Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20080204

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20080204 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 39.52% of octets and 19.91% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.382M 3 10.05M
5 1.473M 11 10.50M
10 1.586M 20 11.07M
50 3.324M 58 19.20M
90 14.10M 59 59.10M
95 21.29M 59 84.34M
99 43.94M 59 144.4M
99.9 106.6M 118 337.6M
99.99 577.8M 119 768.6M
99.999 1.027G 121 1.271G
100 136.8G 148 2.507G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)2.51% 5.687G
Medium (100-1400B)5.89% 13.31G
Large (1401-1500B)91.53% 207.0G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.07% 164.2M
Total100.00% 226.1G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers22.17% 71.94T 24.18% 54.70G 27.42% 3.011M
Encrypted Traffic6.38% 20.71T 6.44% 14.57G 5.88% 645.6k
File Sharing3.26% 10.59T 3.28% 7.429G 2.67% 292.7k
Advanced Apps2.10% 6.825T 2.08% 4.698G 2.83% 311.1k
Misc0.35% 1.125T 0.36% 804.6M 0.62% 68.26k
Measurement0.34% 1.119T 0.41% 929.4M 0.17% 18.90k
Games0.22% 729.5G 0.23% 514.2M 0.32% 34.94k
Audio/Video0.12% 376.4G 0.12% 277.7M 0.23% 25.36k
Unidentified65.05% 211.0T 62.89% 142.2G 59.86% 6.574M
Total100.00% 324.5T 100.00% 226.1G 100.00% 10.98M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
212.9M150011Unknown [32361]SWITCH [559]Iperf
206.2M150011NASA GSFC [1701]Unknown [25689]Iperf
183.7M139323NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
164.7M150023NASA Internet [297]Unknown [25689]Iperf
155.5M150030NASA GSFC [1701]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
136.4M140730NASA-GSFC [1749]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
104.5M150011UNIVHAWAII [6360]Unknown [25689]Iperf
87.76M150060DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]CARIN-AS-BLOCK [7082]Iperf
77.95M142013Nat Lib Med [70]UNL [7896]Iperf
74.47M150014NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.060G900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]50155 -> 5101
1.015G900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]49563 -> 5101
577.8M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]43997 -> 5101
561.1M150028Brookhaven National Lab [43]Boston U [111]54706 -> 36932
371.8M142013NASA Internet [297]UIUC [38]52464 -> 51855
336.0M150060UW-Milwaukee [7050]Abilene [11537]48601 -> 59454
286.7M150014NASA GSFC [1701]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline
280.7M150027Pennsylvania State U [3999]UNL [7896]UNIDATA LDM
266.1M150010NOAA [6629]Unknown [27446]43957 -> 35228
253.5M142019Nat Lib Med [70]Unknown [40127]50307 -> 36322

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 905.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers36.15% 296.8T 39.74% 451.5G
Encrypted Traffic5.21% 42.79T 5.48% 62.22G
File Sharing2.82% 23.15T 2.77% 31.52G
Misc1.76% 14.42T 3.88% 44.08G
Advanced Apps1.56% 12.82T 1.34% 15.27G
Audio/Video1.34% 10.99T 1.26% 14.31G
Games0.43% 3.534T 0.76% 8.655G
Measurement0.32% 2.649T 0.54% 6.129G
Unidentified50.41% 413.9T 44.22% 502.4G
Total100.00% 821.1T 100.00% 1.136T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
Rsync
FTP
---
32.47%
1.55%
1.18%
0.95%
---
266.6T
12.71T
9.714T
7.789T
---
36.60%
1.22%
0.93%
0.99%
---
415.8G
13.86G
10.59G
11.24G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.69%
1.81%
0.70%
0.01%
0.00%
---
22.11T
14.83T
5.743T
92.47G
6.252G
---
2.56%
2.31%
0.59%
0.01%
0.00%
---
29.12G
26.24G
6.662G
166.0M
27.05M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
Hotline
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
Neo-Modus
WinMX
Blubster
Carracho
Freenet
Direct Connect++
---
1.12%
0.57%
0.54%
0.41%
0.09%
0.06%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.210T
4.698T
4.465T
3.403T
730.6G
465.1G
75.75G
47.66G
23.06G
19.47G
8.410G
3.131G
1.838M
---
0.85%
0.77%
0.64%
0.30%
0.08%
0.09%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.676G
8.731G
7.281G
3.422G
921.4M
1.047G
118.1M
33.55M
44.52M
230.3M
14.63M
4.520M
27.10k
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
Port 0
X11
AFS
IRC
NFS
MS Windows
NTP
Telnet
AOL AIM
IDENT
SOCKS
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
1.02%
0.21%
0.20%
0.18%
0.07%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.351T
1.752T
1.609T
1.464T
580.0G
251.6G
84.41G
59.95G
56.53G
45.97G
45.28G
38.31G
33.02G
28.52G
21.65G
283.2M
21.39M
---
1.87%
1.25%
0.25%
0.16%
0.10%
0.05%
0.03%
0.01%
0.04%
0.05%
0.04%
0.00%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
21.21G
14.24G
2.825G
1.820G
1.152G
569.2M
390.8M
100.9M
426.5M
598.1M
402.1M
47.31M
88.01M
73.72M
116.8M
3.854M
421.7k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
1.45%
0.09%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
11.88T
735.0G
162.6G
25.89G
8.245G
7.318G
---
1.23%
0.08%
0.02%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
---
14.01G
918.1M
184.9M
54.80M
97.39M
7.516M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.88%
0.40%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.245T
3.270T
233.8G
143.3G
66.99G
28.83G
4.393G
1.749G
0.000
---
0.60%
0.60%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.784G
6.844G
368.8M
183.9M
83.76M
37.99M
10.31M
4.505M
0.000
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Spy Arcade
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.28%
0.05%
0.05%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
2.292T
427.5G
395.8G
171.9G
163.5G
53.11G
30.42G
---
0.31%
0.11%
0.28%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
3.504G
1.228G
3.176G
340.9M
240.6M
119.5M
45.67M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.29%
0.03%
0.00%
---
2.376T
272.9G
0.000
---
0.26%
0.28%
0.00%
---
2.959G
3.169G
0.000
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
50.41%
---
413.9T
---
44.22%
---
502.4G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
821.1T
---
100.00%
---
1.136T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.03% 272.9G 0.28% 3.169G
IGMP[2]0.00% 1.034G 0.00% 2.177M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 558.3M 0.00% 3.846M
TCP[6]90.37% 742.0T 86.11% 978.4G
UDP[17]5.89% 48.35T 10.73% 121.9G
IPv6[41]0.00% 21.99G 0.01% 91.29M
GRE[47]2.99% 24.57T 2.26% 25.73G
ESP[50]0.70% 5.743T 0.59% 6.662G
AX.25[93]0.00% 178.8k 0.00% 4.100k
PIM[103]0.00% 3.798G 0.00% 36.45M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 101.4G 0.02% 177.5M
Total100.00% 821.1T 100.00% 1.136T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)42.58% 483.8G
Medium (100-1400B)19.54% 222.0G
Large (1401-1500B)37.26% 423.3G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.61% 6.981G
Total100.00% 1.136T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]97.12% 797.5T 97.32% 1.105T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.33% 2.726T 0.36% 4.118G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 39.45G 0.02% 194.6M
Other2.54% 20.88T 2.30% 26.12G
Total100.00% 821.1T 100.00% 1.136T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.39% 3.169T 0.25% 2.820G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
400002.37% 19.48T 1.49% 16.89G
400011.80% 14.76T 1.12% 12.76G
400021.31% 10.77T 0.83% 9.414G
400030.98% 8.073T 0.62% 7.077G
200000.89% 7.345T 0.59% 6.758G