Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20081020

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20081020 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 30.03% of octets and 13.97% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.392M 2 10.05M
5 1.483M 8 10.38M
10 1.592M 15 10.91M
50 3.144M 57 16.95M
90 12.71M 59 46.05M
95 22.53M 59 65.55M
99 79.50M 59 145.2M
99.9 209.9M 59 458.8M
99.99 754.2M 101 1.214G
99.999 1.026G 143 3.973G
100 11.20G 165 7.210G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.73% 1.327G
Medium (100-1400B)12.84% 23.49G
Large (1401-1500B)86.36% 157.9G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.08% 142.6M
Total100.00% 182.9G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers38.64% 101.5T 38.67% 70.74G 43.99% 4.461M
Encrypted Traffic9.82% 25.81T 10.11% 18.49G 7.92% 802.9k
Advanced Apps4.27% 11.21T 4.28% 7.831G 5.13% 520.7k
File Sharing3.07% 8.066T 3.04% 5.559G 2.17% 219.8k
Misc1.20% 3.153T 1.23% 2.249G 1.52% 154.3k
Measurement1.18% 3.092T 1.15% 2.111G 0.16% 16.65k
Games0.47% 1.242T 0.47% 867.8M 0.49% 50.19k
Audio/Video0.19% 487.7G 0.19% 347.8M 0.34% 34.74k
Unidentified41.18% 108.2T 40.86% 74.74G 38.27% 3.881M
Total100.00% 262.9T 100.00% 182.9G 100.00% 10.14M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
989.4M150021Unknown [32361]Abilene [11537]Iperf
903.8M150028Brookhaven National Lab [43]Abilene [11537]Iperf
530.4M150010NJEDGE-NET [21976]Abilene [11537]Iperf
426.9M150010INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Abilene [11537]Iperf
181.0M139911NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
174.8M150026NASA GSFC [1701]Unknown [25689]Iperf
155.7M150030NASA GSFC [1701]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
134.5M150013NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]Israeli Academic and Research Network [378]Iperf
121.2M150014NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
105.3M140519NASA-GSFC [1749]UT-Austin [18]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.062G900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]35775 -> 5101
968.5M150060Unknown [25776]Abilene [11537]Shoutcast
630.8M900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]50661 -> 5101
439.3M150012Unknown [25776]LATECH [19564]63007 -> 50002
414.8M150017JPL [127]Oregon State U [4201]Hotline
334.4M150011ONENET [5078]Abilene [11537]3003 -> 51383
323.7M150026NASA GSFC [1701]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline
323.3M150013Nat Lib Med [70]NCREN [81]50411 -> 36411
284.6M150033Nat Lib Med [70]PSC [1206]50080 -> 62513
271.8M149920Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]USC-OBERON [47]55105 -> 50365

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 797.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers47.73% 417.8T 47.31% 619.8G
Encrypted Traffic6.46% 56.59T 6.21% 81.29G
File Sharing2.93% 25.66T 3.04% 39.88G
Misc2.45% 21.40T 4.57% 59.87G
Advanced Apps2.26% 19.78T 1.71% 22.42G
Audio/Video1.30% 11.36T 1.02% 13.39G
Measurement0.50% 4.374T 0.50% 6.496G
Games0.49% 4.275T 0.75% 9.774G
Unidentified35.88% 314.0T 34.89% 457.0G
Total100.00% 875.4T 100.00% 1.310T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
NNTP
FTP
---
44.82%
1.16%
0.88%
0.87%
---
392.4T
10.15T
7.670T
7.642T
---
45.12%
0.78%
0.77%
0.64%
---
591.0G
10.19G
10.14G
8.429G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.22%
2.45%
0.78%
0.01%
0.00%
---
28.18T
21.46T
6.839T
92.97G
7.415G
---
2.46%
3.04%
0.69%
0.01%
0.00%
---
32.25G
39.82G
8.998G
173.7M
37.09M
File Sharing
Shoutcast
Audiogalaxy
BitTorrent
Hotline
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Blubster
Carracho
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.21%
0.68%
0.47%
0.44%
0.10%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.56T
5.951T
4.102T
3.820T
832.2G
248.5G
89.69G
29.20G
12.57G
6.051G
2.953G
371.0M
14.61M
---
1.62%
0.52%
0.49%
0.27%
0.08%
0.05%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
21.22G
6.838G
6.408G
3.480G
999.5M
594.8M
134.7M
42.16M
143.8M
11.63M
3.690M
870.2k
81.80k
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
Port 0
AFS
X11
NFS
Telnet
IRC
NTP
RTIP
MS Windows
SOCKS
AOL AIM
IDENT
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
---
1.57%
0.25%
0.22%
0.21%
0.06%
0.05%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
13.77T
2.208T
1.957T
1.871T
481.9G
458.0G
176.3G
97.00G
83.39G
75.77G
64.95G
56.56G
40.99G
25.93G
21.44G
12.06G
3.264G
---
2.27%
1.46%
0.27%
0.16%
0.07%
0.08%
0.02%
0.04%
0.03%
0.08%
0.04%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
---
29.71G
19.15G
3.524G
2.117G
967.3M
991.3M
259.1M
556.3M
386.8M
988.5M
572.6M
317.3M
60.37M
43.22M
61.52M
96.43M
60.11M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
2.08%
0.17%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
18.17T
1.455T
96.06G
33.15G
18.15G
7.035G
---
1.59%
0.09%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
20.88G
1.233G
84.61M
65.92M
116.4M
46.10M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.84%
0.42%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.348T
3.654T
175.5G
83.56G
58.30G
22.53G
14.64G
4.708G
598.5M
---
0.47%
0.51%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.213G
6.674G
244.0M
113.4M
83.24M
33.59M
22.03M
11.87M
441.4k
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.46%
0.04%
0.00%
---
4.049T
324.3G
0.000
---
0.31%
0.18%
0.00%
---
4.112G
2.384G
0.000
Games
DirectX
Spy Arcade
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.26%
0.07%
0.07%
0.05%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
2.267T
635.8G
612.3G
471.7G
190.9G
63.39G
34.00G
---
0.27%
0.05%
0.12%
0.26%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
---
3.599G
694.2M
1.526G
3.350G
426.2M
110.3M
67.35M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
35.88%
---
314.0T
---
34.89%
---
457.0G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
875.4T
---
100.00%
---
1.310T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.04% 324.3G 0.18% 2.384G
IGMP[2]0.00% 123.0M 0.00% 2.784M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 79.88G 0.01% 79.67M
TCP[6]88.40% 773.8T 83.91% 1.099T
UDP[17]10.08% 88.25T 14.68% 192.2G
IPv6[41]0.02% 182.0G 0.02% 324.1M
GRE[47]0.66% 5.761T 0.49% 6.416G
ESP[50]0.78% 6.839T 0.69% 8.998G
AX.25[93]0.00% 13.20k 0.00% 200.0
PIM[103]0.00% 5.114G 0.00% 46.42M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 95.42G 0.01% 195.6M
Total100.00% 875.4T 100.00% 1.310T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)44.25% 579.6G
Medium (100-1400B)23.81% 311.8G
Large (1401-1500B)31.83% 416.9G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.11% 1.500G
Total100.00% 1.310T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.78% 847.1T 96.63% 1.265T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.29% 2.541T 0.31% 4.056G
EF [DSCP=46]0.02% 194.1G 0.02% 310.8M
Other2.91% 25.49T 3.03% 39.72G
Total100.00% 875.4T 100.00% 1.310T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.21% 1.864T 0.11% 1.485G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
164021.79% 15.66T 1.50% 19.61G
19351.38% 12.05T 2.05% 26.90G
600111.08% 9.494T 0.74% 9.709G
21280.62% 5.467T 0.55% 7.249G
30740.58% 5.067T 1.54% 20.20G