Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20080324

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20080324 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, data for the following day(s) were missing: Sunday. We multiplied all nominal quantities by 7/6 to estimate the amounts of various types of traffic. Percentages and distributions were not modified.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 37.59% of octets and 18.31% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.391M 2 10.05M
5 1.477M 8 10.50M
10 1.577M 17 10.95M
50 2.961M 58 17.60M
90 15.34M 59 48.45M
95 26.88M 59 73.80M
99 69.06M 59 171.3M
99.9 186.9M 59 379.2M
99.99 822.9M 59 1.223G
99.999 1.051G 138 2.883G
100 15.50G 138 3.831G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.45% 1.017G
Medium (100-1400B)6.39% 14.37G
Large (1401-1500B)92.98% 209.1G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.17% 392.4M
Total100.00% 224.8G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers22.40% 74.22T 22.91% 51.52G 26.44% 3.232M
Encrypted Traffic6.48% 21.48T 6.70% 15.06G 4.90% 598.7k
File Sharing3.73% 12.37T 3.77% 8.483G 2.80% 342.6k
Advanced Apps3.13% 10.36T 3.19% 7.176G 3.68% 449.8k
Measurement0.98% 3.255T 0.57% 1.272G 0.12% 15.26k
Misc0.37% 1.235T 0.39% 883.1M 0.63% 76.51k
Games0.16% 541.2G 0.17% 382.3M 0.22% 26.95k
Audio/Video0.11% 365.1G 0.12% 261.5M 0.20% 25.02k
Unidentified62.63% 207.5T 62.18% 139.8G 61.00% 7.455M
Total100.00% 331.3T 100.00% 224.8G 100.00% 12.22M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.021G900030Abilene [11537]ESNET [3428]Iperf
990.8M900030ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]Iperf
885.4M149910NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]Abilene [11537]Iperf
211.4M150030NASA Internet [297]Unknown [25689]Iperf
200.9M150018Unknown [32361]SWITCH [559]Iperf
185.6M139510NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
173.8M150016NASA GSFC [1701]Unknown [25689]Iperf
158.3M150030NASA GSFC [1701]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
155.4M150010NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]Israeli Academic and Research Network [378]Iperf
118.9M140013NASA-GSFC [1749]UT-Austin [18]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.081G900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]56606 -> 5101
1.042G900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]37407 -> 5101
646.2M150010INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]U Chicago [160]36246 -> 35353
593.7M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]45484 -> 5101
365.2M150059UW-Milwaukee [7050]NYSERNet [3756]38449 -> 39964
277.9M150025NASA GSFC [1701]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline
262.0M150055Pennsylvania State U [3999]UNL [7896]UNIDATA LDM
256.6M150025DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]Unknown [24167]54126 -> 20008
248.7M150011NOAA [6629]Unknown [27446]55076 -> 33232
248.1M140051Harvard [11]PSC [1207]SSH

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 996.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers38.10% 335.9T 39.84% 489.3G
Encrypted Traffic5.27% 46.46T 5.43% 66.73G
File Sharing3.45% 30.45T 3.66% 44.93G
Misc1.92% 16.96T 4.29% 52.71G
Advanced Apps1.85% 16.30T 1.57% 19.23G
Audio/Video1.10% 9.665T 1.15% 14.13G
Measurement0.52% 4.584T 0.46% 5.694G
Games0.36% 3.211T 0.66% 8.082G
Unidentified47.42% 418.0T 42.94% 527.4G
Total100.00% 881.6T 100.00% 1.228T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
Rsync
FTP
---
34.35%
1.49%
1.30%
0.96%
---
302.8T
13.14T
11.42T
8.485T
---
36.94%
1.13%
0.94%
0.83%
---
453.7G
13.91G
11.53G
10.19G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.73%
1.79%
0.73%
0.02%
0.00%
---
24.10T
15.79T
6.409T
143.3G
7.712G
---
2.43%
2.31%
0.67%
0.02%
0.00%
---
29.86G
28.38G
8.208G
246.8M
33.90M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
Hotline
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Blubster
Carracho
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.24%
1.18%
0.45%
0.42%
0.11%
0.05%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.94T
10.36T
3.957T
3.695T
933.3G
410.5G
82.01G
40.39G
17.16G
6.235G
1.477G
1.248G
100.0M
---
0.91%
1.72%
0.52%
0.30%
0.09%
0.08%
0.01%
0.01%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
11.20G
21.12G
6.370G
3.728G
1.152G
933.8M
132.7M
67.01M
205.2M
11.80M
3.207M
1.818M
308.8k
Misc
Mail
Port 0
DNS
Squid
X11
AFS
NFS
IRC
RTIP
MS Windows
Telnet
NTP
IDENT
AOL AIM
SOCKS
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
---
1.08%
0.26%
0.22%
0.20%
0.06%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.502T
2.302T
1.955T
1.793T
506.4G
279.5G
150.6G
100.7G
94.63G
58.69G
55.04G
49.15G
38.39G
29.78G
28.10G
21.33G
260.2M
---
2.09%
0.19%
1.35%
0.24%
0.11%
0.05%
0.02%
0.05%
0.05%
0.03%
0.03%
0.05%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
---
25.71G
2.281G
16.59G
2.992G
1.290G
634.5M
227.3M
613.2M
637.1M
390.0M
404.0M
635.9M
89.50M
43.36M
53.28M
117.5M
2.114M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
IBP
McIDAS
GsiFTP
BBCP
BBFTP
---
1.44%
0.32%
0.08%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
12.71T
2.777T
747.5G
36.52G
25.75G
8.099G
---
1.16%
0.31%
0.07%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
---
14.27G
3.838G
896.3M
84.22M
28.36M
111.2M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.67%
0.37%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.888T
3.287T
265.3G
134.0G
65.57G
18.35G
3.045G
2.369G
62.33M
---
0.46%
0.63%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.637G
7.793G
394.7M
175.0M
88.03M
30.94M
7.216M
7.086M
45.96k
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.48%
0.04%
0.00%
---
4.254T
385.3G
3.023M
---
0.24%
0.26%
0.00%
---
2.959G
3.190G
41.92k
Games
DirectX
Half-Life
Battlenet
Quake
Spy Arcade
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
---
0.24%
0.04%
0.04%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
2.096T
361.7G
330.9G
176.0G
145.0G
72.17G
29.18G
---
0.27%
0.24%
0.09%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
---
3.307G
2.904G
1.128G
363.1M
194.4M
98.55M
86.02M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
47.42%
---
418.0T
---
42.94%
---
527.4G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
881.6T
---
100.00%
---
1.228T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.04% 385.3G 0.26% 3.190G
IGMP[2]0.00% 43.29M 0.00% 1.204M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.02% 153.2G 0.02% 199.8M
TCP[6]89.87% 792.3T 84.85% 1.042T
UDP[17]7.05% 62.17T 12.51% 153.6G
IPv6[41]0.00% 16.94G 0.00% 59.35M
GRE[47]2.27% 20.03T 1.70% 20.93G
ESP[50]0.73% 6.409T 0.67% 8.208G
AX.25[93]0.00% 12.83k 0.00% 116.0
PIM[103]0.00% 3.502G 0.00% 36.29M
IPMP[169]0.00% 3.023M 0.00% 41.92k
Other0.02% 143.8G 0.02% 254.6M
Total100.00% 881.6T 100.00% 1.228T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)42.48% 521.8G
Medium (100-1400B)20.63% 253.4G
Large (1401-1500B)36.61% 449.7G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.28% 3.389G
Total100.00% 1.228T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.65% 852.1T 97.21% 1.194T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.31% 2.767T 0.36% 4.417G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 51.23G 0.02% 278.9M
Other3.03% 26.73T 2.41% 29.58G
Total100.00% 881.6T 100.00% 1.228T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.33% 2.951T 0.22% 2.707G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19350.76% 6.672T 0.99% 12.12G
200000.71% 6.284T 0.54% 6.596G
33010.61% 5.421T 0.30% 3.637G
21280.58% 5.101T 0.54% 6.607G
500000.46% 4.052T 0.30% 3.711G