Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20081208

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20081208 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 33.01% of octets and 16.49% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.394M 1 10.05M
5 1.489M 8 10.48M
10 1.603M 16 10.95M
50 3.189M 57 17.12M
90 12.88M 59 48.99M
95 23.63M 59 69.30M
99 79.72M 59 149.8M
99.9 204.0M 59 463.2M
99.99 890.1M 119 2.893G
99.999 2.100G 144 6.248G
100 46.16G 145 9.808G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)1.55% 3.725G
Medium (100-1400B)10.39% 24.90G
Large (1401-1500B)87.57% 209.9G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.49% 1.163G
Total100.00% 239.7G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers36.56% 128.2T 37.06% 88.84G 43.79% 5.648M
Encrypted Traffic7.26% 25.47T 7.63% 18.30G 5.53% 713.8k
Advanced Apps3.83% 13.42T 3.83% 9.173G 4.63% 597.7k
Measurement3.58% 12.55T 1.61% 3.851G 0.32% 41.89k
File Sharing2.85% 9.980T 2.85% 6.839G 2.01% 259.4k
Misc0.71% 2.496T 0.76% 1.831G 1.04% 133.9k
Games0.31% 1.088T 0.32% 771.2M 0.33% 42.95k
Audio/Video0.15% 521.9G 0.15% 370.5M 0.29% 36.86k
Unidentified44.75% 156.9T 45.78% 109.7G 42.04% 5.422M
Total100.00% 350.7T 100.00% 239.7G 100.00% 12.89M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
4.537G150010SDSC [195]Abilene [11537]Iperf
4.491G900011DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf
1.063G824415ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.020G900030ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]Iperf
958.3M150033U Chicago [160]Unknown [32361]Iperf
711.3M149328APAN-JP [7660]Abilene [11537]Iperf
644.1M150016Brookhaven National Lab [43]Unknown [32361]Iperf
400.1M150024GEORGE-MASON-UNIV [11279]U Chicago [160]Iperf
280.9M900025NASA-AERONET [10343]NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Iperf
258.8M150056GEORGE-MASON-UNIV [11279]Unknown [0]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.054G900023INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]NCSA [1224]49631 -> 5150
1.018G900010INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]ORNL [50]46752 -> 5150
976.6M150033Purdue [17]NCSA [1224]43117 -> 50003
961.6M900026Argonne [683]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]58032 -> 5150
749.7M150010FAUNET [12013]Abilene [11537]42098 -> 3002
636.3M150010UCLA [52]Abilene [11537]2270 -> 3002
581.9M150031Purdue [17]TACCNET [32093]44310 -> 50394
442.2M150047Purdue [17]PSC [1207]55314 -> 50011
440.4M150011Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Unknown [0]Rsync
409.3M150020Purdue [17]ORNL [50]45518 -> 5150

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 1.018k.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers48.69% 517.2T 48.59% 706.4G
Encrypted Traffic5.29% 56.23T 5.76% 83.72G
Advanced Apps2.05% 21.82T 1.72% 24.94G
Misc1.92% 20.35T 3.50% 50.95G
File Sharing1.84% 19.51T 1.73% 25.18G
Measurement1.41% 15.00T 0.73% 10.54G
Audio/Video1.04% 11.03T 0.88% 12.73G
Games0.40% 4.208T 0.69% 9.988G
Unidentified37.36% 396.8T 36.41% 529.4G
Total100.00% 1.062P 100.00% 1.453T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
45.77%
1.19%
1.13%
0.60%
---
486.2T
12.66T
11.98T
6.394T
---
46.26%
0.90%
0.80%
0.63%
---
672.6G
13.09G
11.63G
9.144G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.60%
2.19%
0.49%
0.01%
0.00%
---
27.67T
23.30T
5.172T
75.21G
9.053G
---
2.38%
2.87%
0.49%
0.01%
0.00%
---
34.62G
41.74G
7.122G
193.0M
40.87M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
1.80%
0.13%
0.12%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
19.07T
1.409T
1.290T
31.64G
19.44G
5.211G
---
1.55%
0.08%
0.07%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
---
22.55G
1.209G
975.8M
65.75M
119.2M
23.58M
Misc
Mail
Squid
Port 0
DNS
AFS
X11
IRC
MS Windows
RTIP
NTP
NFS
Telnet
SOCKS
AOL AIM
IDENT
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
---
1.17%
0.25%
0.18%
0.16%
0.06%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
12.44T
2.629T
1.898T
1.733T
655.5G
426.3G
98.72G
98.11G
78.26G
70.71G
68.58G
62.29G
35.33G
22.58G
17.61G
17.03G
442.5M
---
1.75%
0.22%
0.16%
0.93%
0.08%
0.06%
0.04%
0.09%
0.05%
0.06%
0.01%
0.04%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
---
25.51G
3.128G
2.284G
13.48G
1.187G
898.4M
527.2M
1.239G
795.3M
909.3M
128.2M
508.9M
108.6M
34.89M
56.76M
145.5M
4.905M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
BitTorrent
Shoutcast
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Freenet
Carracho
Blubster
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
0.73%
0.43%
0.33%
0.24%
0.07%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.764T
4.564T
3.479T
2.590T
701.4G
209.2G
103.9G
66.38G
15.88G
10.55G
9.311G
1.132G
318.8M
---
0.57%
0.29%
0.39%
0.37%
0.06%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.263G
4.150G
5.605G
5.440G
852.8M
501.7M
143.0M
75.45M
17.25M
20.93M
113.6M
2.034M
612.2k
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
1.37%
0.04%
0.00%
---
14.57T
428.7G
0.000
---
0.50%
0.23%
0.00%
---
7.226G
3.319G
0.000
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.64%
0.35%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.775T
3.747T
300.2G
109.1G
54.95G
26.79G
14.51G
9.439G
144.1M
---
0.36%
0.47%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.238G
6.808G
384.7M
138.7M
77.12M
40.20M
23.35M
24.96M
106.3k
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Spy Arcade
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.23%
0.05%
0.05%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
2.443T
582.5G
558.6G
363.0G
167.7G
57.55G
34.57G
---
0.26%
0.11%
0.25%
0.03%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
---
3.784G
1.563G
3.676G
409.4M
381.6M
99.94M
72.35M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
37.36%
---
396.8T
---
36.41%
---
529.4G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
1.062P
---
100.00%
---
1.453T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.04% 428.7G 0.23% 3.319G
IGMP[2]0.00% 40.24M 0.00% 1.173M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 89.70G 0.01% 91.10M
TCP[6]89.66% 952.5T 85.78% 1.247T
UDP[17]7.85% 83.36T 12.07% 175.5G
IPv6[41]0.02% 254.9G 0.03% 419.2M
GRE[47]1.92% 20.41T 1.38% 20.06G
ESP[50]0.49% 5.172T 0.49% 7.122G
AX.25[93]0.00% 19.80k 0.00% 300.0
PIM[103]0.00% 6.042G 0.00% 39.97M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 75.43G 0.01% 195.3M
Total100.00% 1.062P 100.00% 1.453T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)41.70% 606.3G
Medium (100-1400B)21.67% 315.0G
Large (1401-1500B)36.06% 524.2G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.57% 8.291G
Total100.00% 1.453T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]97.21% 1.032P 97.05% 1.411T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.19% 1.992T 0.21% 3.004G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 44.31G 0.01% 185.6M
Other2.60% 27.60T 2.73% 39.71G
Total100.00% 1.062P 100.00% 1.453T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.25% 2.692T 0.14% 2.073G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19351.84% 19.52T 2.51% 36.55G
164021.38% 14.66T 1.25% 18.17G
600110.97% 10.32T 0.75% 10.91G
150000.43% 4.573T 0.43% 6.233G
30740.41% 4.335T 1.32% 19.21G