Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20081013

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20081013 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 34.17% of octets and 16.88% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.393M 1 10.05M
5 1.486M 8 10.43M
10 1.601M 16 10.94M
50 3.164M 57 17.32M
90 14.02M 59 51.30M
95 23.76M 59 80.25M
99 81.60M 59 167.5M
99.9 186.6M 59 399.3M
99.99 718.7M 100 1.223G
99.999 1.025G 159 6.424G
100 9.741G 162 7.215G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.44% 1.038G
Medium (100-1400B)9.59% 22.54G
Large (1401-1500B)89.91% 211.3G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.06% 145.0M
Total100.00% 235.0G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers33.45% 113.9T 33.75% 79.31G 40.50% 4.949M
Encrypted Traffic9.63% 32.81T 9.66% 22.71G 7.27% 888.0k
Advanced Apps4.02% 13.69T 4.05% 9.520G 5.38% 657.3k
File Sharing2.73% 9.309T 2.71% 6.377G 2.24% 274.3k
Measurement1.25% 4.255T 1.31% 3.080G 0.16% 19.65k
Misc0.58% 1.983T 0.61% 1.430G 0.90% 109.4k
Games0.31% 1.064T 0.32% 752.3M 0.35% 43.11k
Audio/Video0.14% 484.5G 0.15% 342.9M 0.29% 35.13k
Unidentified47.87% 163.0T 47.44% 111.4G 42.92% 5.245M
Total100.00% 340.5T 100.00% 235.0G 100.00% 12.22M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
990.3M150021Unknown [32361]Abilene [11537]Iperf
886.8M150028Brookhaven National Lab [43]Abilene [11537]Iperf
739.2M900016AMES-NAS [24]NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Iperf
435.3M150028Merit [237]Unknown [32361]Iperf
353.7M149910Merit [237]Abilene [11537]Iperf
333.8M150029Unknown [32361]Merit [237]Iperf
266.5M150034Merit [237]BWI-GIGA-POP [10886]Iperf
265.3M150021Merit [237]U Texas, Arlington [18515]Iperf
253.7M149914U Texas, Arlington [18515]Merit [237]Iperf
247.4M150034Unknown [32361]U Texas, Arlington [18515]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.061G900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]50590 -> 5101
971.9M150059ESnet-East [291]Boston U [111]34537 -> 10000
644.3M150046Unknown [25776]Boston U [111]52755 -> 20000
624.7M900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]52009 -> 5101
366.5M150018JPL [127]Oregon State U [4201]Hotline
365.2M150015Unknown [25776]LATECH [19564]42015 -> 50002
354.9M150015Nat Lib Med [70]Cornell [26]50495 -> 46967
353.7M142255UNL [7896]Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]37128 -> 21157
299.0M150060Nat Lib Med [70]NCREN [81]50411 -> 58852
293.6M150019Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Indiana [87]Rsync

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 973.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers42.91% 427.6T 44.17% 614.9G
Encrypted Traffic6.33% 63.04T 6.06% 84.31G
File Sharing2.80% 27.88T 2.84% 39.54G
Advanced Apps2.37% 23.66T 1.86% 25.94G
Misc2.04% 20.33T 3.93% 54.69G
Audio/Video1.38% 13.74T 1.09% 15.14G
Measurement0.56% 5.538T 0.55% 7.635G
Games0.40% 3.971T 0.67% 9.333G
Unidentified41.22% 410.8T 38.83% 540.6G
Total100.00% 996.6T 100.00% 1.392T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
FTP
Rsync
NNTP
---
39.90%
1.24%
0.91%
0.86%
---
397.6T
12.35T
9.105T
8.527T
---
41.76%
0.96%
0.69%
0.76%
---
581.3G
13.40G
9.597G
10.62G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.57%
2.09%
0.65%
0.01%
0.00%
---
35.61T
20.83T
6.502T
84.80G
7.699G
---
2.72%
2.74%
0.59%
0.01%
0.00%
---
37.80G
38.08G
8.224G
161.4M
37.16M
File Sharing
Shoutcast
Audiogalaxy
BitTorrent
Hotline
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Blubster
Carracho
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.10%
0.76%
0.43%
0.40%
0.08%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.97T
7.552T
4.249T
3.949T
751.3G
272.4G
86.22G
28.41G
12.50G
9.823G
3.280G
722.1M
16.49M
---
1.41%
0.59%
0.45%
0.26%
0.07%
0.05%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
19.56G
8.188G
6.306G
3.585G
918.6M
630.3M
127.7M
45.16M
148.3M
14.51M
4.682M
1.100M
69.90k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
IBP
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
---
2.01%
0.19%
0.15%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
19.98T
1.868T
1.535T
231.3G
28.97G
11.92G
---
1.60%
0.14%
0.09%
0.02%
0.00%
0.01%
---
22.30G
1.940G
1.300G
218.9M
63.73M
114.1M
Misc
Mail
Port 0
DNS
Squid
X11
AFS
NFS
Telnet
IRC
RTIP
NTP
MS Windows
AOL AIM
SOCKS
IDENT
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
---
1.19%
0.27%
0.21%
0.21%
0.05%
0.04%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
11.87T
2.718T
2.053T
2.049T
484.5G
363.8G
255.2G
127.9G
95.39G
85.97G
73.64G
43.52G
37.35G
35.82G
19.00G
11.45G
4.712G
---
1.98%
0.19%
1.08%
0.27%
0.08%
0.06%
0.03%
0.04%
0.03%
0.06%
0.07%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
---
27.57G
2.679G
15.10G
3.704G
1.058G
893.7M
357.8M
562.5M
421.3M
798.0M
962.0M
295.1M
54.79M
65.80M
63.22M
91.41M
12.12M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.97%
0.37%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.650T
3.718T
182.6G
80.34G
63.52G
25.84G
14.29G
6.116G
1.623G
---
0.57%
0.48%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.871G
6.735G
266.0M
108.6M
82.36M
33.73M
24.09M
16.82M
1.197M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.52%
0.03%
0.00%
---
5.219T
319.0G
0.000
---
0.37%
0.18%
0.00%
---
5.183G
2.452G
0.000
Games
DirectX
Spy Arcade
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.21%
0.06%
0.05%
0.05%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
2.109T
559.7G
519.8G
477.0G
210.8G
60.72G
33.65G
---
0.24%
0.04%
0.10%
0.25%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
---
3.332G
594.8M
1.399G
3.423G
409.5M
100.9M
72.63M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
41.22%
---
410.8T
---
38.83%
---
540.6G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
996.6T
---
100.00%
---
1.392T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.03% 319.0G 0.18% 2.452G
IGMP[2]0.00% 43.29M 0.00% 1.185M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 54.22G 0.01% 74.09M
TCP[6]86.99% 866.9T 83.28% 1.159T
UDP[17]9.11% 90.81T 13.40% 186.5G
IPv6[41]0.02% 179.5G 0.02% 312.8M
GRE[47]3.18% 31.67T 2.51% 34.98G
ESP[50]0.65% 6.502T 0.59% 8.224G
AX.25[93]0.00% 23.70k 0.00% 200.0
PIM[103]0.00% 4.403G 0.00% 33.74M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 87.26G 0.01% 183.1M
Total100.00% 996.6T 100.00% 1.392T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)41.83% 582.2G
Medium (100-1400B)22.29% 310.3G
Large (1401-1500B)35.61% 495.7G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.27% 3.790G
Total100.00% 1.392T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]97.22% 968.9T 97.07% 1.351T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.24% 2.435T 0.29% 3.969G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 43.70G 0.02% 217.9M
Other2.53% 25.18T 2.62% 36.53G
Total100.00% 996.6T 100.00% 1.392T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.34% 3.384T 0.18% 2.517G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
164021.33% 13.30T 1.20% 16.71G
19351.33% 13.26T 1.96% 27.28G
600110.96% 9.542T 0.72% 10.05G
200000.67% 6.695T 0.40% 5.525G
21280.65% 6.428T 0.68% 9.445G