Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20080218

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20080218 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 32.46% of octets and 15.41% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.384M 3 10.05M
5 1.461M 13 10.36M
10 1.553M 24 10.85M
50 2.866M 58 17.10M
90 9.770M 59 42.90M
95 15.86M 59 61.65M
99 42.77M 59 128.7M
99.9 117.0M 117 339.7M
99.99 654.5M 120 1.088G
99.999 1.025G 143 1.624G
100 208.8G 144 3.878G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.40% 673.1M
Medium (100-1400B)7.56% 12.59G
Large (1401-1500B)91.93% 153.1G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.10% 165.7M
Total100.00% 166.5G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers28.60% 69.58T 28.96% 48.22G 30.69% 3.002M
Encrypted Traffic7.54% 18.34T 7.58% 12.62G 6.11% 597.7k
File Sharing4.57% 11.11T 4.59% 7.645G 3.48% 340.0k
Advanced Apps2.90% 7.064T 2.93% 4.879G 3.33% 325.5k
Misc0.50% 1.210T 0.62% 1.037G 0.70% 68.75k
Measurement0.33% 809.2G 0.41% 685.9M 0.14% 13.28k
Games0.24% 590.6G 0.25% 417.3M 0.29% 28.66k
Audio/Video0.15% 370.4G 0.16% 259.1M 0.26% 25.15k
Unidentified55.16% 134.1T 54.51% 90.78G 55.01% 5.381M
Total100.00% 243.2T 100.00% 166.5G 100.00% 9.782M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
219.9M150012Unknown [32361]SWITCH [559]Iperf
202.3M150013NASA GSFC [1701]Unknown [25689]Iperf
188.1M139811NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
158.0M150026NASA GSFC [1701]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
155.4M150021NASA Internet [297]Unknown [25689]Iperf
134.8M140322NASA-GSFC [1749]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
114.7M150056IIJNET [2501]FR [2200]Iperf
93.26M150037DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]CARIN-AS-BLOCK [7082]Iperf
80.06M150012NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
65.03M150014NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]UT-Austin [18]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.055G900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]53987 -> 5101
1.034G900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]58019 -> 5101
584.8M144838DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]UMBC [11131]SSH
547.7M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]40463 -> 5101
524.0M107212DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]Unknown [36375]IRC
514.8M107213DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]U Minnesota [217]IRC
482.5M150032NCREN [81]APAN-JP [7660]Shoutcast
373.3M150010EPFL [6189]Abilene [11537]35337 -> 3002
370.7M150010Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Unknown [0]49476 -> 50218
340.6M150010USF [5661]Abilene [11537]43872 -> 3002

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 826.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers40.57% 304.0T 42.31% 457.3G
Encrypted Traffic5.29% 39.66T 5.40% 58.38G
File Sharing2.81% 21.06T 2.54% 27.43G
Misc2.11% 15.79T 4.50% 48.67G
Advanced Apps1.76% 13.17T 1.42% 15.36G
Audio/Video1.71% 12.78T 1.47% 15.86G
Games0.47% 3.490T 0.86% 9.261G
Measurement0.32% 2.409T 0.56% 6.039G
Unidentified44.97% 337.0T 40.94% 442.4G
Total100.00% 749.5T 100.00% 1.080T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
Rsync
FTP
---
36.78%
1.52%
1.27%
1.00%
---
275.6T
11.40T
9.495T
7.493T
---
39.38%
1.18%
0.89%
0.86%
---
425.6G
12.79G
9.646G
9.253G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.77%
1.91%
0.60%
0.01%
0.00%
---
20.73T
14.33T
4.494T
96.20G
7.871G
---
2.46%
2.42%
0.50%
0.02%
0.00%
---
26.63G
26.12G
5.410G
178.2M
31.83M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
BitTorrent
Hotline
Shoutcast
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Blubster
Carracho
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.24%
0.59%
0.50%
0.27%
0.14%
0.06%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.305T
4.394T
3.756T
1.994T
1.033T
454.4G
69.99G
29.30G
17.67G
6.663G
5.108G
1.183G
16.66M
---
0.89%
0.69%
0.35%
0.37%
0.11%
0.09%
0.01%
0.00%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.598G
7.428G
3.797G
4.012G
1.209G
1.002G
113.2M
45.82M
206.8M
12.32M
5.383M
1.760M
39.00k
Misc
Mail
Port 0
DNS
Squid
X11
AFS
IRC
NFS
MS Windows
Telnet
IDENT
NTP
SOCKS
AOL AIM
SNMP
RTIP
RPC Portmapper
---
1.13%
0.27%
0.27%
0.26%
0.07%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.481T
2.020T
2.014T
1.942T
503.6G
269.5G
162.7G
101.0G
59.55G
52.15G
51.41G
47.81G
32.97G
32.05G
19.91G
1.863G
261.6M
---
2.01%
0.21%
1.58%
0.31%
0.09%
0.07%
0.05%
0.01%
0.04%
0.04%
0.02%
0.06%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
21.76G
2.249G
17.11G
3.354G
956.9M
703.9M
507.7M
142.9M
425.0M
392.2M
197.2M
623.9M
87.68M
41.55M
106.6M
2.238M
2.443M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
IBP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
---
1.61%
0.09%
0.04%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
12.04T
682.1G
319.7G
67.72G
31.26G
24.51G
---
1.30%
0.07%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
---
14.07G
766.0M
273.9M
69.97M
65.80M
119.8M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
1.22%
0.42%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.137T
3.163T
232.5G
131.0G
76.18G
29.07G
5.217G
5.164G
0.000
---
0.79%
0.62%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.510G
6.668G
360.0M
176.7M
95.32M
33.95M
11.24M
8.592M
0.000
Games
DirectX
Half-Life
Battlenet
Quake
Spy Arcade
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.30%
0.06%
0.05%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
---
2.223T
465.8G
409.5G
165.0G
140.1G
45.94G
40.64G
---
0.33%
0.35%
0.11%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
---
3.571G
3.775G
1.219G
327.2M
190.9M
116.9M
59.75M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.28%
0.04%
0.00%
---
2.107T
301.4G
3.470M
---
0.25%
0.31%
0.00%
---
2.667G
3.371G
48.20k
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
44.97%
---
337.0T
---
40.94%
---
442.4G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
749.5T
---
100.00%
---
1.080T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.04% 301.4G 0.31% 3.371G
IGMP[2]0.00% 41.60M 0.00% 1.227M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 6.746G 0.00% 10.97M
TCP[6]88.89% 666.2T 84.52% 913.5G
UDP[17]7.31% 54.82T 12.32% 133.1G
IPv6[41]0.00% 32.73G 0.01% 93.08M
GRE[47]3.14% 23.54T 2.31% 24.98G
ESP[50]0.60% 4.494T 0.50% 5.410G
AX.25[93]0.00% 120.0k 0.00% 1.600k
PIM[103]0.00% 4.067G 0.00% 40.29M
IPMP[169]0.00% 3.470M 0.00% 48.20k
Other0.01% 96.25G 0.02% 178.7M
Total100.00% 749.5T 100.00% 1.080T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)43.15% 466.4G
Medium (100-1400B)22.05% 238.3G
Large (1401-1500B)34.61% 374.0G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.19% 2.007G
Total100.00% 1.080T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.93% 726.4T 97.11% 1.049T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.36% 2.680T 0.41% 4.450G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 50.15G 0.02% 248.3M
Other2.71% 20.30T 2.46% 26.55G
Total100.00% 749.5T 100.00% 1.080T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.45% 3.375T 0.27% 2.966G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19350.79% 5.903T 1.02% 10.98G
163840.65% 4.882T 0.52% 5.651G
200000.63% 4.741T 0.46% 5.021G
21280.60% 4.522T 0.53% 5.752G
191010.60% 4.498T 0.43% 4.678G