Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20080630

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20080630 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 41.61% of octets and 22.70% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.388M 2 10.05M
5 1.483M 6 10.50M
10 1.605M 11 10.99M
50 3.575M 58 18.46M
90 19.45M 59 56.80M
95 29.51M 59 85.35M
99 74.01M 59 175.0M
99.9 186.1M 59 406.1M
99.99 961.0M 73 1.378G
99.999 1.038G 119 5.755G
100 10.65G 121 6.743G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.46% 750.7M
Medium (100-1400B)9.15% 14.99G
Large (1401-1500B)90.27% 147.8G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.12% 190.6M
Total100.00% 163.8G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers29.44% 70.41T 29.82% 48.84G 34.86% 2.804M
Encrypted Traffic10.61% 25.39T 10.85% 17.77G 8.16% 656.0k
Advanced Apps5.98% 14.30T 6.05% 9.914G 7.60% 611.0k
File Sharing3.66% 8.758T 3.64% 5.970G 2.87% 230.7k
Measurement1.61% 3.845T 1.67% 2.743G 0.18% 14.56k
Misc0.61% 1.448T 0.66% 1.078G 0.88% 70.67k
Games0.16% 391.5G 0.17% 275.1M 0.23% 18.54k
Audio/Video0.12% 294.1G 0.13% 211.1M 0.25% 20.42k
Unidentified47.80% 114.3T 47.01% 77.01G 44.98% 3.617M
Total100.00% 239.2T 100.00% 163.8G 100.00% 8.044M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.012G150012Brookhaven National Lab [43]Abilene [11537]Iperf
376.7M150017Merit [237]Abilene [11537]Iperf
368.7M150015Unknown [0]Abilene [11537]Iperf
250.2M149125FR [2200]UNIVHAWAII [6360]Iperf
218.5M150011NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]Israeli Academic and Research Network [378]Iperf
206.6M150016NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]SLAC [3671]Iperf
180.1M138712NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
168.9M150020NASA GSFC [1701]Unknown [25689]Iperf
155.7M150030NASA GSFC [1701]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
125.1M150020Unknown [32361]SWITCH [559]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.049G900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]59666 -> 5101
1.038G900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]43017 -> 5101
977.9M900051INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]ORNL [50]40131 -> 5150
930.9M150010UCLA [52]Abilene [11537]40530 -> 3002
579.3M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]36303 -> 5101
334.9M150021NASA GSFC [1701]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline
299.7M150028Nat Lib Med [70]NCREN [81]50245 -> 49154
250.0M150059Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]UWATERLOO [12093]Rsync
249.4M142011Nat Lib Med [70]Unknown [40127]50209 -> 34386
242.3M150030NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]AMPATH [20080]Hotline

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 612.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers38.21% 219.6T 38.52% 278.0G
Encrypted Traffic7.30% 41.99T 7.99% 57.66G
File Sharing3.88% 22.32T 4.36% 31.47G
Advanced Apps3.55% 20.39T 3.23% 23.32G
Misc2.87% 16.51T 5.63% 40.61G
Audio/Video1.71% 9.856T 1.49% 10.72G
Measurement0.86% 4.941T 0.87% 6.270G
Games0.28% 1.590T 0.39% 2.835G
Unidentified41.33% 237.6T 37.52% 270.7G
Total100.00% 574.9T 100.00% 721.7G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
NNTP
FTP
---
33.24%
1.97%
1.56%
1.44%
---
191.1T
11.30T
8.961T
8.283T
---
34.22%
1.60%
1.37%
1.33%
---
247.0G
11.56G
9.851G
9.601G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
4.77%
2.12%
0.40%
0.01%
0.00%
---
27.42T
12.21T
2.275T
76.21G
5.502G
---
4.59%
2.86%
0.51%
0.02%
0.00%
---
33.13G
20.66G
3.703G
143.1M
29.88M
File Sharing
Shoutcast
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Blubster
Carracho
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.68%
1.10%
0.67%
0.28%
0.12%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.659T
6.334T
3.869T
1.583T
690.0G
100.1G
54.54G
24.83G
3.880G
2.917G
1.152G
862.3M
904.8k
---
2.60%
0.85%
0.51%
0.25%
0.11%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
18.74G
6.160G
3.648G
1.821G
760.6M
188.2M
72.39M
31.17M
43.20M
4.891M
1.292M
1.190M
8.800k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
BBFTP
GsiFTP
IBP
---
3.02%
0.47%
0.05%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
17.36T
2.708T
258.8G
31.30G
28.17G
2.167G
---
2.78%
0.39%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
20.06G
2.819G
250.4M
121.4M
71.84M
3.549M
Misc
Mail
Port 0
DNS
Squid
NFS
X11
AFS
IRC
NTP
Telnet
MS Windows
RTIP
SOCKS
SNMP
IDENT
AOL AIM
RPC Portmapper
---
1.18%
0.96%
0.25%
0.22%
0.11%
0.07%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.766T
5.501T
1.451T
1.265T
628.1G
394.3G
250.5G
53.20G
49.30G
41.52G
35.57G
33.05G
14.13G
11.36G
9.410G
7.869G
383.3M
---
2.58%
0.59%
1.59%
0.31%
0.08%
0.11%
0.08%
0.04%
0.09%
0.06%
0.04%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
18.60G
4.235G
11.50G
2.232G
596.7M
780.1M
569.1M
294.6M
644.8M
423.2M
261.9M
248.2M
60.75M
88.50M
46.08M
10.72M
2.021M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
1.28%
0.39%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.345T
2.263T
152.5G
39.78G
39.71G
8.734G
4.042G
2.795G
12.06M
---
0.86%
0.58%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.221G
4.150G
229.6M
46.02M
52.44M
13.46M
8.639M
4.126M
8.900k
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.78%
0.08%
0.00%
---
4.484T
456.2G
0.000
---
0.58%
0.29%
0.00%
---
4.167G
2.103G
0.000
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Spy Arcade
Quake
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
---
0.20%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.136T
189.9G
92.06G
77.62G
73.28G
15.69G
4.974G
---
0.23%
0.05%
0.08%
0.01%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.648G
388.7M
571.5M
74.34M
121.0M
21.64M
10.23M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
41.33%
---
237.6T
---
37.52%
---
270.7G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
574.9T
---
100.00%
---
721.7G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.08% 456.2G 0.29% 2.103G
IGMP[2]0.00% 43.94M 0.00% 1.193M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.02% 122.5G 0.02% 176.8M
TCP[6]86.85% 499.2T 83.53% 602.8G
UDP[17]7.71% 44.31T 11.55% 83.35G
IPv6[41]0.00% 7.082G 0.00% 24.94M
GRE[47]4.93% 28.34T 4.05% 29.23G
ESP[50]0.40% 2.275T 0.51% 3.703G
AX.25[93]0.00% 33.00k 0.00% 500.0
PIM[103]0.00% 3.028G 0.00% 29.18M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 83.50G 0.03% 234.1M
Total100.00% 574.9T 100.00% 721.7G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)38.35% 276.7G
Medium (100-1400B)20.09% 144.9G
Large (1401-1500B)39.67% 286.2G
Jumbo (>1500B)1.90% 13.69G
Total100.00% 721.7G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.16% 552.8T 96.91% 699.3G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.04% 256.9G 0.05% 359.1M
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 22.25G 0.01% 96.85M
Other3.80% 21.82T 3.03% 21.87G
Total100.00% 574.9T 100.00% 721.7G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.45% 2.604T 0.27% 1.932G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
21281.18% 6.788T 1.22% 8.826G
19350.82% 4.740T 1.01% 7.291G
45000.38% 2.160T 0.38% 2.768G
150000.35% 2.022T 0.39% 2.823G
44440.34% 1.950T 0.20% 1.440G