Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20081110

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20081110 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 32.91% of octets and 16.35% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.396M 1 10.05M
5 1.494M 6 10.47M
10 1.614M 12 10.95M
50 3.345M 57 17.30M
90 17.34M 59 51.60M
95 35.63M 59 72.60M
99 92.45M 59 153.6M
99.9 213.0M 59 533.7M
99.99 915.0M 86 1.470G
99.999 1.947G 133 6.149G
100 13.09G 141 10.18G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)1.47% 3.571G
Medium (100-1400B)10.74% 26.02G
Large (1401-1500B)87.53% 212.1G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.26% 630.8M
Total100.00% 242.3G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers32.62% 114.1T 33.17% 80.39G 40.18% 5.051M
Encrypted Traffic10.73% 37.53T 11.67% 28.28G 6.76% 850.2k
Advanced Apps4.20% 14.70T 4.19% 10.16G 5.13% 644.2k
File Sharing3.13% 10.93T 3.10% 7.524G 2.33% 292.8k
Measurement1.87% 6.525T 0.98% 2.371G 0.24% 30.75k
Misc0.48% 1.684T 0.50% 1.204G 0.81% 102.1k
Games0.30% 1.047T 0.30% 733.4M 0.35% 44.13k
Audio/Video0.15% 535.0G 0.16% 380.5M 0.31% 38.53k
Unidentified46.52% 162.7T 45.92% 111.3G 43.88% 5.516M
Total100.00% 349.8T 100.00% 242.3G 100.00% 12.57M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
2.934G900012DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf
1.029G900016SCXY [14031]Abilene [11537]Iperf
927.2M900010NYSERNet [3756]Abilene [11537]Iperf
525.8M150011Brookhaven National Lab [43]Unknown [32361]Iperf
445.4M150014U Chicago [160]Unknown [32361]Iperf
406.5M150023GEORGE-MASON-UNIV [11279]U Chicago [160]Iperf
390.1M900021INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]Iperf
329.6M140314CERN [513]Unknown [32361]Iperf
205.8M150011Brookhaven National Lab [43]Abilene [11537]Iperf
178.8M139418NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.059G900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]38889 -> 5101
1.021G900023INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]ORNL [50]35720 -> 5150
953.8M150018ESnet-East [291]Boston U [111]40410 -> 10000
683.5M150010USC-OBERON [47]Abilene [11537]55086 -> 3002
626.3M900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]35956 -> 5101
538.1M150011Unknown [25776]Abilene [11537]3003 -> 43270
524.0M150014INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]63002 -> 57251
474.0M144011MIT [3]Unknown [0]HTTP
466.2M150011Nat Lib Med [70]Columbia [14]50299 -> 52281
440.8M150010FAUNET [12013]Abilene [11537]37781 -> 3002

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 960.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers45.94% 488.3T 46.39% 687.7G
Encrypted Traffic6.53% 69.44T 6.32% 93.70G
File Sharing2.69% 28.57T 2.66% 39.44G
Advanced Apps2.29% 24.32T 1.80% 26.71G
Misc1.79% 19.02T 3.38% 50.11G
Audio/Video1.38% 14.67T 1.10% 16.28G
Measurement0.83% 8.854T 0.55% 8.120G
Games0.39% 4.108T 0.65% 9.689G
Unidentified38.17% 405.7T 37.14% 550.6G
Total100.00% 1.063P 100.00% 1.482T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
43.39%
1.16%
0.84%
0.55%
---
461.2T
12.34T
8.892T
5.869T
---
44.26%
0.87%
0.69%
0.58%
---
656.2G
12.82G
10.17G
8.556G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.88%
2.03%
0.56%
0.06%
0.00%
---
41.28T
21.55T
5.917T
684.0G
9.541G
---
3.14%
2.64%
0.50%
0.04%
0.00%
---
46.58G
39.09G
7.367G
619.1M
40.99M
File Sharing
Shoutcast
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Freenet
Blubster
Carracho
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
0.91%
0.86%
0.40%
0.38%
0.09%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.720T
9.121T
4.268T
4.048T
932.6G
306.6G
98.06G
37.69G
14.15G
12.80G
10.33G
1.015G
590.9M
---
1.21%
0.63%
0.26%
0.41%
0.07%
0.04%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
17.97G
9.324G
3.891G
6.132G
1.105G
634.0M
145.4M
48.72M
17.00M
152.7M
16.48M
1.696M
489.5k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
IBP
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
---
1.80%
0.34%
0.13%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
19.15T
3.583T
1.417T
102.9G
49.87G
16.64G
---
1.49%
0.21%
0.08%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
---
22.11G
3.054G
1.205G
109.9M
113.5M
114.4M
Misc
Mail
Port 0
DNS
Squid
AFS
X11
Telnet
IRC
NFS
NTP
RTIP
MS Windows
IDENT
AOL AIM
SOCKS
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
---
1.13%
0.19%
0.17%
0.16%
0.05%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
12.01T
1.990T
1.761T
1.734T
492.5G
452.3G
99.25G
88.04G
87.22G
72.12G
64.93G
50.62G
37.67G
31.31G
29.03G
16.39G
1.084G
---
1.71%
0.17%
0.91%
0.22%
0.08%
0.07%
0.04%
0.03%
0.01%
0.06%
0.04%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
---
25.31G
2.453G
13.51G
3.219G
1.199G
999.2M
612.9M
449.5M
121.1M
942.2M
549.9M
376.7M
88.81M
45.36M
63.52M
137.2M
19.28M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.99%
0.36%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.50T
3.800T
171.4G
92.72G
62.41G
21.88G
18.36G
8.715G
99.25M
---
0.60%
0.45%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.965G
6.744G
248.9M
120.4M
118.6M
31.22M
31.12M
21.24M
73.20k
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.80%
0.03%
0.00%
---
8.503T
351.3G
0.000
---
0.38%
0.17%
0.00%
---
5.624G
2.496G
0.000
Games
DirectX
Half-Life
Battlenet
Spy Arcade
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.23%
0.04%
0.04%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
2.487T
467.7G
423.8G
413.0G
191.5G
89.78G
35.44G
---
0.26%
0.23%
0.09%
0.03%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
---
3.884G
3.377G
1.355G
464.5M
387.5M
147.2M
71.59M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
38.17%
---
405.7T
---
37.14%
---
550.6G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
1.063P
---
100.00%
---
1.482T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.03% 351.3G 0.17% 2.496G
IGMP[2]0.00% 45.62M 0.00% 1.328M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 75.59G 0.01% 81.80M
TCP[6]88.59% 941.8T 84.94% 1.259T
UDP[17]9.13% 97.07T 13.36% 197.9G
IPv6[41]0.03% 267.9G 0.03% 428.5M
GRE[47]1.59% 16.93T 0.96% 14.23G
ESP[50]0.56% 5.917T 0.50% 7.367G
AX.25[93]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
PIM[103]0.00% 5.814G 0.00% 39.70M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.06% 684.3G 0.04% 622.3M
Total100.00% 1.063P 100.00% 1.482T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)42.08% 623.7G
Medium (100-1400B)22.50% 333.5G
Large (1401-1500B)34.98% 518.6G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.44% 6.576G
Total100.00% 1.482T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.49% 1.025P 96.62% 1.432T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.23% 2.476T 0.25% 3.772G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 92.41G 0.01% 219.3M
Other3.27% 34.73T 3.11% 46.14G
Total100.00% 1.063P 100.00% 1.482T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.43% 4.576T 0.16% 2.363G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19351.71% 18.18T 2.33% 34.57G
164021.54% 16.32T 1.39% 20.67G
600110.76% 8.099T 0.59% 8.689G
30740.66% 6.975T 1.75% 26.00G
150000.41% 4.312T 0.39% 5.792G