Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20090302

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20090302 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 35.33% of octets and 17.73% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.396M 1 10.05M
5 1.490M 8 10.50M
10 1.601M 15 10.95M
50 3.255M 57 17.55M
90 14.19M 59 53.25M
95 25.99M 59 79.41M
99 85.97M 59 180.9M
99.9 200.2M 59 549.1M
99.99 424.5M 117 1.254G
99.999 978.0M 119 2.634G
100 19.68G 122 23.11G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.79% 2.220G
Medium (100-1400B)11.08% 31.12G
Large (1401-1500B)88.10% 247.5G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.02% 69.98M
Total100.00% 280.9G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers35.93% 145.0T 36.02% 101.1G 43.53% 6.099M
Encrypted Traffic12.33% 49.78T 12.80% 35.96G 8.66% 1.213M
Advanced Apps3.10% 12.49T 3.08% 8.666G 4.03% 564.8k
File Sharing2.75% 11.11T 2.72% 7.628G 2.15% 300.9k
Misc0.84% 3.382T 0.91% 2.563G 1.37% 191.8k
Measurement0.79% 3.194T 0.79% 2.208G 0.22% 30.59k
Games0.32% 1.283T 0.32% 891.1M 0.37% 51.92k
Audio/Video0.21% 861.5G 0.22% 629.7M 0.43% 59.60k
Unidentified43.73% 176.5T 43.14% 121.1G 39.25% 5.499M
Total100.00% 403.6T 100.00% 280.9G 100.00% 14.01M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
3.203G864058Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
994.6M150012APAN-JP [7660]Abilene [11537]Iperf
949.0M150015Brookhaven National Lab [43]Abilene [11537]Iperf
613.3M150039Unknown [32361]Unknown [25776]Iperf
582.3M150015Brookhaven National Lab [43]Unknown [32361]Iperf
278.8M149530S Methodist U [1832]Unknown [32361]Iperf
266.4M149738Unknown [32361]S Methodist U [1832]Iperf
200.3M150014NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]Israeli Academic and Research Network [378]Iperf
188.5M149336S Methodist U [1832]Brookhaven National Lab [43]Iperf
184.8M150018Unknown [32361]SWITCH [559]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
971.0M150010FAUNET [12013]Abilene [11537]38061 -> 3002
782.6M150010Georgia Institute of Technology [2637]Abilene [11537]33623 -> 3002
685.6M150010VANDERBILT [7212]Abilene [11537]48610 -> 3002
588.9M150050Unknown [32440]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]1021 -> 988
575.6M149814U Kansas [2496]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]1020 -> 988
553.6M150018INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Unknown [32440]988 -> 1022
544.7M898810High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]38956 -> 5101
484.9M150010U Texas, Arlington [18515]Abilene [11537]3003 -> 50002
456.4M149910U Florida [6356]Abilene [11537]52425 -> 3002
431.4M150012Abilene [11537]Merit [237]Rsync

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 1.111k.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers45.08% 515.0T 45.57% 722.2G
Encrypted Traffic7.92% 90.43T 7.74% 122.6G
Misc1.99% 22.69T 3.95% 62.57G
File Sharing1.95% 22.30T 1.72% 27.26G
Advanced Apps1.87% 21.34T 1.48% 23.46G
Audio/Video1.03% 11.82T 0.83% 13.22G
Measurement0.46% 5.243T 0.48% 7.680G
Games0.41% 4.657T 0.70% 11.15G
Unidentified39.29% 448.8T 37.51% 594.5G
Total100.00% 1.142P 100.00% 1.584T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
42.02%
1.33%
1.21%
0.52%
---
480.0T
15.20T
13.87T
5.927T
---
43.21%
0.97%
0.88%
0.51%
---
684.7G
15.43G
13.95G
8.092G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
4.42%
2.94%
0.54%
0.01%
0.00%
---
50.44T
33.64T
6.184T
118.9G
39.29G
---
3.65%
3.47%
0.56%
0.02%
0.04%
---
57.82G
55.03G
8.858G
276.3M
688.9M
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
X11
AFS
Port 0
MS Windows
IRC
NFS
NTP
RTIP
Telnet
SOCKS
AOL AIM
SNMP
IDENT
RPC Portmapper
---
1.34%
0.20%
0.19%
0.10%
0.05%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
15.33T
2.255T
2.189T
1.197T
594.0G
452.5G
216.2G
122.9G
72.94G
65.05G
58.46G
46.54G
29.57G
28.07G
17.25G
13.22G
1.063G
---
1.84%
1.23%
0.24%
0.10%
0.07%
0.07%
0.22%
0.03%
0.01%
0.05%
0.03%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
29.17G
19.44G
3.788G
1.623G
1.073G
1.076G
3.510G
499.3M
152.6M
848.7M
529.3M
530.4M
89.50M
44.62M
141.8M
50.22M
2.542M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
BitTorrent
Shoutcast
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Freenet
Blubster
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
0.86%
0.36%
0.35%
0.27%
0.07%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.847T
4.121T
4.017T
3.036T
805.4G
228.7G
162.6G
47.06G
12.49G
9.519G
8.514G
1.903G
71.84M
---
0.64%
0.24%
0.37%
0.35%
0.06%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.18G
3.844G
5.841G
5.520G
972.8M
485.1M
207.9M
73.28M
18.07M
10.48M
103.1M
2.157M
112.2k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
IBP
BBFTP
GsiFTP
---
1.71%
0.11%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
19.58T
1.205T
220.4G
198.5G
78.34G
54.40G
---
1.37%
0.06%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
---
21.78G
1.010G
235.5M
202.5M
109.4M
126.1M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.52%
0.46%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.991T
5.302T
308.8G
98.69G
73.59G
24.68G
17.31G
6.905G
196.0M
---
0.34%
0.45%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.325G
7.205G
381.5M
125.6M
105.1M
39.04M
28.06M
16.17M
144.6k
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.43%
0.03%
0.00%
---
4.934T
309.5G
0.000
---
0.33%
0.16%
0.00%
---
5.166G
2.513G
0.000
Games
DirectX
Spy Arcade
Half-Life
Battlenet
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.22%
0.06%
0.06%
0.05%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
2.508T
640.8G
637.3G
535.6G
218.0G
70.80G
46.38G
---
0.25%
0.04%
0.26%
0.10%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
---
3.903G
664.7M
4.146G
1.626G
601.6M
121.1M
88.99M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
39.29%
---
448.8T
---
37.51%
---
594.5G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
1.142P
---
100.00%
---
1.584T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.03% 309.5G 0.16% 2.513G
IGMP[2]0.00% 42.88M 0.00% 1.251M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 109.8G 0.01% 100.1M
TCP[6]88.72% 1.013P 84.98% 1.346T
UDP[17]8.73% 99.77T 12.82% 203.1G
IPv6[41]0.04% 449.9G 0.05% 754.9M
GRE[47]1.92% 21.91T 1.41% 22.41G
ESP[50]0.54% 6.184T 0.56% 8.858G
AX.25[93]0.00% 26.40k 0.00% 400.0
PIM[103]0.00% 5.130G 0.00% 46.16M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 119.8G 0.02% 286.9M
Total100.00% 1.142P 100.00% 1.584T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)40.99% 649.6G
Medium (100-1400B)22.93% 363.4G
Large (1401-1500B)35.65% 565.0G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.42% 6.724G
Total100.00% 1.584T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]95.27% 1.088P 96.02% 1.521T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.15% 1.740T 0.18% 2.905G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 69.82G 0.02% 296.3M
Other4.57% 52.21T 3.78% 59.89G
Total100.00% 1.142P 100.00% 1.584T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.15% 1.677T 0.08% 1.299G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
330013.07% 35.02T 1.49% 23.54G
19351.48% 16.91T 2.34% 37.15G
164020.94% 10.69T 0.86% 13.57G
30740.59% 6.689T 1.83% 29.04G
9880.58% 6.611T 0.31% 4.951G