Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20090105

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20090105 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 41.87% of octets and 21.80% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.395M 1 10.06M
5 1.496M 7 10.50M
10 1.622M 14 11.04M
50 3.529M 57 18.41M
90 15.68M 59 56.51M
95 28.96M 59 81.90M
99 87.34M 59 168.4M
99.9 223.1M 59 480.6M
99.99 862.5M 59 2.851G
99.999 1.303G 118 5.685G
100 93.60G 121 7.536G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.71% 1.778G
Medium (100-1400B)10.26% 25.57G
Large (1401-1500B)88.57% 220.8G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.46% 1.134G
Total100.00% 249.3G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers34.60% 127.2T 35.50% 88.51G 42.48% 5.185M
Encrypted Traffic7.42% 27.28T 7.76% 19.34G 7.03% 858.7k
Measurement3.53% 12.99T 1.57% 3.916G 0.34% 41.40k
Advanced Apps3.40% 12.52T 3.48% 8.681G 4.72% 576.7k
File Sharing3.14% 11.56T 3.18% 7.927G 2.24% 273.3k
Misc0.71% 2.597T 0.79% 1.960G 1.09% 132.8k
Games0.29% 1.050T 0.31% 769.9M 0.33% 39.85k
Audio/Video0.12% 442.1G 0.13% 327.9M 0.25% 30.88k
Unidentified46.79% 172.0T 47.28% 117.8G 41.52% 5.068M
Total100.00% 367.7T 100.00% 249.3G 100.00% 12.20M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
2.078G900012DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf
1.056G824416ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.033G900013ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]Iperf
729.8M150011U Chicago [160]Unknown [32361]Iperf
683.9M900060PSC-NCNE [5050]TACCNET [32093]Iperf
631.9M150032Brookhaven National Lab [43]Unknown [32361]Iperf
403.3M150017GEORGE-MASON-UNIV [11279]U Chicago [160]Iperf
400.1M150010U Chicago [160]ESnet-East [291]Iperf
272.1M150018U Chicago [160]Brookhaven National Lab [43]Iperf
216.8M150012NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]Israeli Academic and Research Network [378]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
975.4M150013Boston U [111]Brookhaven National Lab [43]32779 -> 20000
931.8M150010FAUNET [12013]Abilene [11537]52955 -> 3002
795.5M150026Boston U [111]Unknown [32361]32780 -> 10000
581.7M150012INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]63002 -> 45040
559.8M150024Nat Lib Med [70]Cornell [26]50067 -> 38821
502.2M900037INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]ORNL [50]Audiogalaxy
456.0M150014Unknown [25776]LATECH [19564]63003 -> 50002
440.7M144014MIT [3]Unknown [0]HTTP
393.5M150017Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Unknown [0]Rsync
368.6M150013NOAA [6629]NIST-BOULDER [2648]FTP

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 955.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers44.21% 388.3T 43.81% 501.1G
Encrypted Traffic6.74% 59.16T 7.27% 83.15G
Advanced Apps2.45% 21.47T 2.14% 24.53G
File Sharing2.26% 19.88T 2.10% 24.00G
Misc2.23% 19.61T 4.41% 50.48G
Measurement1.71% 15.06T 0.83% 9.510G
Audio/Video1.24% 10.91T 1.08% 12.38G
Games0.38% 3.349T 0.56% 6.436G
Unidentified38.78% 340.6T 37.79% 432.3G
Total100.00% 878.3T 100.00% 1.143T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
FTP
Rsync
NNTP
---
40.77%
1.53%
1.26%
0.64%
---
358.1T
13.43T
11.10T
5.607T
---
41.14%
1.10%
1.00%
0.57%
---
470.6G
12.58G
11.40G
6.527G
Encrypted Traffic
HTTPS
SSH
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.03%
2.88%
0.82%
0.01%
0.00%
---
26.58T
25.26T
7.198T
106.3G
9.027G
---
3.71%
2.74%
0.80%
0.02%
0.00%
---
42.40G
31.35G
9.125G
221.8M
41.36M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
2.25%
0.16%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
19.77T
1.433T
191.3G
40.11G
27.69G
8.217G
---
2.00%
0.11%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
22.84G
1.212G
254.7M
89.64M
98.17M
31.86M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
BitTorrent
Shoutcast
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Freenet
Carracho
Blubster
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
0.98%
0.55%
0.31%
0.30%
0.09%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.643T
4.860T
2.720T
2.593T
790.6G
123.2G
89.93G
25.67G
19.73G
9.241G
5.211G
249.3M
135.2M
---
0.75%
0.39%
0.40%
0.43%
0.08%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.525G
4.489G
4.560G
4.953G
937.7M
277.9M
121.6M
40.90M
19.72M
15.30M
58.83M
453.0k
318.6k
Misc
Mail
Port 0
Squid
DNS
X11
AFS
MS Windows
IRC
RTIP
NTP
Telnet
NFS
AOL AIM
SOCKS
SNMP
IDENT
RPC Portmapper
---
1.34%
0.29%
0.26%
0.18%
0.05%
0.05%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
11.79T
2.515T
2.302T
1.578T
464.5G
402.5G
160.4G
95.44G
73.44G
64.39G
57.75G
47.77G
18.27G
18.02G
16.03G
7.719G
391.9M
---
2.15%
0.29%
0.28%
1.08%
0.08%
0.07%
0.22%
0.04%
0.06%
0.07%
0.05%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
24.61G
3.358G
3.192G
12.30G
864.9M
837.4M
2.465G
490.3M
676.0M
838.2M
537.3M
75.33M
22.73M
33.48M
131.8M
41.83M
4.517M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
1.68%
0.04%
0.00%
---
14.73T
321.7G
4.848M
---
0.60%
0.23%
0.00%
---
6.911G
2.598G
3.600k
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.81%
0.40%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.109T
3.510T
162.9G
65.77G
34.66G
15.69G
11.21G
6.321G
0.000
---
0.55%
0.49%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.305G
5.657G
221.8M
85.59M
51.57M
26.00M
18.96M
14.58M
0.000
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Spy Arcade
Half-Life
Quake
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
---
0.22%
0.06%
0.05%
0.03%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.904T
528.9G
430.8G
293.8G
139.3G
34.88G
17.52G
---
0.24%
0.09%
0.04%
0.16%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.797G
1.033G
447.8M
1.786G
285.2M
56.59M
29.14M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
38.78%
---
340.6T
---
37.79%
---
432.3G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
878.3T
---
100.00%
---
1.143T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.04% 321.7G 0.23% 2.598G
IGMP[2]0.00% 41.70M 0.00% 1.216M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 91.95G 0.01% 85.73M
TCP[6]91.28% 801.7T 86.29% 987.1G
UDP[17]6.93% 60.84T 11.93% 136.4G
IPv6[41]0.05% 478.0G 0.05% 561.7M
GRE[47]0.86% 7.568T 0.68% 7.755G
ESP[50]0.82% 7.198T 0.80% 9.125G
AX.25[93]0.00% 6.501M 0.00% 5.200k
PIM[103]0.00% 4.343G 0.00% 37.46M
IPMP[169]0.00% 4.848M 0.00% 3.600k
Other0.01% 108.2G 0.02% 224.8M
Total100.00% 878.3T 100.00% 1.143T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)40.03% 457.9G
Medium (100-1400B)20.92% 239.3G
Large (1401-1500B)38.88% 444.7G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.17% 1.888G
Total100.00% 1.143T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.80% 850.2T 96.83% 1.107T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.14% 1.198T 0.15% 1.762G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 50.54G 0.02% 179.8M
Other3.06% 26.87T 3.00% 34.34G
Total100.00% 878.3T 100.00% 1.143T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.30% 2.648T 0.17% 1.966G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19351.16% 10.19T 1.70% 19.50G
600110.82% 7.162T 0.71% 8.172G
21280.56% 4.879T 0.54% 6.133G
150000.47% 4.149T 0.49% 5.588G
45000.42% 3.725T 0.43% 4.974G