Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20080721

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20080721 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 46.10% of octets and 25.43% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.389M 1 10.06M
5 1.481M 8 10.50M
10 1.594M 15 10.95M
50 3.449M 58 18.61M
90 14.66M 59 59.70M
95 24.91M 59 81.00M
99 97.60M 59 166.8M
99.9 176.8M 59 447.9M
99.99 867.6M 104 1.112G
99.999 1.080G 119 3.802G
100 37.20G 119 25.69G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.68% 1.399G
Medium (100-1400B)7.52% 15.38G
Large (1401-1500B)91.69% 187.6G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.11% 221.2M
Total100.00% 204.6G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers26.80% 80.17T 27.26% 55.80G 31.82% 3.196M
Encrypted Traffic8.45% 25.28T 8.63% 17.67G 7.14% 717.0k
Advanced Apps5.40% 16.15T 5.50% 11.26G 6.73% 676.2k
File Sharing4.28% 12.81T 4.33% 8.855G 3.82% 383.2k
Measurement2.50% 7.477T 2.46% 5.034G 1.52% 153.1k
Misc0.63% 1.877T 0.67% 1.364G 0.93% 93.37k
Games0.14% 409.4G 0.14% 295.1M 0.18% 17.98k
Audio/Video0.13% 378.0G 0.13% 268.2M 0.26% 26.27k
Unidentified51.68% 154.6T 50.87% 104.1G 47.60% 4.781M
Total100.00% 299.1T 100.00% 204.6G 100.00% 10.04M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
4.757G900018INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]Iperf
4.672G900010INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Abilene [11537]Iperf
3.882G900022DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf
972.8M150045Boston U [111]Brookhaven National Lab [43]Iperf
959.1M150053Boston U [111]ESnet-East [291]Iperf
840.2M150010Merit [237]Abilene [11537]Iperf
448.8M150010Merit [237]Unknown [32361]Iperf
266.2M150010Unknown [32361]Merit [237]Iperf
221.4M150013NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]Israeli Academic and Research Network [378]Iperf
201.1M150060ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
2.699G900019DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]54363 -> 5555
1.055G900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]52587 -> 5101
1.020G900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]47062 -> 5101
993.9M150012CARIN-AS-BLOCK [7082]Science, Technology, and Research Transit Access Point [10764]Hotline
983.8M150047Boston U [111]Unknown [32361]57958 -> 5100
967.0M150027ESnet-East [291]Boston U [111]48416 -> 10000
963.6M150013Boston U [111]ESnet-East [291]52792 -> 10000
928.6M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]37236 -> 5101
896.4M150010SDSC [195]Abilene [11537]47907 -> 3002
711.3M150030Science, Technology, and Research Transit Access Point [10764]CARIN-AS-BLOCK [7082]Hotline

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 806.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers38.77% 251.6T 40.27% 324.1G
Encrypted Traffic6.54% 42.43T 7.26% 58.47G
Advanced Apps3.53% 22.93T 3.25% 26.15G
File Sharing3.46% 22.42T 3.28% 26.39G
Misc3.08% 19.95T 6.00% 48.26G
Audio/Video1.53% 9.917T 1.39% 11.22G
Measurement1.48% 9.626T 1.20% 9.678G
Games0.26% 1.694T 0.39% 3.141G
Unidentified41.35% 268.3T 36.96% 297.5G
Total100.00% 648.9T 100.00% 805.0G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
Rsync
FTP
---
34.07%
1.78%
1.67%
1.26%
---
221.0T
11.53T
10.84T
8.145T
---
36.25%
1.53%
1.35%
1.13%
---
291.8G
12.34G
10.82G
9.135G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
4.25%
1.88%
0.40%
0.01%
0.00%
---
27.56T
12.19T
2.596T
77.11G
5.715G
---
3.99%
2.71%
0.54%
0.02%
0.00%
---
32.13G
21.81G
4.346G
149.7M
30.35M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
2.92%
0.54%
0.07%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
18.94T
3.476T
461.8G
30.41G
17.26G
471.9M
---
2.74%
0.43%
0.06%
0.01%
0.02%
0.00%
---
22.05G
3.441G
451.4M
78.77M
121.3M
1.180M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Shoutcast
Hotline
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Neo-Modus
Blubster
Freenet
Direct Connect++
---
1.70%
0.71%
0.60%
0.36%
0.07%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
11.00T
4.591T
3.878T
2.310T
455.7G
86.16G
62.40G
15.63G
5.467G
4.123G
3.422G
2.202G
593.5M
---
1.22%
1.16%
0.45%
0.35%
0.06%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.829G
9.341G
3.586G
2.796G
503.7M
183.0M
87.04M
17.57M
7.011M
3.038M
41.23M
2.428M
450.9k
Misc
Mail
Port 0
DNS
Squid
NFS
X11
AFS
NTP
IRC
RTIP
Telnet
MS Windows
SOCKS
SNMP
IDENT
AOL AIM
RPC Portmapper
---
1.33%
1.09%
0.27%
0.19%
0.06%
0.06%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.631T
7.073T
1.784T
1.217T
375.2G
364.6G
154.9G
91.07G
63.54G
60.01G
54.14G
36.03G
19.86G
12.77G
10.80G
6.362G
306.3M
---
2.82%
0.63%
1.67%
0.29%
0.05%
0.08%
0.05%
0.15%
0.05%
0.08%
0.06%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
22.74G
5.083G
13.44G
2.299G
369.5M
659.3M
426.0M
1.194G
407.6M
664.9M
473.7M
250.4M
74.67M
101.1M
52.73M
13.60M
2.079M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
Backbone Radio
H.323 Signaling
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
1.08%
0.40%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.024T
2.603T
159.0G
57.79G
47.69G
12.49G
9.247G
3.504G
58.71M
---
0.73%
0.61%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.897G
4.908G
235.3M
77.18M
58.07M
17.38M
22.65M
6.954M
43.30k
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
1.44%
0.05%
0.00%
---
9.326T
299.7G
0.000
---
0.91%
0.29%
0.00%
---
7.314G
2.363G
0.000
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Spy Arcade
Quake
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
---
0.18%
0.03%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.170T
203.1G
124.4G
103.2G
69.18G
19.02G
4.872G
---
0.21%
0.06%
0.09%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.680G
448.0M
755.8M
105.3M
112.1M
29.22M
9.890M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
41.35%
---
268.3T
---
36.96%
---
297.5G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
648.9T
---
100.00%
---
805.0G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.05% 299.7G 0.29% 2.363G
IGMP[2]0.00% 42.10M 0.00% 1.189M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.03% 183.7G 0.03% 234.7M
TCP[6]92.22% 598.4T 88.88% 715.5G
UDP[17]6.42% 41.65T 9.48% 76.30G
IPv6[41]0.00% 21.57G 0.00% 37.66M
GRE[47]0.87% 5.628T 0.75% 6.006G
ESP[50]0.40% 2.596T 0.54% 4.346G
AX.25[93]0.00% 17.70k 0.00% 300.0
PIM[103]0.00% 3.053G 0.00% 29.26M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 77.15G 0.02% 150.2M
Total100.00% 648.9T 100.00% 805.0G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)38.51% 310.0G
Medium (100-1400B)18.57% 149.5G
Large (1401-1500B)42.86% 345.0G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.05% 412.6M
Total100.00% 805.0G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.45% 625.9T 97.16% 782.1G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.02% 155.0G 0.04% 285.8M
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 29.03G 0.01% 112.9M
Other3.52% 22.85T 2.79% 22.45G
Total100.00% 648.9T 100.00% 805.0G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.48% 3.144T 0.28% 2.286G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
543211.80% 11.71T 1.42% 11.46G
21281.06% 6.902T 1.09% 8.744G
200001.00% 6.494T 0.64% 5.148G
19350.87% 5.672T 1.10% 8.821G
200010.60% 3.895T 0.39% 3.112G