Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20080331

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20080331 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, data for the following day(s) were missing: Thursday, Friday, Saturday. We multiplied all nominal quantities by 7/4 to estimate the amounts of various types of traffic. Percentages and distributions were not modified.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 34.01% of octets and 16.37% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.390M 2 10.05M
5 1.472M 9 10.44M
10 1.569M 19 10.95M
50 2.917M 58 17.25M
90 13.20M 59 45.00M
95 22.18M 59 67.07M
99 61.27M 59 163.2M
99.9 143.6M 59 374.4M
99.99 837.6M 59 1.236G
99.999 1.022G 119 3.146G
100 129.6G 147 3.838G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.37% 750.2M
Medium (100-1400B)6.72% 13.47G
Large (1401-1500B)92.70% 185.8G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.21% 412.0M
Total100.00% 200.5G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers25.71% 76.07T 26.28% 52.68G 29.95% 3.366M
Encrypted Traffic6.44% 19.05T 6.59% 13.20G 4.99% 561.2k
File Sharing3.92% 11.60T 3.96% 7.949G 3.09% 347.7k
Advanced Apps3.33% 9.868T 3.39% 6.795G 4.00% 449.5k
Measurement1.17% 3.463T 0.68% 1.361G 0.13% 14.31k
Misc0.42% 1.252T 0.45% 893.9M 0.72% 80.84k
Games0.18% 544.9G 0.19% 383.0M 0.22% 24.50k
Audio/Video0.13% 398.5G 0.14% 279.7M 0.25% 28.16k
Unidentified58.68% 173.6T 58.33% 116.9G 56.65% 6.368M
Total100.00% 295.9T 100.00% 200.5G 100.00% 11.24M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.043G900021Abilene [11537]ESNET [3428]Iperf
983.8M900030ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]Iperf
265.8M148318Unknown [32361]SWITCH [559]Iperf
182.1M139110NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
175.9M150030NASA Internet [297]Unknown [25689]Iperf
169.1M150020NASA GSFC [1701]Unknown [25689]Iperf
157.2M150022NASA GSFC [1701]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
153.3M150023NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]Israeli Academic and Research Network [378]Iperf
100.4M150017DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]CARIN-AS-BLOCK [7082]Iperf
94.79M150010Arctic Region Supercomputing Center [14077]Abilene [11537]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.041G900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]38823 -> 5101
1.030G900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]48393 -> 5101
545.5M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]56917 -> 5101
491.7M900011NCSA [1224]TACCNET [32093]35017 -> 50007
308.6M150060Iowa State U [2698]UT-Austin [18]Rsync
245.8M142012Nat Lib Med [70]Unknown [40127]50121 -> 37689
243.8M142010NASA Internet [297]UIUC [38]11784 -> 51210
240.4M149910NOAA [6629]Unknown [27446]48115 -> 46882
239.2M150030NASA GSFC [1701]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline
227.8M149930NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]AMPATH [20080]Hotline

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 924.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers41.42% 360.4T 43.05% 527.2G
Encrypted Traffic5.02% 43.66T 5.25% 64.24G
File Sharing3.45% 30.00T 3.64% 44.59G
Misc2.14% 18.60T 4.21% 51.52G
Advanced Apps1.85% 16.09T 1.60% 19.55G
Audio/Video1.18% 10.27T 1.15% 14.06G
Measurement0.54% 4.734T 0.49% 5.941G
Games0.38% 3.265T 0.69% 8.421G
Unidentified44.02% 383.0T 39.94% 489.2G
Total100.00% 870.1T 100.00% 1.224T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
NNTP
FTP
---
37.33%
1.79%
1.38%
0.92%
---
324.8T
15.57T
12.00T
8.012T
---
39.99%
1.22%
1.06%
0.77%
---
489.8G
14.99G
12.97G
9.484G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.53%
1.91%
0.56%
0.01%
0.00%
---
21.97T
16.65T
4.910T
106.0G
6.563G
---
2.26%
2.45%
0.52%
0.02%
0.00%
---
27.70G
29.99G
6.334G
191.1M
30.45M
File Sharing
Shoutcast
Audiogalaxy
BitTorrent
Hotline
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Blubster
Carracho
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.17%
1.16%
0.50%
0.44%
0.12%
0.05%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.16T
10.05T
4.316T
3.854T
1.035T
411.4G
93.52G
39.87G
17.88G
7.733G
3.969G
314.8M
51.44M
---
1.68%
0.86%
0.57%
0.31%
0.10%
0.08%
0.01%
0.00%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
20.59G
10.54G
6.988G
3.829G
1.257G
940.2M
144.0M
59.62M
213.4M
12.69M
4.434M
759.3k
66.32k
Misc
Mail
Port 0
DNS
Squid
X11
AFS
NFS
RTIP
IRC
NTP
Telnet
MS Windows
AOL AIM
IDENT
SOCKS
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
---
1.12%
0.44%
0.22%
0.20%
0.06%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.717T
3.823T
1.911T
1.713T
525.6G
296.4G
114.6G
105.0G
102.4G
50.05G
48.08G
47.21G
46.58G
43.64G
40.29G
21.20G
1.891G
---
1.95%
0.31%
1.30%
0.23%
0.09%
0.06%
0.01%
0.06%
0.05%
0.05%
0.03%
0.03%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
---
23.87G
3.852G
15.92G
2.795G
1.159G
675.1M
178.0M
733.5M
633.3M
651.0M
360.7M
370.2M
51.87M
91.74M
57.30M
114.7M
4.219M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
IBP
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
---
1.50%
0.22%
0.09%
0.04%
0.00%
0.00%
---
13.07T
1.886T
761.1G
329.7G
32.57G
12.31G
---
1.21%
0.28%
0.07%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
---
14.81G
3.411G
808.5M
330.9M
70.08M
118.0M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.74%
0.38%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.459T
3.321T
223.9G
140.7G
98.78G
20.88G
8.679G
4.865G
0.000
---
0.51%
0.58%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.218G
7.156G
337.9M
179.2M
122.5M
29.33M
12.33M
11.37M
0.000
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.51%
0.06%
0.00%
---
4.422T
544.8G
3.946M
---
0.26%
0.39%
0.00%
---
3.187G
4.820G
54.81k
Games
DirectX
Half-Life
Battlenet
Quake
Spy Arcade
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.25%
0.04%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.199T
367.5G
348.1G
161.9G
125.0G
32.41G
31.43G
---
0.29%
0.25%
0.10%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
3.499G
3.018G
1.226G
335.2M
177.6M
103.5M
60.34M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
44.02%
---
383.0T
---
39.94%
---
489.2G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
870.1T
---
100.00%
---
1.224T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.06% 544.8G 0.39% 4.820G
IGMP[2]0.00% 43.24M 0.00% 1.187M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 68.99G 0.01% 111.7M
TCP[6]89.65% 780.0T 85.49% 1.047T
UDP[17]7.62% 66.28T 12.24% 149.9G
IPv6[41]0.00% 21.89G 0.01% 64.10M
GRE[47]2.11% 18.34T 1.49% 18.29G
ESP[50]0.56% 4.910T 0.52% 6.334G
AX.25[93]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
PIM[103]0.00% 3.789G 0.00% 36.37M
IPMP[169]0.00% 3.946M 0.00% 54.81k
Other0.01% 106.0G 0.02% 191.7M
Total100.00% 870.1T 100.00% 1.224T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)42.48% 520.3G
Medium (100-1400B)21.89% 268.1G
Large (1401-1500B)35.36% 433.1G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.27% 3.321G
Total100.00% 1.224T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.72% 841.6T 97.32% 1.192T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.26% 2.297T 0.33% 4.063G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 46.74G 0.02% 221.7M
Other3.01% 26.17T 2.33% 28.48G
Total100.00% 870.1T 100.00% 1.224T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.31% 2.724T 0.21% 2.548G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19350.49% 4.274T 0.64% 7.807G
163840.31% 2.704T 0.25% 3.094G
33010.30% 2.637T 0.14% 1.772G
21280.29% 2.565T 0.27% 3.301G
200000.27% 2.362T 0.19% 2.346G