Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20080114

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20080114 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 41.29% of octets and 21.10% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.386M 4 10.05M
5 1.471M 11 10.50M
10 1.577M 19 10.95M
50 3.333M 58 19.20M
90 14.42M 59 60.15M
95 21.40M 59 85.95M
99 43.49M 59 156.4M
99.9 128.9M 107 363.1M
99.99 772.0M 119 1.143G
99.999 994.9M 134 3.790G
100 8.307G 135 7.481G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.46% 1.068G
Medium (100-1400B)5.08% 11.83G
Large (1401-1500B)94.35% 219.8G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.11% 256.6M
Total100.00% 233.0G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers19.88% 68.08T 20.24% 47.16G 24.98% 2.829M
Encrypted Traffic6.37% 21.82T 6.48% 15.09G 6.45% 730.7k
File Sharing3.10% 10.62T 3.14% 7.308G 2.60% 294.4k
Advanced Apps2.04% 6.982T 2.06% 4.803G 2.70% 305.5k
Measurement0.46% 1.572T 0.59% 1.383G 0.15% 17.49k
Misc0.28% 943.2G 0.30% 692.2M 0.53% 59.98k
Games0.17% 573.0G 0.17% 399.1M 0.23% 25.54k
Audio/Video0.12% 424.7G 0.13% 300.6M 0.26% 29.12k
Unidentified67.59% 231.5T 66.89% 155.8G 62.11% 7.035M
Total100.00% 342.5T 100.00% 233.0G 100.00% 11.32M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
909.0M150017ESnet-East [291]Boston U [111]Iperf
903.4M871810UNIVHAWAII [6360]Abilene [11537]Iperf
621.6M150060SWITCH [559]PSC [1207]Iperf
299.1M150012Unknown [32361]SWITCH [559]Iperf
206.6M150030NASA GSFC [1701]Unknown [25689]Iperf
205.6M141910LLL-TIS [45]UTAH [17055]Iperf
159.6M150013NASA GSFC [1701]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
153.9M137516NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
146.8M150020NASA Internet [297]Unknown [25689]Iperf
143.3M150017Unknown [32361]UUNET Dual-Homed customers [2852]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.037G900018INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]ORNL [50]44636 -> 5150
1.026G900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]33637 -> 5101
1.023G900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]38084 -> 5101
981.9M150012Brookhaven National Lab [43]Boston U [111]38665 -> 20000
567.0M150045SWITCH [559]PSC [1207]40045 -> 22222
527.5M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]60018 -> 5101
457.2M150032UCLA [52]Oregon State U [4201]49000 -> 1244
380.8M150059UW-Milwaukee [7050]Abilene [11537]47231 -> 55816
341.6M150011NOAA [6629]Unknown [27446]46024 -> 35383
324.7M899159DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]1021 -> 988

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 930.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers33.27% 276.0T 36.44% 402.3G
Encrypted Traffic4.93% 40.89T 5.21% 57.53G
File Sharing2.57% 21.35T 2.48% 27.42G
Misc1.77% 14.69T 4.04% 44.57G
Advanced Apps1.55% 12.85T 1.35% 14.91G
Audio/Video1.51% 12.51T 1.38% 15.22G
Measurement0.71% 5.879T 0.83% 9.128G
Games0.37% 3.083T 0.67% 7.407G
Unidentified53.31% 442.2T 47.61% 525.7G
Total100.00% 829.5T 100.00% 1.104T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
Rsync
FTP
---
29.77%
1.36%
1.27%
0.87%
---
246.9T
11.28T
10.52T
7.248T
---
33.45%
1.13%
1.08%
0.78%
---
369.3G
12.49G
11.91G
8.606G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.89%
1.72%
0.30%
0.01%
0.00%
---
24.01T
14.27T
2.515T
84.56G
5.267G
---
2.59%
2.27%
0.34%
0.01%
0.00%
---
28.55G
25.02G
3.771G
157.2M
24.75M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
BitTorrent
Hotline
Shoutcast
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Neo-Modus
Blubster
Carracho
Freenet
Direct Connect++
---
1.06%
0.49%
0.44%
0.40%
0.12%
0.05%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.767T
4.025T
3.680T
3.357T
985.6G
385.9G
76.34G
22.19G
20.10G
17.05G
9.102G
3.779G
5.304M
---
0.84%
0.61%
0.33%
0.49%
0.10%
0.08%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.231G
6.779G
3.665G
5.368G
1.126G
859.8M
118.6M
38.56M
14.73M
197.6M
14.53M
4.178M
18.10k
Misc
Mail
Port 0
Squid
DNS
X11
AFS
Telnet
IRC
NFS
IDENT
MS Windows
NTP
SOCKS
SNMP
AOL AIM
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
0.93%
0.26%
0.21%
0.21%
0.07%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.737T
2.159T
1.777T
1.702T
582.4G
270.8G
96.40G
85.24G
64.38G
54.83G
54.39G
46.20G
25.42G
20.17G
19.89G
477.3M
25.47M
---
1.82%
0.20%
0.27%
1.37%
0.10%
0.07%
0.04%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.03%
0.05%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
20.14G
2.210G
2.979G
15.12G
1.086G
778.3M
482.3M
395.0M
97.69M
110.5M
385.5M
603.9M
45.24M
100.6M
25.22M
3.642M
403.0k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
1.43%
0.09%
0.03%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
11.84T
733.6G
219.9G
40.95G
11.06G
6.044G
---
1.24%
0.07%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
13.68G
809.2M
219.6M
74.00M
112.9M
6.052M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
1.04%
0.41%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.641T
3.394T
229.4G
138.6G
80.26G
23.99G
2.984G
2.654G
0.000
---
0.73%
0.59%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.008G
6.519G
360.0M
189.0M
105.1M
34.04M
6.920M
6.793M
0.000
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.67%
0.04%
0.00%
---
5.519T
359.9G
0.000
---
0.55%
0.28%
0.00%
---
6.046G
3.081G
0.000
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Spy Arcade
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
---
0.25%
0.05%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.047T
390.6G
341.4G
146.0G
119.4G
25.73G
13.34G
---
0.29%
0.10%
0.24%
0.03%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.156G
1.073G
2.630G
296.7M
178.0M
36.87M
35.47M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
53.31%
---
442.2T
---
47.61%
---
525.7G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
829.5T
---
100.00%
---
1.104T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.04% 359.9G 0.28% 3.081G
IGMP[2]0.00% 45.75M 0.00% 1.287M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 2.315G 0.00% 5.116M
TCP[6]90.59% 751.4T 86.71% 957.5G
UDP[17]5.63% 46.67T 9.94% 109.7G
IPv6[41]0.00% 20.65G 0.01% 76.90M
GRE[47]3.42% 28.39T 2.70% 29.84G
ESP[50]0.30% 2.515T 0.34% 3.771G
AX.25[93]0.00% 326.4k 0.00% 6.500k
PIM[103]0.00% 4.339G 0.00% 43.13M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 84.61G 0.01% 157.8M
Total100.00% 829.5T 100.00% 1.104T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)40.96% 452.3G
Medium (100-1400B)19.41% 214.3G
Large (1401-1500B)39.41% 435.1G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.22% 2.459G
Total100.00% 1.104T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]97.06% 805.1T 97.42% 1.075T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.10% 806.5G 0.14% 1.520G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 35.44G 0.01% 164.7M
Other2.84% 23.57T 2.43% 26.81G
Total100.00% 829.5T 100.00% 1.104T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.50% 4.180T 0.34% 3.762G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
400001.64% 13.58T 1.09% 12.00G
400011.59% 13.20T 1.04% 11.51G
200001.50% 12.44T 1.15% 12.73G
400021.34% 11.08T 0.86% 9.552G
400031.21% 10.01T 0.78% 8.612G