Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20080310

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20080310 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 36.32% of octets and 17.54% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.385M 1 10.05M
5 1.464M 8 10.37M
10 1.560M 18 10.93M
50 2.895M 58 17.10M
90 13.89M 59 47.40M
95 24.06M 59 72.00M
99 72.30M 59 148.6M
99.9 210.4M 59 334.3M
99.99 608.6M 101 1.072G
99.999 1.017G 119 1.392G
100 21.60G 119 20.54G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.26% 516.7M
Medium (100-1400B)7.33% 14.43G
Large (1401-1500B)92.31% 181.9G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.10% 190.8M
Total100.00% 197.0G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers24.20% 69.82T 24.70% 48.67G 28.13% 3.078M
Encrypted Traffic12.14% 35.03T 12.40% 24.43G 6.76% 739.7k
File Sharing4.20% 12.11T 4.18% 8.246G 3.49% 382.1k
Advanced Apps3.05% 8.792T 3.07% 6.049G 3.65% 398.9k
Misc0.49% 1.401T 0.52% 1.028G 0.78% 85.05k
Measurement0.36% 1.052T 0.37% 725.5M 0.13% 14.70k
Games0.23% 651.7G 0.23% 457.8M 0.28% 31.12k
Audio/Video0.12% 360.6G 0.13% 255.6M 0.23% 25.00k
Unidentified55.21% 159.3T 54.39% 107.1G 56.54% 6.186M
Total100.00% 288.5T 100.00% 197.0G 100.00% 10.94M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
3.408G900020DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf
301.7M150011U Colorado, Boulder [104]PSC [1207]Iperf
195.6M150028NASA GSFC [1701]Unknown [25689]Iperf
187.0M139411NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
157.7M150027NASA Internet [297]Unknown [25689]Iperf
152.8M150028NASA GSFC [1701]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
116.1M139917NASA-GSFC [1749]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
104.0M150012DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]CARIN-AS-BLOCK [7082]Iperf
100.9M150018Unknown [32361]SWITCH [559]Iperf
84.64M150011NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.058G900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]60321 -> 5101
1.041G899410High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]48987 -> 5101
967.0M150041Brookhaven National Lab [43]Boston U [111]46812 -> 20000
737.5M150036Boston U [111]Brookhaven National Lab [43]57293 -> 30000
575.7M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Audiogalaxy
338.5M150053ASD/SCOSI [132]PSC [1207]SSH
311.2M142037Argonne [683]UT-Austin [18]Rsync
270.7M149814Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Unknown [0]HTTP
264.0M150043Princeton [88]Universiy of California, San Diego CA [7377]38018 -> 47594
260.1M150010NOAA [6629]Unknown [27446]49531 -> 54927

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 899.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers38.53% 306.1T 39.92% 448.6G
Encrypted Traffic7.12% 56.52T 6.72% 75.46G
File Sharing3.74% 29.70T 3.73% 41.91G
Misc2.35% 18.69T 7.93% 89.16G
Audio/Video1.95% 15.46T 1.62% 18.16G
Advanced Apps1.91% 15.14T 1.53% 17.15G
Games0.38% 2.988T 0.63% 7.125G
Measurement0.29% 2.293T 0.42% 4.708G
Unidentified43.74% 347.4T 37.50% 421.4G
Total100.00% 794.3T 100.00% 1.123T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
Rsync
FTP
---
35.04%
1.25%
1.22%
1.03%
---
278.3T
9.932T
9.673T
8.179T
---
37.23%
0.98%
0.86%
0.85%
---
418.3G
11.04G
9.642G
9.588G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
4.65%
1.96%
0.49%
0.01%
0.00%
---
36.95T
15.56T
3.884T
114.1G
7.360G
---
3.80%
2.42%
0.48%
0.02%
0.00%
---
42.65G
27.18G
5.381G
208.3M
31.54M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
Hotline
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Blubster
Carracho
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.36%
1.25%
0.50%
0.44%
0.12%
0.04%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.81T
9.953T
4.005T
3.514T
916.1G
356.3G
80.81G
37.76G
11.83G
7.377G
3.556G
2.548G
68.94M
---
0.93%
1.73%
0.55%
0.32%
0.10%
0.07%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.45G
19.45G
6.219G
3.560G
1.111G
773.7M
124.0M
59.38M
138.6M
13.09M
5.831M
2.452M
87.80k
Misc
Mail
DNS
Port 0
Squid
X11
AFS
NFS
IRC
RTIP
Telnet
NTP
SOCKS
MS Windows
IDENT
SNMP
AOL AIM
RPC Portmapper
---
1.19%
0.45%
0.31%
0.23%
0.06%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.450T
3.564T
2.448T
1.802T
438.1G
352.9G
186.7G
85.23G
80.41G
58.52G
50.19G
44.33G
44.06G
42.63G
22.47G
20.11G
553.7M
---
2.26%
4.76%
0.21%
0.28%
0.09%
0.07%
0.02%
0.04%
0.05%
0.03%
0.06%
0.01%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
25.42G
53.47G
2.354G
3.153G
1.028G
804.4M
200.7M
496.1M
525.0M
378.9M
653.5M
80.84M
337.5M
96.31M
119.6M
28.93M
2.251M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
1.50%
0.38%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
11.95T
3.051T
231.1G
133.4G
73.25G
16.67G
6.425G
1.710G
0.000
---
0.94%
0.62%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.56G
6.932G
368.6M
168.4M
90.25M
25.82M
11.42M
4.486M
0.000
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
IBP
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
---
1.60%
0.17%
0.10%
0.03%
0.00%
0.00%
---
12.74T
1.337T
791.8G
227.6G
32.97G
10.56G
---
1.29%
0.13%
0.07%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
---
14.46G
1.466G
811.8M
229.6M
77.30M
104.9M
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Spy Arcade
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
---
0.26%
0.04%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.073T
332.4G
294.7G
132.9G
107.8G
29.61G
17.61G
---
0.29%
0.09%
0.21%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
---
3.259G
977.9M
2.368G
256.3M
156.0M
45.66M
61.59M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.25%
0.04%
0.00%
---
1.994T
299.0G
3.643M
---
0.19%
0.23%
0.00%
---
2.151G
2.556G
50.60k
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
43.74%
---
347.4T
---
37.50%
---
421.4G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
794.3T
---
100.00%
---
1.123T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.04% 299.0G 0.23% 2.556G
IGMP[2]0.00% 93.42M 0.00% 1.807M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 70.66G 0.01% 75.10M
TCP[6]89.01% 707.0T 82.36% 925.5G
UDP[17]7.39% 58.72T 14.68% 164.9G
IPv6[41]0.00% 17.95G 0.01% 64.38M
GRE[47]3.05% 24.18T 2.22% 24.91G
ESP[50]0.49% 3.884T 0.48% 5.381G
AX.25[93]0.00% 6.600k 0.00% 100.0
PIM[103]0.00% 3.825G 0.00% 39.45M
IPMP[169]0.00% 3.643M 0.00% 50.60k
Other0.01% 114.2G 0.02% 209.7M
Total100.00% 794.3T 100.00% 1.123T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)43.60% 490.0G
Medium (100-1400B)20.32% 228.3G
Large (1401-1500B)35.50% 398.9G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.58% 6.525G
Total100.00% 1.123T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]95.20% 756.2T 96.05% 1.079T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.28% 2.235T 0.32% 3.581G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 57.06G 0.02% 238.3M
Other4.51% 35.84T 3.61% 40.54G
Total100.00% 794.3T 100.00% 1.123T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.43% 3.390T 0.27% 3.089G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19350.76% 6.038T 0.99% 11.08G
200000.67% 5.359T 0.49% 5.518G
200010.53% 4.173T 0.31% 3.530G
200020.52% 4.152T 0.30% 3.334G
21280.43% 3.409T 0.39% 4.358G