Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20090518

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20090518 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 39.27% of octets and 20.21% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.391M 3 10.05M
5 1.478M 10 10.48M
10 1.579M 19 10.95M
50 3.052M 58 17.55M
90 12.87M 59 52.72M
95 21.57M 59 85.05M
99 67.03M 59 225.3M
99.9 466.4M 59 883.9M
99.99 1.014G 59 1.935G
99.999 3.740G 59 6.513G
100 30.40G 62 11.86G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)2.91% 6.806G
Medium (100-1400B)12.29% 28.74G
Large (1401-1500B)84.35% 197.1G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.44% 1.039G
Total100.00% 233.7G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers32.06% 105.7T 31.36% 73.30G 39.76% 4.217M
Encrypted Traffic11.34% 37.41T 13.74% 32.11G 7.87% 835.2k
Measurement5.94% 19.59T 4.74% 11.09G 0.60% 63.63k
Advanced Apps5.29% 17.46T 5.49% 12.82G 6.01% 637.0k
File Sharing1.73% 5.711T 1.70% 3.981G 1.72% 182.6k
Misc0.87% 2.883T 0.89% 2.069G 1.53% 162.2k
Games0.20% 647.2G 0.19% 451.6M 0.29% 31.20k
Audio/Video0.19% 623.9G 0.19% 446.6M 0.39% 41.62k
Unidentified42.39% 139.8T 41.70% 97.48G 41.82% 4.435M
Total100.00% 330.0T 100.00% 233.7G 100.00% 10.60M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
4.788G824420ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
4.245G824420ESnet-East [291]Abilene [11537]Iperf
4.141G900013Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
2.166G900017VANDERBILT [7212]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.017G150012Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]VANDERBILT [7212]Iperf
987.0M149010SDSC [195]Abilene [11537]Iperf
976.4M150011Unknown [32361]U Chicago [160]Iperf
971.8M150011U Chicago [160]Unknown [32361]Iperf
967.6M150030Unknown [32361]U Wisconsin [59]Iperf
942.9M150029Unknown [32361]Boston U [111]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
5.562G900010Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]59901 -> 3002
1.001G900010ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]47140 -> 3002
988.2M900043Abilene [11537]ESNET [3428]Shoutcast
934.5M150020Unknown [25776]ESnet-East [291]5075 -> 5075
865.3M824410UC Santa Cruz [5739]Abilene [11537]52413 -> 3002
628.0M150016Unknown [25776]ESnet-West [292]5024 -> 5024
589.2M150016Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]UNL [7896]52935 -> 39025
557.1M150038NASA-GSFC [1749]BWI-GIGA-POP [10886]FTP
551.9M150026U Chicago [160]MIT [3]42189 -> 48744
543.5M900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]58291 -> 5101

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 877.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers38.08% 320.0T 40.61% 469.8G
Encrypted Traffic8.74% 73.46T 9.14% 105.6G
Advanced Apps3.19% 26.77T 2.56% 29.66G
Measurement2.52% 21.16T 1.44% 16.66G
Misc2.43% 20.40T 5.07% 58.61G
File Sharing1.65% 13.86T 1.54% 17.83G
Audio/Video1.09% 9.142T 0.93% 10.74G
Games0.35% 2.914T 0.55% 6.366G
Unidentified41.96% 352.5T 38.16% 441.5G
Total100.00% 840.3T 100.00% 1.156T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
NNTP
FTP
---
34.57%
2.51%
0.57%
0.44%
---
290.4T
21.06T
4.768T
3.701T
---
37.89%
1.60%
0.62%
0.50%
---
438.3G
18.55G
7.137G
5.780G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
4.41%
3.44%
0.88%
0.01%
0.00%
---
37.04T
28.92T
7.390T
74.79G
31.22G
---
4.37%
3.90%
0.85%
0.02%
0.01%
---
50.54G
45.08G
9.785G
178.2M
97.57M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
IBP
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
---
2.76%
0.35%
0.05%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
23.16T
2.946T
400.0G
209.9G
29.22G
26.63G
---
2.24%
0.25%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
---
25.92G
2.892G
404.5M
267.0M
70.22M
109.8M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
2.47%
0.05%
0.00%
---
20.78T
382.6G
0.000
---
1.18%
0.26%
0.00%
---
13.65G
3.010G
0.000
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
Port 0
X11
AFS
NFS
MS Windows
NTP
RTIP
IRC
Telnet
SOCKS
SNMP
AOL AIM
IDENT
RPC Portmapper
---
1.60%
0.23%
0.20%
0.14%
0.07%
0.06%
0.06%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
13.47T
1.970T
1.658T
1.165T
552.6G
523.7G
515.5G
231.2G
70.63G
68.31G
57.14G
36.66G
25.61G
19.81G
17.76G
15.94G
476.4M
---
2.54%
1.42%
0.24%
0.10%
0.08%
0.08%
0.04%
0.36%
0.08%
0.05%
0.03%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
29.37G
16.39G
2.738G
1.200G
913.4M
915.6M
498.5M
4.118G
895.8M
570.7M
293.7M
401.7M
59.94M
156.1M
21.57M
54.83M
5.871M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
Hotline
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
Freenet
WinMX
Carracho
Blubster
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
0.79%
0.33%
0.27%
0.14%
0.09%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.620T
2.753T
2.293T
1.168T
772.3G
83.13G
79.20G
56.98G
16.83G
12.41G
1.811G
379.9M
12.97M
---
0.65%
0.39%
0.27%
0.13%
0.07%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.470G
4.536G
3.140G
1.471G
811.0M
169.4M
106.6M
59.85M
22.50M
22.12M
22.45M
632.1k
98.10k
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.63%
0.41%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.299T
3.418T
266.6G
59.84G
51.25G
24.06G
20.12G
3.043G
53.42M
---
0.46%
0.42%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.355G
4.856G
317.0M
71.45M
77.01M
34.82M
28.55M
8.166M
39.40k
Games
DirectX
Half-Life
Battlenet
Spy Arcade
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.20%
0.05%
0.05%
0.02%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.662T
457.7G
398.5G
199.0G
140.6G
33.54G
22.27G
---
0.21%
0.21%
0.08%
0.02%
0.03%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.425G
2.405G
912.9M
206.1M
305.4M
55.56M
56.19M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
41.96%
---
352.5T
---
38.16%
---
441.5G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
840.3T
---
100.00%
---
1.156T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.05% 382.6G 0.26% 3.010G
IGMP[2]0.00% 42.63M 0.00% 1.247M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 24.48G 0.00% 49.59M
TCP[6]88.44% 743.1T 85.72% 991.6G
UDP[17]6.59% 55.36T 10.22% 118.2G
IPv6[41]0.06% 529.7G 0.05% 625.9M
GRE[47]3.98% 33.40T 2.88% 33.28G
ESP[50]0.88% 7.390T 0.85% 9.785G
AX.25[93]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
PIM[103]0.00% 4.774G 0.01% 59.19M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 74.83G 0.02% 178.6M
Total100.00% 840.3T 100.00% 1.156T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)41.67% 482.1G
Medium (100-1400B)22.22% 257.0G
Large (1401-1500B)35.49% 410.6G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.61% 7.050G
Total100.00% 1.156T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]94.89% 797.3T 95.49% 1.104T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.21% 1.750T 0.18% 2.137G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 51.78G 0.02% 203.4M
Other4.89% 41.09T 4.31% 49.86G
Total100.00% 840.3T 100.00% 1.156T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.79% 6.614T 0.39% 4.556G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19352.56% 21.51T 2.90% 33.57G
9881.03% 8.642T 0.56% 6.433G
10210.62% 5.180T 0.34% 3.907G
200000.61% 5.112T 0.41% 4.703G
200010.61% 5.090T 0.40% 4.664G