Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20080121

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20080121 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 40.51% of octets and 20.75% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.388M 4 10.05M
5 1.475M 10 10.50M
10 1.582M 18 10.98M
50 3.476M 58 19.35M
90 15.18M 59 63.90M
95 21.65M 59 89.70M
99 41.28M 59 150.9M
99.9 124.4M 75 301.2M
99.99 725.9M 119 941.5M
99.999 1.027G 120 1.326G
100 20.16G 121 7.051G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)2.47% 5.941G
Medium (100-1400B)5.01% 12.08G
Large (1401-1500B)92.44% 222.7G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.08% 184.0M
Total100.00% 240.9G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers20.28% 70.34T 22.30% 53.73G 26.09% 2.942M
Encrypted Traffic4.86% 16.84T 4.85% 11.68G 4.79% 540.1k
File Sharing3.17% 11.00T 3.15% 7.591G 2.63% 297.0k
Advanced Apps2.03% 7.041T 2.00% 4.826G 2.71% 306.1k
Misc0.32% 1.097T 0.36% 875.7M 0.61% 69.12k
Measurement0.31% 1.085T 0.37% 891.2M 0.16% 17.93k
Games0.19% 675.4G 0.20% 471.5M 0.28% 31.17k
Audio/Video0.11% 368.4G 0.11% 257.6M 0.23% 25.57k
Unidentified68.73% 238.3T 66.66% 160.5G 62.49% 7.048M
Total100.00% 346.7T 100.00% 240.9G 100.00% 11.27M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
680.8M150011NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]Abilene [11537]Iperf
424.8M150021UNIVHAWAII [6360]Abilene [11537]Iperf
202.4M150022NASA GSFC [1701]Unknown [25689]Iperf
176.6M139326NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
156.6M150030NASA GSFC [1701]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
146.8M150030NASA Internet [297]Unknown [25689]Iperf
122.0M140311NASA-GSFC [1749]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
92.39M144010Columbia [14]GEORGE-MASON-UNIV [11279]Iperf
86.54M150011Brown U [11078]U Wisconsin [59]Iperf
83.56M150060DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]CARIN-AS-BLOCK [7082]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.046G900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]57632 -> 5101
1.021G900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]52825 -> 5101
1.003G150019INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]ORNL [50]34408 -> 5150
961.9M150030Brookhaven National Lab [43]Boston U [111]55422 -> 20000
592.2M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]42210 -> 5101
404.4M150020NASA GSFC [1701]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline
313.5M150012NOAA [6629]Unknown [27446]46754 -> 37491
250.0M150010Harvard [11]Abilene [11537]33101 -> 3002
245.7M142052Indiana [87]Argonne [683]Rsync
215.5M150060Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]UT-Austin [18]Rsync

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 913.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers33.52% 286.9T 36.77% 426.8G
Encrypted Traffic4.10% 35.08T 4.50% 52.29G
File Sharing2.86% 24.45T 2.83% 32.84G
Misc1.70% 14.52T 3.86% 44.80G
Advanced Apps1.55% 13.26T 1.32% 15.36G
Audio/Video1.49% 12.72T 1.37% 15.91G
Games0.40% 3.435T 0.78% 9.009G
Measurement0.35% 2.987T 0.58% 6.677G
Unidentified54.05% 462.6T 48.00% 557.2G
Total100.00% 856.1T 100.00% 1.161T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
Rsync
FTP
---
30.16%
1.47%
1.09%
0.80%
---
258.1T
12.61T
9.297T
6.837T
---
33.98%
1.20%
0.89%
0.70%
---
394.5G
13.94G
10.35G
8.078G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.34%
1.48%
0.27%
0.01%
0.00%
---
20.02T
12.63T
2.325T
90.46G
5.211G
---
2.19%
2.00%
0.30%
0.01%
0.00%
---
25.39G
23.26G
3.438G
165.3M
23.61M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
Hotline
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
Neo-Modus
WinMX
Blubster
Carracho
Freenet
Direct Connect++
---
1.05%
0.64%
0.54%
0.43%
0.13%
0.05%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.016T
5.473T
4.649T
3.643T
1.096T
415.7G
77.62G
23.70G
23.08G
18.64G
8.220G
3.886G
82.73M
---
0.81%
0.83%
0.64%
0.32%
0.11%
0.09%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.444G
9.686G
7.399G
3.658G
1.244G
991.7M
121.1M
18.05M
49.21M
217.1M
14.36M
4.183M
135.5k
Misc
Mail
Squid
DNS
Port 0
X11
AFS
NFS
IRC
MS Windows
NTP
Telnet
AOL AIM
IDENT
SOCKS
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
0.94%
0.22%
0.20%
0.19%
0.07%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.068T
1.864T
1.721T
1.606T
604.0G
231.6G
94.16G
72.55G
61.61G
47.61G
45.30G
32.15G
29.14G
24.29G
20.45G
247.9M
18.00M
---
1.77%
0.27%
1.24%
0.22%
0.11%
0.06%
0.01%
0.03%
0.04%
0.05%
0.03%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
20.53G
3.188G
14.40G
2.543G
1.221G
687.8M
125.7M
377.0M
413.9M
620.0M
391.6M
46.08M
80.36M
52.19M
102.0M
3.254M
288.2k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
1.43%
0.08%
0.03%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
12.25T
714.6G
243.7G
37.44G
11.30G
3.068G
---
1.22%
0.07%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
14.13G
800.9M
243.7M
68.20M
112.2M
3.536M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
1.08%
0.35%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.204T
3.034T
226.9G
146.4G
87.86G
16.32G
4.308G
2.111G
0.000
---
0.78%
0.53%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.037G
6.198G
338.0M
190.6M
109.7M
24.74M
9.290M
4.525M
0.000
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Spy Arcade
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.26%
0.05%
0.05%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.251T
453.7G
429.4G
134.9G
110.8G
38.23G
17.10G
---
0.34%
0.11%
0.27%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
3.962G
1.232G
3.177G
319.7M
188.6M
96.03M
32.75M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.30%
0.05%
0.00%
---
2.561T
425.9G
0.000
---
0.27%
0.31%
0.00%
---
3.090G
3.587G
0.000
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
54.05%
---
462.6T
---
48.00%
---
557.2G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
856.1T
---
100.00%
---
1.161T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.05% 425.9G 0.31% 3.587G
IGMP[2]0.00% 44.43M 0.00% 1.253M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 580.2M 0.00% 3.967M
TCP[6]89.09% 762.6T 85.03% 987.3G
UDP[17]6.12% 52.35T 10.77% 124.9G
IPv6[41]0.00% 25.16G 0.01% 89.61M
GRE[47]4.46% 38.20T 3.57% 41.43G
ESP[50]0.27% 2.325T 0.30% 3.438G
AX.25[93]0.00% 346.7k 0.00% 7.200k
PIM[103]0.00% 4.371G 0.00% 42.78M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 90.51G 0.01% 165.8M
Total100.00% 856.1T 100.00% 1.161T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)41.51% 481.9G
Medium (100-1400B)19.48% 226.2G
Large (1401-1500B)38.57% 447.8G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.43% 5.045G
Total100.00% 1.161T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]97.18% 831.9T 97.68% 1.134T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.10% 864.7G 0.14% 1.619G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 39.58G 0.02% 208.9M
Other2.72% 23.26T 2.16% 25.05G
Total100.00% 856.1T 100.00% 1.161T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.47% 4.039T 0.32% 3.730G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
400002.27% 19.41T 1.45% 16.88G
400011.93% 16.52T 1.24% 14.39G
400021.72% 14.70T 1.09% 12.66G
200001.23% 10.53T 0.92% 10.68G
400031.23% 10.51T 0.79% 9.122G