Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20080211

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20080211 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 33.67% of octets and 16.66% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.381M 3 10.05M
5 1.463M 12 10.40M
10 1.561M 21 10.93M
50 3.151M 58 18.17M
90 10.74M 59 46.20M
95 17.10M 59 64.89M
99 42.47M 59 124.0M
99.9 116.1M 118 347.8M
99.99 703.0M 120 1.160G
99.999 1.030G 127 1.348G
100 201.6G 311 4.732G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)1.84% 3.363G
Medium (100-1400B)7.17% 13.09G
Large (1401-1500B)90.89% 166.0G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.10% 178.5M
Total100.00% 182.6G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers27.12% 71.21T 28.34% 51.75G 29.97% 3.037M
Encrypted Traffic8.74% 22.94T 9.36% 17.10G 7.13% 722.3k
File Sharing4.73% 12.41T 4.64% 8.480G 3.77% 382.4k
Advanced Apps2.63% 6.906T 2.61% 4.772G 3.10% 314.4k
Misc0.40% 1.063T 0.42% 759.7M 0.67% 67.62k
Measurement0.35% 912.3G 0.42% 762.7M 0.17% 17.34k
Games0.23% 614.8G 0.23% 427.2M 0.30% 29.96k
Audio/Video0.13% 344.0G 0.13% 239.6M 0.24% 24.08k
Unidentified55.67% 146.1T 53.85% 98.34G 54.66% 5.540M
Total100.00% 262.5T 100.00% 182.6G 100.00% 10.13M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
706.3M150010U Notre Dame [693]Abilene [11537]Iperf
271.0M150019Unknown [32361]SWITCH [559]Iperf
203.9M150011NASA GSFC [1701]Unknown [25689]Iperf
184.7M138713NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
173.7M150023NASA Internet [297]Unknown [25689]Iperf
157.2M150017NASA GSFC [1701]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
128.8M141027NASA-GSFC [1749]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
94.41M150060DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]CARIN-AS-BLOCK [7082]Iperf
89.80M150010NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
82.55M142016CalTech [31]Ameslab.gov [2640]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.082G900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]45923 -> 5101
1.040G900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]43989 -> 5101
898.4M150017Brookhaven National Lab [43]Boston U [111]52170 -> 20000
579.3M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]53455 -> 5101
554.7M900016Argonne [683]UCAR [194]57581 -> 5150
472.5M900014NCSA [1224]UCAR [194]60504 -> 5150
351.4M150060Iowa State U [2698]UT-Austin [18]Rsync
264.6M142012Nat Lib Med [70]Unknown [40127]50212 -> 50563
248.7M150030NASA GSFC [1701]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline
248.0M150011NOAA [6629]Unknown [27446]33567 -> 35901

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 845.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers39.34% 306.7T 41.91% 459.3G
Encrypted Traffic5.77% 45.02T 5.99% 65.61G
File Sharing2.88% 22.48T 2.62% 28.68G
Misc2.20% 17.18T 4.29% 47.00G
Advanced Apps1.65% 12.87T 1.41% 15.44G
Audio/Video1.35% 10.49T 1.25% 13.69G
Games0.44% 3.433T 0.79% 8.645G
Measurement0.32% 2.466T 0.53% 5.853G
Unidentified46.05% 359.1T 41.22% 451.7G
Total100.00% 779.8T 100.00% 1.096T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
Rsync
FTP
---
35.51%
1.46%
1.41%
0.96%
---
276.8T
11.41T
10.96T
7.506T
---
38.84%
1.13%
1.01%
0.93%
---
425.7G
12.37G
11.10G
10.18G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.29%
1.85%
0.63%
0.01%
0.00%
---
25.65T
14.40T
4.880T
76.84G
10.03G
---
3.04%
2.40%
0.53%
0.01%
0.00%
---
33.33G
26.30G
5.803G
146.7M
32.13M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
BitTorrent
Hotline
Shoutcast
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Blubster
Neo-Modus
Carracho
Freenet
Direct Connect++
---
1.39%
0.57%
0.45%
0.29%
0.10%
0.06%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.81T
4.470T
3.546T
2.263T
790.6G
457.9G
77.47G
28.56G
17.27G
7.753G
6.769G
2.354G
1.382G
---
1.01%
0.70%
0.33%
0.37%
0.09%
0.09%
0.01%
0.00%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
11.01G
7.665G
3.563G
4.092G
960.1M
980.3M
126.4M
51.28M
201.6M
5.716M
11.11M
2.793M
1.091M
Misc
Mail
Port 0
DNS
Squid
X11
AFS
NFS
Telnet
IRC
IDENT
MS Windows
NTP
AOL AIM
SOCKS
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
1.08%
0.47%
0.24%
0.24%
0.07%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.404T
3.691T
1.883T
1.863T
570.1G
247.9G
111.1G
77.31G
72.19G
61.73G
61.59G
47.18G
41.91G
32.50G
21.53G
839.3M
37.67M
---
1.90%
0.30%
1.42%
0.29%
0.10%
0.06%
0.01%
0.04%
0.03%
0.01%
0.04%
0.06%
0.00%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
20.78G
3.341G
15.60G
3.233G
1.104G
609.9M
157.2M
408.3M
380.1M
107.3M
410.4M
614.6M
46.88M
82.10M
116.3M
3.572M
498.4k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
IBP
BBFTP
---
1.52%
0.09%
0.03%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
11.88T
720.9G
219.9G
29.42G
10.53G
9.830G
---
1.29%
0.08%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
---
14.11G
894.7M
188.7M
61.76M
84.86M
101.0M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.87%
0.41%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.793T
3.197T
250.5G
158.2G
67.87G
18.42G
2.799G
1.553G
0.000
---
0.58%
0.61%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.350G
6.651G
372.2M
200.2M
86.76M
27.78M
7.122M
3.872M
0.000
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Spy Arcade
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.28%
0.06%
0.05%
0.02%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.182T
440.3G
416.6G
180.7G
144.6G
35.93G
33.36G
---
0.31%
0.12%
0.30%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
3.435G
1.262G
3.248G
352.2M
202.2M
94.53M
49.79M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.28%
0.04%
0.00%
---
2.176T
289.9G
0.000
---
0.24%
0.29%
0.00%
---
2.637G
3.216G
0.000
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
46.05%
---
359.1T
---
41.22%
---
451.7G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
779.8T
---
100.00%
---
1.096T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.04% 289.9G 0.29% 3.216G
IGMP[2]0.00% 41.50M 0.00% 1.225M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 570.8M 0.00% 3.888M
TCP[6]88.75% 692.1T 85.08% 932.6G
UDP[17]6.20% 48.31T 10.75% 117.8G
IPv6[41]0.00% 35.45G 0.01% 96.79M
GRE[47]4.37% 34.11T 3.31% 36.32G
ESP[50]0.63% 4.880T 0.53% 5.803G
AX.25[93]0.00% 508.3k 0.00% 5.500k
PIM[103]0.00% 3.767G 0.00% 37.98M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 76.89G 0.01% 147.1M
Total100.00% 779.8T 100.00% 1.096T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)42.71% 468.1G
Medium (100-1400B)20.70% 226.9G
Large (1401-1500B)35.63% 390.5G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.96% 10.48G
Total100.00% 1.096T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.74% 754.4T 97.13% 1.064T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.32% 2.485T 0.36% 3.949G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 37.65G 0.02% 186.9M
Other2.94% 22.93T 2.50% 27.36G
Total100.00% 779.8T 100.00% 1.096T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.41% 3.184T 0.25% 2.755G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
400000.78% 6.052T 0.48% 5.292G
19350.76% 5.911T 0.98% 10.73G
400010.66% 5.166T 0.42% 4.569G
163840.66% 5.125T 0.53% 5.824G
200000.61% 4.767T 0.37% 4.077G