Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20081229

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20081229 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 45.28% of octets and 24.41% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.392M 1 10.06M
5 1.491M 6 10.50M
10 1.610M 13 11.05M
50 3.513M 58 18.00M
90 17.08M 59 53.67M
95 30.30M 59 77.85M
99 90.13M 59 171.7M
99.9 243.1M 59 508.3M
99.99 978.4M 59 3.445G
99.999 1.405G 119 6.446G
100 46.80G 121 7.461G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.65% 1.144G
Medium (100-1400B)9.80% 17.16G
Large (1401-1500B)88.90% 155.6G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.65% 1.129G
Total100.00% 175.0G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers33.50% 87.46T 34.60% 60.56G 41.02% 3.568M
Encrypted Traffic8.50% 22.19T 8.83% 15.45G 7.58% 659.5k
Measurement5.35% 13.96T 2.81% 4.914G 0.83% 71.98k
Advanced Apps4.66% 12.17T 4.80% 8.406G 6.57% 571.6k
File Sharing3.58% 9.351T 3.66% 6.412G 2.37% 205.9k
Misc0.64% 1.666T 0.76% 1.327G 0.99% 85.74k
Games0.23% 607.8G 0.25% 430.1M 0.27% 23.76k
Audio/Video0.12% 310.9G 0.13% 231.7M 0.25% 21.56k
Unidentified43.43% 113.4T 44.16% 77.30G 40.13% 3.492M
Total100.00% 261.1T 100.00% 175.0G 100.00% 8.701M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.053G824415ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.023G900014ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]Iperf
759.7M150012U Chicago [160]Unknown [32361]Iperf
681.8M150037Brookhaven National Lab [43]Unknown [32361]Iperf
529.3M150013U Chicago [160]Brookhaven National Lab [43]Iperf
396.6M150012U Chicago [160]ESnet-East [291]Iperf
384.7M150014GEORGE-MASON-UNIV [11279]U Chicago [160]Iperf
209.9M150020NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
203.0M150014NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]Israeli Academic and Research Network [378]Iperf
180.1M138911NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.019G900012INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]ORNL [50]48666 -> 5150
608.6M900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]38565 -> 5101
497.4M150014Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Unknown [0]Rsync
454.2M150036Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Indiana [87]Rsync
410.0M150060Nat Lib Med [70]Cornell [26]50166 -> 59305
402.5M150026JPL [127]Oregon State U [4201]Hotline
371.6M150017NASA GSFC [1701]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline
318.8M150060Nat Lib Med [70]NCREN [81]50344 -> 45707
317.5M150019NOAA [6629]NIST-BOULDER [2648]FTP
269.4M150020Nat Lib Med [70]Unknown [26934]FTP

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 679.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers39.37% 227.0T 38.17% 273.6G
Encrypted Traffic7.17% 41.33T 8.00% 57.36G
Advanced Apps3.60% 20.76T 3.29% 23.60G
Measurement2.72% 15.69T 1.35% 9.668G
File Sharing2.56% 14.78T 2.31% 16.53G
Misc2.09% 12.06T 5.12% 36.71G
Audio/Video1.34% 7.701T 1.16% 8.330G
Games0.31% 1.810T 0.47% 3.345G
Unidentified40.83% 235.4T 40.14% 287.7G
Total100.00% 576.7T 100.00% 717.0G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
34.32%
2.18%
1.96%
0.91%
---
197.9T
12.59T
11.28T
5.274T
---
34.14%
1.69%
1.51%
0.83%
---
244.8G
12.09G
10.84G
5.941G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.78%
2.71%
0.66%
0.02%
0.00%
---
21.79T
15.63T
3.790T
107.8G
6.851G
---
4.04%
3.22%
0.71%
0.03%
0.00%
---
28.95G
23.05G
5.108G
214.7M
32.65M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
BBFTP
GsiFTP
IBP
---
3.28%
0.24%
0.05%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
---
18.91T
1.394T
265.6G
152.0G
29.98G
7.040G
---
3.05%
0.16%
0.03%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
---
21.86G
1.181G
234.7M
203.8M
70.64M
45.67M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
2.67%
0.05%
0.00%
---
15.38T
302.1G
0.000
---
1.02%
0.33%
0.00%
---
7.327G
2.340G
0.000
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Freenet
Blubster
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.03%
0.86%
0.27%
0.26%
0.11%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.938T
4.978T
1.573T
1.505T
636.0G
68.41G
58.79G
20.67G
5.668G
1.937G
1.657G
43.04M
7.420M
---
0.82%
0.64%
0.39%
0.32%
0.10%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.846G
4.581G
2.796G
2.309G
746.4M
133.0M
69.00M
29.22M
9.205M
2.096M
16.67M
144.0k
55.50k
Misc
Mail
DNS
Port 0
Squid
AFS
X11
MS Windows
NTP
RTIP
IRC
Telnet
NFS
SOCKS
SNMP
IDENT
AOL AIM
RPC Portmapper
---
1.34%
0.23%
0.22%
0.13%
0.07%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.704T
1.331T
1.262T
731.0G
384.0G
200.7G
113.2G
70.20G
62.50G
58.21G
53.80G
34.33G
16.79G
16.27G
12.21G
10.48G
556.2M
---
2.55%
1.44%
0.19%
0.17%
0.08%
0.07%
0.25%
0.13%
0.08%
0.04%
0.07%
0.01%
0.00%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
18.26G
10.34G
1.377G
1.247G
597.0M
483.2M
1.775G
911.4M
592.0M
296.6M
533.3M
53.37M
28.79M
135.3M
48.10M
16.96M
5.841M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.98%
0.32%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.661T
1.825T
128.5G
35.95G
20.98G
16.47G
8.943G
3.611G
0.000
---
0.72%
0.40%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.171G
2.872G
168.1M
43.37M
28.70M
25.49M
13.11M
7.263M
0.000
Games
DirectX
Half-Life
Battlenet
Spy Arcade
Quake
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
---
0.21%
0.04%
0.03%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.184T
206.8G
156.5G
155.4G
82.11G
15.78G
9.357G
---
0.23%
0.14%
0.05%
0.02%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.617G
1.009G
381.8M
160.0M
129.8M
27.47M
19.14M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
40.83%
---
235.4T
---
40.14%
---
287.7G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
576.7T
---
100.00%
---
717.0G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.05% 302.1G 0.33% 2.340G
IGMP[2]0.00% 42.23M 0.00% 1.228M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 898.9M 0.00% 3.895M
TCP[6]90.44% 521.6T 85.41% 612.4G
UDP[17]7.73% 44.59T 12.61% 90.44G
IPv6[41]0.05% 265.7G 0.05% 339.6M
GRE[47]1.05% 6.041T 0.85% 6.098G
ESP[50]0.66% 3.790T 0.71% 5.108G
AX.25[93]0.00% 19.80k 0.00% 300.0
PIM[103]0.00% 4.000G 0.00% 33.06M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.02% 108.5G 0.03% 216.2M
Total100.00% 576.7T 100.00% 717.0G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)38.27% 274.4G
Medium (100-1400B)20.69% 148.3G
Large (1401-1500B)40.71% 291.8G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.33% 2.371G
Total100.00% 717.0G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.68% 557.5T 96.81% 694.1G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.11% 639.2G 0.13% 926.8M
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 27.49G 0.01% 79.85M
Other3.20% 18.46T 3.05% 21.89G
Total100.00% 576.7T 100.00% 717.0G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.44% 2.524T 0.26% 1.845G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
600111.30% 7.501T 1.19% 8.537G
21280.99% 5.724T 0.98% 7.029G
19350.80% 4.637T 1.17% 8.372G
200000.64% 3.684T 0.54% 3.895G
150000.62% 3.575T 0.72% 5.171G