Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20080317

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20080317 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 40.53% of octets and 20.03% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.389M 1 10.05M
5 1.477M 7 10.50M
10 1.584M 17 10.95M
50 2.999M 58 17.70M
90 15.86M 59 50.85M
95 28.63M 59 81.00M
99 78.77M 59 188.1M
99.9 220.3M 59 365.3M
99.99 882.8M 126 1.173G
99.999 1.068G 139 2.233G
100 9.925G 139 6.729G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.31% 681.9M
Medium (100-1400B)6.06% 13.21G
Large (1401-1500B)93.48% 203.7G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.14% 311.1M
Total100.00% 218.0G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers21.56% 69.19T 21.98% 47.92G 26.04% 2.983M
Encrypted Traffic6.81% 21.85T 6.96% 15.18G 5.06% 579.8k
File Sharing3.69% 11.84T 3.74% 8.148G 3.01% 344.8k
Advanced Apps3.41% 10.93T 3.46% 7.552G 4.24% 486.1k
Measurement0.95% 3.038T 0.70% 1.532G 0.20% 23.31k
Misc0.44% 1.415T 0.48% 1.050G 0.67% 76.34k
Games0.17% 554.8G 0.18% 385.0M 0.22% 25.06k
Audio/Video0.13% 402.6G 0.14% 295.7M 0.23% 26.71k
Unidentified62.85% 201.7T 62.36% 135.9G 60.32% 6.910M
Total100.00% 320.9T 100.00% 218.0G 100.00% 11.45M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.627G150014APAN-JP [7660]Science, Technology, and Research Transit Access Point [10764]Iperf
967.6M150042ESnet-East [291]Boston U [111]Iperf
912.3M900011ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]Iperf
854.4M150031Boston U [111]ESnet-East [291]Iperf
823.1M150039Boston U [111]Unknown [32361]Iperf
570.8M150030Unknown [32361]Boston U [111]Iperf
328.4M150012CERN1 [1297]RNP [1916]Iperf
194.5M150019Unknown [32361]SWITCH [559]Iperf
175.7M139429NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
174.9M150018NASA GSFC [1701]Unknown [25689]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.048G900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]34897 -> 5101
1.031G900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]45763 -> 5101
582.9M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]34468 -> 5101
438.0M150026Pennsylvania State U [3999]UNL [7896]UNIDATA LDM
303.8M150039UCAR [194]UNL [7896]UNIDATA LDM
273.9M142060Argonne [683]UT-Austin [18]Rsync
247.6M150013Nat Lib Med [70]NCREN [81]50496 -> 36601
247.4M142011Nat Lib Med [70]Unknown [40127]50349 -> 42331
223.3M142012NASA Internet [297]UIUC [38]65265 -> 35084
222.2M150010Rutgers [46]Abilene [11537]44299 -> 3002

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 930.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers36.33% 287.6T 37.73% 410.7G
Encrypted Traffic5.17% 40.97T 5.44% 59.24G
File Sharing3.69% 29.23T 3.72% 40.53G
Advanced Apps2.19% 17.30T 1.78% 19.39G
Misc1.95% 15.46T 4.95% 53.93G
Audio/Video1.38% 10.93T 1.52% 16.53G
Measurement0.61% 4.853T 0.59% 6.372G
Games0.37% 2.896T 0.63% 6.876G
Unidentified48.31% 382.5T 43.63% 474.9G
Total100.00% 791.8T 100.00% 1.088T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
Rsync
FTP
---
32.62%
1.46%
1.28%
0.98%
---
258.2T
11.54T
10.10T
7.732T
---
34.83%
1.11%
0.95%
0.84%
---
379.1G
12.09G
10.37G
9.130G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.05%
1.73%
0.38%
0.01%
0.00%
---
24.18T
13.69T
3.005T
73.75G
6.726G
---
2.79%
2.22%
0.42%
0.02%
0.00%
---
30.39G
24.11G
4.533G
173.6M
30.78M
File Sharing
Shoutcast
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Blubster
Carracho
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.35%
1.31%
0.45%
0.43%
0.10%
0.04%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.70T
10.36T
3.554T
3.385T
809.7G
299.5G
69.45G
26.63G
9.899G
7.411G
1.799G
1.551G
8.265M
---
1.77%
0.94%
0.33%
0.50%
0.10%
0.07%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
19.25G
10.21G
3.600G
5.404G
1.038G
720.8M
110.0M
44.13M
119.1M
13.19M
2.615M
2.552M
54.30k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
IBP
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
---
1.70%
0.35%
0.10%
0.03%
0.00%
0.00%
---
13.46T
2.775T
786.2G
238.5G
31.44G
8.952G
---
1.39%
0.28%
0.08%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
---
15.11G
3.026G
842.6M
238.4M
69.91M
106.3M
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
Port 0
X11
NFS
AFS
IRC
RTIP
Telnet
NTP
MS Windows
SOCKS
IDENT
SNMP
AOL AIM
RPC Portmapper
---
1.11%
0.26%
0.22%
0.16%
0.07%
0.04%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.825T
2.021T
1.767T
1.288T
541.6G
285.3G
270.2G
104.5G
99.32G
50.66G
49.09G
48.19G
41.79G
29.64G
22.21G
17.96G
237.0M
---
2.33%
1.73%
0.27%
0.15%
0.11%
0.03%
0.06%
0.05%
0.08%
0.03%
0.06%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
25.32G
18.82G
2.890G
1.675G
1.242G
272.8M
606.5M
585.7M
861.8M
367.3M
640.3M
338.0M
66.58M
77.75M
120.4M
25.60M
3.778M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.84%
0.48%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.657T
3.820T
231.8G
132.2G
71.11G
18.34G
4.539G
4.168G
26.44M
---
0.58%
0.87%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.361G
9.492G
375.2M
166.2M
88.64M
27.21M
10.81M
8.682M
19.50k
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.57%
0.04%
0.00%
---
4.543T
310.1G
5.037M
---
0.32%
0.27%
0.00%
---
3.438G
2.933G
60.90k
Games
DirectX
Half-Life
Battlenet
Quake
Spy Arcade
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
---
0.26%
0.04%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.031T
292.0G
278.7G
151.2G
92.35G
26.58G
24.02G
---
0.29%
0.21%
0.08%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
---
3.139G
2.308G
896.3M
295.2M
128.1M
44.98M
63.37M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
48.31%
---
382.5T
---
43.63%
---
474.9G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
791.8T
---
100.00%
---
1.088T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.04% 310.1G 0.27% 2.933G
IGMP[2]0.00% 45.16M 0.00% 1.247M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 71.98G 0.01% 109.2M
TCP[6]90.17% 714.0T 83.98% 914.1G
UDP[17]6.59% 52.19T 13.12% 142.8G
IPv6[41]0.00% 26.52G 0.01% 74.88M
GRE[47]2.79% 22.11T 2.18% 23.73G
ESP[50]0.38% 3.005T 0.42% 4.533G
AX.25[93]0.00% 1.765M 0.00% 15.50k
PIM[103]0.00% 3.731G 0.00% 39.18M
IPMP[169]0.00% 5.037M 0.00% 60.90k
Other0.01% 74.26G 0.02% 178.1M
Total100.00% 791.8T 100.00% 1.088T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)42.27% 460.0G
Medium (100-1400B)19.89% 216.5G
Large (1401-1500B)37.45% 407.6G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.39% 4.202G
Total100.00% 1.088T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.25% 762.0T 97.14% 1.057T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.13% 1.061T 0.20% 2.153G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 40.40G 0.02% 204.1M
Other3.61% 28.62T 2.65% 28.79G
Total100.00% 791.8T 100.00% 1.088T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.39% 3.070T 0.25% 2.768G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
200000.76% 5.995T 0.60% 6.514G
19350.66% 5.215T 0.84% 9.110G
21280.58% 4.577T 0.54% 5.916G
200010.56% 4.444T 0.40% 4.375G
200020.45% 3.529T 0.31% 3.344G