Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20080128

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20080128 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, data for the following day(s) were missing: Friday. We multiplied all nominal quantities by 7/6 to estimate the amounts of various types of traffic. Percentages and distributions were not modified.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 40.27% of octets and 19.57% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.392M 3 10.06M
5 1.491M 10 10.50M
10 1.621M 18 11.10M
50 3.515M 58 19.95M
90 15.16M 59 65.40M
95 22.64M 59 93.45M
99 45.01M 59 157.2M
99.9 114.2M 59 337.9M
99.99 788.0M 119 847.6M
99.999 1.028G 122 1.276G
100 201.6G 123 3.150G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.26% 570.9M
Medium (100-1400B)6.22% 13.78G
Large (1401-1500B)93.44% 206.8G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.07% 161.7M
Total100.00% 221.3G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers22.22% 71.99T 22.50% 49.81G 29.57% 3.055M
Encrypted Traffic6.72% 21.75T 7.06% 15.62G 5.86% 605.0k
File Sharing3.50% 11.34T 3.54% 7.835G 2.71% 280.2k
Advanced Apps2.33% 7.546T 2.34% 5.169G 3.25% 335.9k
Measurement0.37% 1.206T 0.40% 888.8M 0.21% 21.99k
Misc0.33% 1.084T 0.36% 802.3M 0.68% 70.08k
Games0.20% 642.2G 0.20% 449.3M 0.30% 30.50k
Audio/Video0.12% 399.7G 0.13% 282.1M 0.26% 27.02k
Unidentified64.20% 207.9T 63.47% 140.5G 57.16% 5.904M
Total100.00% 323.9T 100.00% 221.3G 100.00% 10.33M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
299.4M150012Unknown [32361]SWITCH [559]Iperf
205.4M150011NASA GSFC [1701]Unknown [25689]Iperf
184.0M139511NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
174.5M150030NASA Internet [297]Unknown [25689]Iperf
157.1M150012NASA GSFC [1701]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
121.4M140013NASA-GSFC [1749]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
91.79M150060DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]CARIN-AS-BLOCK [7082]Iperf
83.60M150010NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
83.14M142020NASA Internet [297]UIUC [38]Iperf
66.66M150011Merit [237]Abilene [11537]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.048G900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]59674 -> 5101
1.047G900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]48938 -> 5101
840.7M150030Brookhaven National Lab [43]Boston U [111]34267 -> 20000
566.4M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]47840 -> 5101
354.8M150030NASA GSFC [1701]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline
270.4M150012U Chicago [160]SWITCH [559]63007 -> 37736
268.5M150010NOAA [6629]Unknown [27446]58492 -> 48344
259.2M142017NASA Internet [297]UIUC [38]56787 -> 34730
243.0M142024Indiana [87]Argonne [683]Rsync
236.0M148253Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]HHMI [16692]HTTP

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 835.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers37.38% 300.6T 39.90% 451.3G
Encrypted Traffic5.11% 41.12T 5.44% 61.50G
File Sharing3.05% 24.57T 3.07% 34.72G
Misc1.84% 14.78T 4.01% 45.31G
Advanced Apps1.74% 14.00T 1.43% 16.18G
Audio/Video1.50% 12.05T 1.35% 15.28G
Games0.43% 3.485T 0.78% 8.854G
Measurement0.36% 2.920T 0.56% 6.312G
Unidentified48.58% 390.8T 43.46% 491.5G
Total100.00% 804.4T 100.00% 1.131T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
Rsync
FTP
---
33.82%
1.50%
1.07%
0.98%
---
272.0T
12.09T
8.616T
7.890T
---
37.03%
1.18%
0.82%
0.87%
---
418.8G
13.38G
9.328G
9.804G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.98%
1.71%
0.40%
0.01%
0.00%
---
23.97T
13.79T
3.250T
100.9G
5.416G
---
2.80%
2.22%
0.40%
0.02%
0.00%
---
31.61G
25.15G
4.523G
182.6M
25.25M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
Hotline
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Blubster
Carracho
Neo-Modus
Freenet
Direct Connect++
---
1.15%
0.69%
0.58%
0.46%
0.09%
0.06%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.226T
5.522T
4.677T
3.737T
757.0G
518.8G
69.06G
26.67G
19.78G
11.19G
4.598G
1.828G
7.246M
---
0.86%
1.01%
0.64%
0.33%
0.09%
0.11%
0.01%
0.00%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.769G
11.37G
7.261G
3.734G
965.0M
1.194G
111.5M
55.66M
231.9M
17.25M
3.816M
2.553M
33.95k
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
Port 0
X11
AFS
IRC
NFS
Telnet
MS Windows
NTP
IDENT
AOL AIM
SOCKS
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
1.06%
0.22%
0.20%
0.19%
0.08%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.528T
1.757T
1.620T
1.517T
648.2G
240.2G
95.73G
78.48G
55.95G
51.85G
47.55G
45.11G
43.56G
30.10G
22.61G
970.6M
18.12M
---
1.86%
1.31%
0.25%
0.21%
0.11%
0.05%
0.03%
0.01%
0.04%
0.04%
0.05%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
21.09G
14.85G
2.826G
2.325G
1.214G
600.1M
393.9M
119.4M
486.3M
422.2M
619.4M
100.1M
63.64M
63.50M
118.7M
4.097M
413.5k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
1.59%
0.09%
0.05%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
12.81T
730.5G
411.9G
33.71G
11.27G
5.723G
---
1.31%
0.07%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
14.77G
823.3M
414.9M
65.10M
102.3M
8.006M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
1.02%
0.42%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.196T
3.355T
215.3G
160.2G
93.94G
24.62G
5.579G
1.483G
0.000
---
0.68%
0.60%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.746G
6.827G
342.5M
202.6M
113.3M
34.34M
10.38M
3.868M
0.000
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Spy Arcade
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
---
0.28%
0.06%
0.05%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
---
2.229T
457.3G
426.3G
155.0G
128.8G
45.49G
42.88G
---
0.31%
0.11%
0.29%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
---
3.494G
1.283G
3.323G
382.2M
198.4M
60.14M
112.8M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.33%
0.04%
0.00%
---
2.624T
345.4G
0.000
---
0.27%
0.34%
0.00%
---
3.049G
3.806G
0.000
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
48.58%
---
390.8T
---
43.46%
---
491.5G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
804.4T
---
100.00%
---
1.131T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.04% 345.4G 0.34% 3.806G
IGMP[2]0.00% 45.15M 0.00% 1.258M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 579.6M 0.00% 3.936M
TCP[6]90.90% 731.2T 86.15% 974.3G
UDP[17]6.23% 50.12T 11.30% 127.8G
IPv6[41]0.00% 20.86G 0.01% 80.21M
GRE[47]2.41% 19.41T 1.84% 20.77G
ESP[50]0.40% 3.250T 0.40% 4.523G
AX.25[93]0.00% 314.0k 0.00% 7.466k
PIM[103]0.00% 4.445G 0.00% 43.14M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 101.0G 0.02% 183.2M
Total100.00% 804.4T 100.00% 1.131T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)43.03% 486.6G
Medium (100-1400B)19.98% 225.9G
Large (1401-1500B)36.58% 413.7G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.41% 4.675G
Total100.00% 1.131T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.75% 778.3T 96.93% 1.096T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.31% 2.520T 0.33% 3.737G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 45.82G 0.02% 227.9M
Other2.93% 23.54T 2.72% 30.76G
Total100.00% 804.4T 100.00% 1.131T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.47% 3.777T 0.30% 3.416G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
400002.70% 21.75T 1.66% 18.79G
400011.73% 13.93T 1.04% 11.79G
200001.41% 11.37T 0.97% 11.01G
400021.18% 9.512T 0.72% 8.126G
200010.77% 6.232T 0.54% 6.108G