Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20080303

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20080303 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, data for the following day(s) were missing: Sunday. We multiplied all nominal quantities by 7/6 to estimate the amounts of various types of traffic. Percentages and distributions were not modified.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 35.47% of octets and 17.44% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.386M 1 10.05M
5 1.466M 9 10.41M
10 1.562M 20 10.93M
50 2.805M 58 16.80M
90 13.17M 59 47.25M
95 20.76M 59 71.70M
99 75.36M 59 138.0M
99.9 218.5M 59 310.8M
99.99 777.1M 119 696.6M
99.999 1.065G 120 1.258G
100 14.40G 121 1.890G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.29% 612.0M
Medium (100-1400B)6.77% 14.13G
Large (1401-1500B)92.86% 194.0G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.08% 176.9M
Total100.00% 208.9G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers21.60% 66.36T 22.10% 46.18G 25.23% 3.016M
Encrypted Traffic6.96% 21.39T 7.08% 14.78G 5.12% 612.2k
File Sharing4.09% 12.57T 4.11% 8.579G 3.43% 409.9k
Advanced Apps2.97% 9.134T 3.02% 6.319G 3.59% 429.4k
Measurement0.39% 1.191T 0.46% 968.7M 0.12% 14.00k
Misc0.37% 1.142T 0.39% 822.0M 0.61% 72.70k
Games0.20% 619.8G 0.21% 432.4M 0.26% 31.03k
Audio/Video0.15% 450.6G 0.15% 322.3M 0.24% 28.22k
Unidentified63.27% 194.4T 62.47% 130.5G 61.40% 7.339M
Total100.00% 307.3T 100.00% 208.9G 100.00% 11.95M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
312.4M150010UNIVHAWAII [6360]Abilene [11537]Iperf
200.4M150030NASA GSFC [1701]Unknown [25689]Iperf
198.6M150040U Colorado, Boulder [104]PSC [1207]Iperf
178.5M139522NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
155.7M150016NASA GSFC [1701]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
149.4M150018NASA Internet [297]Unknown [25689]Iperf
132.6M150020Unknown [32361]SWITCH [559]Iperf
108.4M150059IIJNET [2501]FR [2200]Iperf
104.9M140831NASA-GSFC [1749]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
102.3M150010Unknown [1213]CalTech [31]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.049G900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]52574 -> 5101
1.025G900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]60239 -> 5101
585.7M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]36354 -> 5101
254.2M139459Argonne [683]UT-Austin [18]Rsync
235.2M150021DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]Unknown [24167]40004 -> 20005
227.3M142025Nat Lib Med [70]Unknown [40127]50227 -> 38664
217.0M150023Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Indiana [87]Rsync
209.9M150010NOAA [6629]Unknown [27446]52438 -> 56663
205.0M150015Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Unknown [0]Rsync
204.6M149813U Colorado, Boulder [104]PSC [1207]SSH

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 989.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers37.17% 322.0T 39.98% 479.1G
Encrypted Traffic4.82% 41.72T 5.09% 61.03G
File Sharing3.47% 30.09T 3.58% 42.89G
Misc2.22% 19.20T 4.99% 59.79G
Advanced Apps1.97% 17.05T 1.59% 19.09G
Audio/Video1.72% 14.93T 1.54% 18.45G
Games0.39% 3.371T 0.71% 8.450G
Measurement0.31% 2.716T 0.44% 5.251G
Unidentified47.93% 415.2T 42.09% 504.4G
Total100.00% 866.3T 100.00% 1.198T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
Rsync
FTP
---
33.90%
1.33%
1.11%
0.82%
---
293.6T
11.54T
9.657T
7.137T
---
37.39%
1.05%
0.82%
0.72%
---
448.1G
12.58G
9.852G
8.573G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.70%
1.79%
0.32%
0.01%
0.00%
---
23.38T
15.47T
2.761T
87.94G
6.818G
---
2.40%
2.34%
0.33%
0.01%
0.00%
---
28.80G
28.07G
3.957G
171.0M
31.62M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
Hotline
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Blubster
Carracho
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.35%
1.00%
0.48%
0.46%
0.12%
0.05%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
11.71T
8.658T
4.184T
3.958T
1.037T
399.2G
82.72G
37.72G
14.44G
8.080G
2.539G
1.561G
163.0M
---
0.97%
1.49%
0.58%
0.33%
0.10%
0.08%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
11.64G
17.81G
6.976G
3.908G
1.188G
984.9M
127.2M
54.07M
170.5M
14.74M
3.069M
2.008M
610.2k
Misc
Mail
Port 0
DNS
Squid
X11
AFS
IRC
NFS
MS Windows
NTP
AOL AIM
Telnet
SOCKS
IDENT
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
1.13%
0.42%
0.27%
0.23%
0.07%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.823T
3.669T
2.375T
1.969T
565.6G
312.6G
91.70G
88.34G
67.41G
50.79G
50.09G
43.79G
41.64G
36.07G
20.64G
722.0M
456.4M
---
2.06%
0.29%
2.00%
0.27%
0.10%
0.07%
0.03%
0.01%
0.04%
0.06%
0.01%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
24.66G
3.480G
23.99G
3.286G
1.163G
889.7M
410.0M
126.7M
454.8M
660.8M
66.91M
332.3M
63.64M
82.17M
111.5M
2.736M
3.839M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
IBP
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
---
1.47%
0.36%
0.09%
0.04%
0.00%
0.00%
---
12.74T
3.147T
771.1G
340.8G
32.90G
19.28G
---
1.20%
0.27%
0.07%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
---
14.37G
3.288G
897.5M
342.0M
81.20M
111.1M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
1.25%
0.40%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.86T
3.499T
302.8G
179.4G
57.15G
18.95G
3.977G
3.002G
8.068M
---
0.84%
0.63%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.10G
7.551G
463.5M
207.8M
78.45M
30.79M
8.994M
5.821M
5.950k
Games
DirectX
Half-Life
Battlenet
Quake
Spy Arcade
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
---
0.27%
0.04%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.326T
386.5G
350.1G
158.6G
109.7G
24.20G
15.49G
---
0.30%
0.26%
0.09%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.612G
3.166G
1.104G
304.3M
177.7M
41.25M
43.52M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.28%
0.04%
0.00%
---
2.408T
359.0G
3.949M
---
0.23%
0.24%
0.00%
---
2.735G
2.935G
54.85k
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
47.93%
---
415.2T
---
42.09%
---
504.4G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
866.3T
---
100.00%
---
1.198T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.04% 359.0G 0.24% 2.935G
IGMP[2]0.00% 44.10M 0.00% 1.248M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 35.23G 0.00% 43.03M
TCP[6]88.56% 767.1T 84.19% 1.009T
UDP[17]7.15% 61.97T 12.29% 147.2G
IPv6[41]0.00% 16.35G 0.01% 67.65M
GRE[47]3.92% 33.94T 2.96% 35.45G
ESP[50]0.32% 2.761T 0.33% 3.957G
AX.25[93]0.00% 150.0k 0.00% 1.400k
PIM[103]0.00% 3.993G 0.00% 40.51M
IPMP[169]0.00% 3.949M 0.00% 54.85k
Other0.01% 88.00G 0.01% 171.6M
Total100.00% 866.3T 100.00% 1.198T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)42.16% 505.2G
Medium (100-1400B)20.87% 250.1G
Large (1401-1500B)36.16% 433.3G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.81% 9.736G
Total100.00% 1.198T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.80% 838.6T 97.10% 1.163T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.29% 2.539T 0.36% 4.261G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 45.63G 0.02% 214.9M
Other2.90% 25.09T 2.53% 30.27G
Total100.00% 866.3T 100.00% 1.198T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.45% 3.915T 0.29% 3.514G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
200000.97% 8.413T 0.70% 8.423G
200010.81% 7.001T 0.56% 6.745G
200020.73% 6.367T 0.49% 5.917G
200030.65% 5.593T 0.43% 5.135G
19350.60% 5.229T 0.79% 9.414G