -> 5028
712.4M150030Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]UNL [7896]49581 -> 45763
600.2M150020Unknown [25776]ESnet-West [292]BBFTP
535.7M900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]44682 -> 5101
500.1M150060U Kansas [2496]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]1021 -> 988
488.8M150010Unknown [32361]Universiy of California, San Diego CA [7377]34203 -> 47745
475.7M150014Unknown [32440]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]1020 -> 988
472.9M150017UNL [7896]Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]42274 -> 21429

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 1.128k.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers32.11% 296.0T 35.84% 419.0G
Encrypted Traffic7.35% 67.72T 8.14% 95.13G
Advanced Apps3.43% 31.60T 2.80% 32.76G
File Sharing2.17% 20.02T 1.87% 21.83G
Misc2.03% 18.72T 4.84% 56.53G
Measurement2.03% 18.68T 1.36% 15.84G
Audio/Video0.79% 7.310T 0.72% 8.378G
Games0.34% 3.091T 0.60% 6.977G
Unidentified49.75% 458.6T 43.85% 512.6G
Total100.00% 921.7T 100.00% 1.169T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
28.25%
2.94%
0.46%
0.45%
---
260.4T
27.14T
4.238T
4.190T
---
32.87%
1.89%
0.54%
0.53%
---
384.3G
22.11G
6.315G
6.255G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
4.00%
2.80%
0.54%
0.01%
0.00%
---
36.83T
25.84T
4.941T
72.14G
32.95G
---
4.07%
3.44%
0.60%
0.01%
0.01%
---
47.61G
40.16G
7.072G
174.6M
102.2M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
BBCP
McIDAS
BBFTP
GsiFTP
IBP
---
2.76%
0.59%
0.04%
0.04%
0.00%
0.00%
---
25.41T
5.423T
386.6G
349.5G
30.56G
763.6M
---
2.40%
0.34%
0.03%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
---
28.04G
3.951G
379.6M
303.5M
80.01M
6.087M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
Hotline
eDonkey2000
FastTrack
Gnutella
Freenet
WinMX
Carracho
Blubster
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.43%
0.28%
0.25%
0.12%
0.07%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
13.17T
2.576T
2.292T
1.138T
657.0G
74.33G
67.72G
19.87G
17.91G
12.72G
1.721G
511.2M
10.97M
---
1.04%
0.36%
0.25%
0.12%
0.06%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
12.18G
4.234G
2.965G
1.438G
695.0M
98.80M
128.6M
20.95M
28.22M
19.04M
20.09M
760.0k
69.10k
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
Port 0
X11
AFS
MS Windows
NFS
NTP
RTIP
IRC
Telnet
SOCKS
SNMP
AOL AIM
IDENT
RPC Portmapper
---
1.35%
0.21%
0.18%
0.11%
0.06%
0.05%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
12.47T
1.940T
1.657T
1.011T
531.4G
480.5G
231.1G
123.7G
64.27G
61.94G
59.43G
27.61G
24.77G
18.50G
13.17G
4.074G
397.8M
---
2.49%
1.30%
0.24%
0.09%
0.07%
0.08%
0.36%
0.01%
0.07%
0.04%
0.02%
0.02%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
29.16G
15.24G
2.855G
1.044G
826.3M
902.2M
4.175G
140.9M
843.6M
498.7M
291.6M
278.4M
52.40M
154.7M
17.99M
45.35M
4.278M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
1.99%
0.04%
0.00%
---
18.31T
374.5G
35.34M
---
1.10%
0.25%
0.00%
---
12.91G
2.933G
28.80k
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
Backbone Radio
H.323 Signaling
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.42%
0.34%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.826T
3.095T
226.8G
62.53G
58.09G
18.57G
15.83G
5.928G
39.59M
---
0.31%
0.37%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.567G
4.336G
251.2M
83.43M
72.61M
28.97M
25.92M
12.73M
29.20k
Games
DirectX
Half-Life
Battlenet
Spy Arcade
Quake
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
---
0.18%
0.07%
0.05%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.650T
641.3G
459.2G
169.5G
113.9G
34.61G
22.31G
---
0.20%
0.27%
0.08%
0.01%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
2.395G
3.119G
897.1M
173.6M
283.7M
68.97M
38.77M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
49.75%
---
458.6T
---
43.85%
---
512.6G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
921.7T
---
100.00%
---
1.169T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.04% 374.5G 0.25% 2.933G
IGMP[2]0.00% 235.4M 0.00% 3.173M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 14.69G 0.00% 34.04M
TCP[6]90.85% 837.4T 87.38% 1.021T
UDP[17]5.59% 51.49T 9.57% 111.9G
IPv6[41]0.05% 482.3G 0.05% 596.9M
GRE[47]2.93% 26.96T 2.12% 24.76G
ESP[50]0.54% 4.941T 0.60% 7.072G
AX.25[93]0.00% 38.95M 0.00% 33.20k
PIM[103]0.00% 4.668G 0.00% 58.22M
IPMP[169]0.00% 35.34M 0.00% 28.80k
Other0.01% 81.35G 0.02% 182.8M
Total100.00% 921.7T 100.00% 1.169T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)39.02% 456.1G
Medium (100-1400B)18.97% 221.8G
Large (1401-1500B)41.39% 483.9G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.62% 7.259G
Total100.00% 1.169T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.09% 885.7T 96.56% 1.128T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.16% 1.435T 0.13% 1.492G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 49.54G 0.02% 194.4M
Other3.75% 34.52T 3.30% 38.56G
Total100.00% 921.7T 100.00% 1.169T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.62% 5.735T 0.34% 3.954G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19352.22% 20.46T 2.57% 29.99G
200001.34% 12.33T 1.19% 13.86G
200011.11% 10.23T 0.84% 9.809G
200020.94% 8.624T 0.64% 7.499G
200030.83% 7.675T 0.54% 6.344G