Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20080225

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20080225 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 36.05% of octets and 17.70% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.386M 2 10.05M
5 1.470M 10 10.50M
10 1.573M 21 10.95M
50 2.985M 58 17.55M
90 13.08M 59 49.20M
95 21.08M 59 75.00M
99 60.77M 59 152.6M
99.9 201.8M 72 426.0M
99.99 765.6M 119 1.611G
99.999 1.018G 145 5.166G
100 9.233G 145 6.615G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)1.17% 2.333G
Medium (100-1400B)7.11% 14.15G
Large (1401-1500B)91.63% 182.3G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.09% 174.7M
Total100.00% 199.0G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers23.43% 67.83T 23.65% 47.06G 28.49% 2.992M
Encrypted Traffic7.14% 20.66T 7.20% 14.32G 5.92% 622.0k
File Sharing5.87% 16.98T 6.66% 13.26G 3.62% 379.6k
Advanced Apps2.41% 6.986T 2.43% 4.828G 3.07% 322.4k
Measurement0.43% 1.242T 0.48% 947.2M 0.13% 14.12k
Misc0.37% 1.075T 0.39% 768.4M 0.67% 70.17k
Games0.19% 549.4G 0.19% 383.1M 0.25% 26.15k
Audio/Video0.15% 432.8G 0.16% 309.5M 0.26% 26.82k
Unidentified60.01% 173.7T 58.85% 117.1G 57.59% 6.047M
Total100.00% 289.4T 100.00% 199.0G 100.00% 10.50M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
907.4M150030ESnet-East [291]Boston U [111]Iperf
772.4M150010Unknown [20965]Abilene [11537]Iperf
607.4M150059Boston U [111]ESnet-East [291]Iperf
305.9M150015Unknown [32361]SWITCH [559]Iperf
200.6M150030NASA GSFC [1701]Unknown [25689]Iperf
186.7M139520NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
158.5M150030NASA Internet [297]Unknown [25689]Iperf
157.9M150030NASA GSFC [1701]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
137.4M140713NASA-GSFC [1749]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
102.6M150059Unknown [1213]CalTech [31]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.062G900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]52952 -> 5101
1.048G900018NCSA [1224]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]60530 -> 5150
1.018G900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]40358 -> 5101
977.0M150030INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]ORNL [50]59225 -> 5150
943.2M150038Brookhaven National Lab [43]Boston U [111]54851 -> 20000
847.4M150060NCREN [81]APAN-JP [7660]Shoutcast
779.6M150014Boston U [111]Brookhaven National Lab [43]60192 -> 20000
732.9M150058PSC [1207]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]60296 -> 5150
557.1M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]55402 -> 5101
346.4M149923UCAR [194]UNL [7896]UNIDATA LDM

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 872.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers38.71% 310.7T 41.55% 467.2G
Encrypted Traffic5.30% 42.59T 5.54% 62.26G
File Sharing3.48% 27.93T 3.06% 34.42G
Misc1.98% 15.89T 4.39% 49.39G
Advanced Apps1.72% 13.80T 1.40% 15.75G
Audio/Video1.49% 11.97T 1.36% 15.24G
Games0.41% 3.314T 0.78% 8.715G
Measurement0.36% 2.854T 0.52% 5.879G
Unidentified46.55% 373.7T 41.40% 465.4G
Total100.00% 802.9T 100.00% 1.124T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
Rsync
FTP
---
34.95%
1.56%
1.26%
0.94%
---
280.6T
12.50T
10.13T
7.540T
---
38.62%
1.20%
0.92%
0.82%
---
434.2G
13.44G
10.35G
9.196G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.83%
1.78%
0.68%
0.01%
0.00%
---
22.72T
14.32T
5.435T
110.2G
6.265G
---
2.59%
2.33%
0.60%
0.02%
0.00%
---
29.10G
26.22G
6.693G
205.0M
28.69M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
Hotline
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Blubster
Carracho
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.32%
0.93%
0.54%
0.50%
0.11%
0.05%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.58T
7.465T
4.364T
4.019T
907.5G
441.2G
89.92G
32.98G
17.50G
8.153G
2.256G
1.713G
368.1M
---
0.93%
0.88%
0.68%
0.35%
0.10%
0.09%
0.01%
0.00%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.43G
9.841G
7.637G
3.984G
1.094G
1.021G
132.8M
53.94M
202.3M
13.96M
3.371M
2.193M
381.0k
Misc
Mail
DNS
Port 0
Squid
X11
AFS
IRC
NFS
MS Windows
Telnet
NTP
AOL AIM
IDENT
SOCKS
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
1.12%
0.24%
0.23%
0.23%
0.05%
0.05%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.991T
1.931T
1.868T
1.847T
422.0G
366.7G
84.58G
74.24G
72.64G
66.13G
47.81G
39.20G
35.64G
22.68G
18.46G
701.9M
72.90M
---
2.07%
1.41%
0.18%
0.28%
0.07%
0.19%
0.04%
0.01%
0.04%
0.03%
0.06%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
23.22G
15.85G
1.999G
3.135G
812.6M
2.096G
400.6M
107.8M
480.5M
346.8M
621.5M
50.00M
100.0M
49.48M
103.5M
3.979M
481.5k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
IBP
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
---
1.42%
0.18%
0.09%
0.03%
0.00%
0.00%
---
11.42T
1.431T
683.2G
219.4G
34.58G
14.65G
---
1.17%
0.13%
0.07%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
---
13.10G
1.420G
825.5M
210.8M
86.37M
108.8M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
1.03%
0.39%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.250T
3.135T
331.0G
146.3G
89.23G
19.48G
2.985G
2.923G
0.000
---
0.69%
0.60%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.722G
6.693G
481.1M
183.1M
113.9M
29.76M
14.10M
5.288M
0.000
Games
DirectX
Half-Life
Battlenet
Quake
Spy Arcade
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
---
0.27%
0.05%
0.04%
0.02%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.146T
432.3G
358.0G
169.3G
148.9G
32.71G
27.41G
---
0.31%
0.31%
0.10%
0.03%
0.02%
0.00%
0.01%
---
3.437G
3.470G
1.149G
332.5M
198.2M
46.38M
79.43M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.31%
0.05%
0.00%
---
2.461T
393.2G
4.161M
---
0.26%
0.27%
0.00%
---
2.880G
2.999G
57.80k
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
46.55%
---
373.7T
---
41.40%
---
465.4G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
802.9T
---
100.00%
---
1.124T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.05% 393.2G 0.27% 2.999G
IGMP[2]0.00% 40.60M 0.00% 1.196M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 22.55G 0.00% 27.77M
TCP[6]90.27% 724.8T 86.03% 967.2G
UDP[17]6.43% 51.64T 11.18% 125.7G
IPv6[41]0.00% 19.80G 0.01% 78.29M
GRE[47]2.55% 20.46T 1.90% 21.32G
ESP[50]0.68% 5.435T 0.60% 6.693G
AX.25[93]0.00% 178.2k 0.00% 1.600k
PIM[103]0.00% 4.071G 0.00% 40.23M
IPMP[169]0.00% 4.161M 0.00% 57.80k
Other0.01% 110.3G 0.02% 205.6M
Total100.00% 802.9T 100.00% 1.124T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)42.68% 479.8G
Medium (100-1400B)20.83% 234.1G
Large (1401-1500B)36.05% 405.2G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.44% 4.987G
Total100.00% 1.124T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.75% 776.8T 97.08% 1.091T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.34% 2.768T 0.39% 4.406G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 43.05G 0.02% 203.9M
Other2.90% 23.24T 2.51% 28.16G
Total100.00% 802.9T 100.00% 1.124T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.49% 3.903T 0.31% 3.450G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
200001.11% 8.896T 0.78% 8.738G
200010.83% 6.666T 0.51% 5.720G
19350.67% 5.414T 0.91% 10.18G
200030.64% 5.139T 0.37% 4.152G
200020.60% 4.853T 0.35% 3.961G