Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20090316

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20090316 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 38.00% of octets and 19.75% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.395M 2 10.05M
5 1.486M 6 10.40M
10 1.595M 13 10.92M
50 3.331M 57 17.40M
90 15.63M 59 52.35M
95 26.03M 59 81.75M
99 78.71M 59 159.9M
99.9 197.9M 59 433.2M
99.99 462.9M 59 1.045G
99.999 990.2M 60 2.707G
100 9.428G 62 39.97G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.79% 2.368G
Medium (100-1400B)9.71% 29.09G
Large (1401-1500B)89.46% 268.1G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.04% 134.6M
Total100.00% 299.7G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers33.59% 145.4T 33.78% 101.2G 40.37% 6.246M
Encrypted Traffic10.23% 44.30T 10.60% 31.75G 7.58% 1.172M
Advanced Apps3.47% 15.02T 3.45% 10.35G 4.19% 647.7k
File Sharing2.54% 11.00T 2.56% 7.665G 2.03% 313.8k
Measurement1.05% 4.566T 1.04% 3.125G 0.19% 30.11k
Misc0.73% 3.173T 0.82% 2.455G 1.16% 180.1k
Games0.24% 1.028T 0.24% 717.3M 0.29% 44.82k
Audio/Video0.23% 1.016T 0.25% 743.7M 0.45% 70.21k
Unidentified47.91% 207.4T 47.27% 141.6G 43.74% 6.767M
Total100.00% 433.0T 100.00% 299.7G 100.00% 15.47M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
8.272G900024Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.022G150012APAN-JP [7660]Abilene [11537]Iperf
980.4M150013U Chicago [160]Unknown [32361]Iperf
979.1M150012U Wisconsin [59]Unknown [32361]Iperf
765.6M150012ESnet-East [291]Unknown [32361]Iperf
744.2M150010Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]Abilene [11537]Iperf
725.0M150010U Florida [6356]Abilene [11537]Iperf
674.3M150010VANDERBILT [7212]Abilene [11537]Iperf
605.5M150015Brookhaven National Lab [43]Unknown [32361]Iperf
449.4M150010SDSC [195]Abilene [11537]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
7.082G900015SDSC [195]Abilene [11537]35362 -> 4900
4.071G900021U Chicago [160]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]HTTPS
1.012G898735Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]5017 -> 5017
889.8M150038Purdue [17]TACCNET [32093]39079 -> 50387
757.7M150010Unknown [25776]Brookhaven National Lab [43]55635 -> 20000
642.8M900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]40673 -> 5101
541.9M900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]58628 -> 5101
531.5M150010Unknown [25776]Abilene [11537]3003 -> 57913
485.1M150011ESnet-East [291]Unknown [32361]49855 -> 3002
483.1M900020TACCNET [32093]ORNL [50]52134 -> 50384

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 1.199k.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers44.43% 506.3T 44.37% 673.4G
Encrypted Traffic7.05% 80.34T 7.35% 111.6G
Misc2.22% 25.25T 3.86% 58.60G
Advanced Apps2.14% 24.41T 1.72% 26.14G
File Sharing1.86% 21.16T 1.70% 25.87G
Audio/Video1.12% 12.73T 0.97% 14.78G
Measurement0.62% 7.023T 0.60% 9.167G
Games0.38% 4.309T 0.61% 9.294G
Unidentified40.19% 457.9T 38.79% 588.7G
Total100.00% 1.139P 100.00% 1.517T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
41.63%
1.61%
0.83%
0.36%
---
474.4T
18.34T
9.506T
4.080T
---
42.05%
1.16%
0.70%
0.46%
---
638.1G
17.55G
10.69G
6.993G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.93%
2.63%
0.48%
0.01%
0.00%
---
44.73T
29.99T
5.490T
93.31G
25.99G
---
3.59%
3.20%
0.54%
0.02%
0.01%
---
54.43G
48.56G
8.213G
259.8M
139.1M
Misc
Mail
Port 0
Squid
DNS
X11
AFS
MS Windows
IRC
NFS
SOCKS
NTP
RTIP
Telnet
AOL AIM
IDENT
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
---
1.27%
0.42%
0.17%
0.17%
0.07%
0.06%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
14.48T
4.788T
1.940T
1.905T
846.3G
631.7G
158.9G
100.2G
94.63G
72.73G
60.76G
53.37G
47.24G
35.61G
17.77G
17.12G
800.1M
---
1.82%
0.27%
0.23%
1.04%
0.09%
0.07%
0.17%
0.03%
0.01%
0.02%
0.05%
0.03%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
---
27.57G
4.105G
3.472G
15.84G
1.323G
1.032G
2.557G
415.4M
170.6M
254.7M
794.3M
452.7M
340.8M
44.19M
72.46M
140.9M
3.220M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
BBFTP
GsiFTP
IBP
---
1.97%
0.12%
0.04%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
22.47T
1.333T
436.4G
96.84G
37.75G
34.60G
---
1.60%
0.07%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
24.30G
1.119G
457.9M
145.3M
84.17M
30.97M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
BitTorrent
Shoutcast
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Freenet
Blubster
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
0.88%
0.35%
0.29%
0.23%
0.07%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.08T
3.940T
3.294T
2.674T
803.1G
190.2G
109.1G
38.04G
14.72G
14.25G
5.350G
1.567G
21.71M
---
0.69%
0.24%
0.33%
0.33%
0.06%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.54G
3.700G
5.008G
4.980G
954.1M
391.5M
143.9M
48.22M
19.10M
17.26M
65.47M
2.532M
91.40k
Audio/Video
Real Player
Any-Source Multicast
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.58%
0.49%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.647T
5.569T
325.6G
73.71G
73.07G
30.73G
11.82G
3.687G
1.313G
---
0.60%
0.33%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.094G
5.040G
378.5M
101.3M
96.78M
46.22M
18.49M
9.805M
968.8k
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.58%
0.04%
0.00%
---
6.577T
446.7G
0.000
---
0.41%
0.19%
0.00%
---
6.281G
2.886G
0.000
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Spy Arcade
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.20%
0.07%
0.05%
0.04%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.315T
762.4G
527.8G
422.1G
181.6G
54.20G
45.52G
---
0.23%
0.10%
0.20%
0.03%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
---
3.503G
1.585G
3.106G
459.7M
474.4M
83.82M
80.41M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
40.19%
---
457.9T
---
38.79%
---
588.7G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
1.139P
---
100.00%
---
1.517T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.04% 446.7G 0.19% 2.886G
IGMP[2]0.00% 45.07M 0.00% 1.269M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 157.3G 0.01% 154.9M
TCP[6]90.47% 1.030P 86.15% 1.307T
UDP[17]7.41% 84.49T 11.44% 173.6G
IPv6[41]0.04% 438.1G 0.04% 657.6M
GRE[47]1.47% 16.80T 1.09% 16.53G
ESP[50]0.48% 5.490T 0.54% 8.213G
AX.25[93]0.00% 13.20k 0.00% 200.0
PIM[103]0.00% 5.602G 0.00% 47.42M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.07% 759.9G 0.53% 8.010G
Total100.00% 1.139P 100.00% 1.517T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)40.38% 612.7G
Medium (100-1400B)20.89% 317.0G
Large (1401-1500B)38.47% 583.8G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.26% 4.015G
Total100.00% 1.517T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.64% 1.101P 96.98% 1.471T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.07% 846.1G 0.10% 1.511G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 120.3G 0.02% 282.8M
Other3.28% 37.36T 2.91% 44.11G
Total100.00% 1.139P 100.00% 1.517T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.23% 2.595T 0.12% 1.879G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19351.95% 22.24T 2.62% 39.78G
330011.23% 13.96T 0.62% 9.381G
200001.05% 11.99T 0.85% 12.93G
164020.49% 5.632T 0.47% 7.084G
21280.48% 5.482T 0.45% 6.859G