Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20080107

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20080107 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 38.39% of octets and 19.91% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.383M 3 10.05M
5 1.463M 10 10.43M
10 1.560M 18 10.95M
50 3.134M 58 18.15M
90 13.65M 59 53.55M
95 21.82M 59 77.40M
99 50.25M 59 152.7M
99.9 160.0M 117 362.7M
99.99 889.8M 119 1.168G
99.999 1.030G 124 4.684G
100 10.16G 163 7.889G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.38% 722.1M
Medium (100-1400B)5.22% 9.835G
Large (1401-1500B)94.23% 177.4G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.17% 317.3M
Total100.00% 188.3G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers22.13% 61.47T 22.59% 42.55G 26.05% 2.567M
Encrypted Traffic8.05% 22.36T 8.18% 15.39G 6.99% 688.4k
File Sharing3.27% 9.077T 3.32% 6.243G 2.58% 254.0k
Advanced Apps2.74% 7.600T 2.77% 5.223G 3.44% 338.6k
Misc0.42% 1.164T 0.46% 858.7M 0.70% 68.79k
Measurement0.41% 1.140T 0.47% 883.4M 0.15% 14.29k
Games0.20% 544.2G 0.20% 377.3M 0.26% 25.22k
Audio/Video0.13% 366.3G 0.14% 258.2M 0.25% 24.29k
Unidentified62.66% 174.0T 61.88% 116.5G 59.60% 5.873M
Total100.00% 277.7T 100.00% 188.3G 100.00% 9.854M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
897.8M150021UNIVHAWAII [6360]Abilene [11537]Iperf
465.6M129527SWITCH [559]PSC [1207]Iperf
303.3M150011Unknown [32361]SWITCH [559]Iperf
208.6M150013NASA GSFC [1701]Unknown [25689]Iperf
156.8M150030NASA GSFC [1701]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
152.4M150024NASA Internet [297]Unknown [25689]Iperf
144.9M137529NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
143.2M150012Unknown [32361]UUNET Dual-Homed customers [2852]Iperf
143.2M148819NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]ESNET [3428]Iperf
119.0M140926NASA-GSFC [1749]UT-Austin [18]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.176G900051Science, Technology, and Research Transit Access Point [10764]APAN-JP [7660]40002 -> 58561
1.049G900012INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]ORNL [50]44887 -> 5150
1.046G900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]35713 -> 5101
1.046G900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]51171 -> 5101
989.8M150010Brookhaven National Lab [43]Boston U [111]40703 -> 20000
809.8M900021TACCNET [32093]Argonne [683]42014 -> 50001
635.1M150060SWITCH [559]PSC [1207]54170 -> 23232
440.6M150010TACCNET [32093]PSC [1207]42049 -> 50058
434.6M900016NCSA [1224]TACCNET [32093]55563 -> 50000
405.7M896321TACCNET [32093]NCSA [1224]38991 -> 50000

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 807.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers33.97% 245.8T 37.39% 353.6G
Encrypted Traffic5.46% 39.47T 5.66% 53.56G
Audio/Video3.96% 28.62T 1.58% 14.89G
File Sharing2.62% 18.96T 2.63% 24.85G
Misc1.95% 14.14T 4.57% 43.22G
Advanced Apps1.93% 13.94T 1.73% 16.33G
Measurement1.02% 7.347T 1.11% 10.50G
Games0.49% 3.540T 0.67% 6.318G
Unidentified48.60% 351.6T 44.66% 422.4G
Total100.00% 723.5T 100.00% 945.7G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
Rsync
FTP
---
30.07%
1.70%
1.21%
1.00%
---
217.5T
12.30T
8.735T
7.206T
---
34.04%
1.38%
1.06%
0.91%
---
321.8G
13.06G
10.06G
8.615G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.44%
1.66%
0.34%
0.01%
0.00%
---
24.92T
12.01T
2.472T
64.54G
4.837G
---
2.96%
2.30%
0.38%
0.01%
0.00%
---
27.97G
21.79G
3.635G
131.1M
23.62M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
3.45%
0.44%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
24.99T
3.199T
206.3G
113.3G
80.06G
23.33G
4.667G
1.348G
101.2M
---
0.83%
0.68%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.872G
6.394G
333.6M
145.5M
103.8M
32.42M
9.516M
4.518M
74.70k
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
BitTorrent
Shoutcast
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Blubster
Neo-Modus
Freenet
Direct Connect++
---
0.91%
0.54%
0.51%
0.49%
0.11%
0.05%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.574T
3.890T
3.674T
3.548T
790.6G
361.9G
61.98G
28.11G
15.60G
13.32G
3.814G
3.506G
3.694M
---
0.77%
0.40%
0.67%
0.57%
0.10%
0.07%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.257G
3.821G
6.339G
5.433G
970.1M
704.8M
96.86M
51.59M
19.44M
153.9M
2.872M
4.109M
37.10k
Misc
Mail
Port 0
Squid
DNS
X11
AFS
IRC
Telnet
IDENT
MS Windows
NFS
NTP
AOL AIM
SOCKS
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
1.06%
0.27%
0.24%
0.22%
0.06%
0.03%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.699T
1.920T
1.755T
1.599T
415.8G
207.7G
127.1G
118.4G
62.81G
56.95G
49.67G
47.85G
31.69G
30.65G
20.49G
532.0M
23.34M
---
2.15%
0.19%
0.30%
1.51%
0.09%
0.06%
0.05%
0.05%
0.01%
0.04%
0.01%
0.07%
0.00%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
20.36G
1.836G
2.869G
14.30G
827.9M
610.6M
459.7M
487.6M
139.1M
414.5M
78.81M
625.4M
41.33M
48.88M
100.6M
8.133M
481.6k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
1.82%
0.10%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
13.15T
693.7G
65.56G
29.06G
7.263G
1.095G
---
1.59%
0.08%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
15.08G
767.1M
318.5M
57.54M
108.0M
1.688M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.98%
0.04%
0.00%
---
7.085T
262.6G
4.326M
---
0.78%
0.33%
0.00%
---
7.361G
3.144G
2.900k
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Spy Arcade
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
---
0.37%
0.05%
0.03%
0.02%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.652T
346.2G
238.3G
154.3G
124.4G
16.88G
7.768G
---
0.34%
0.09%
0.18%
0.03%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.236G
855.3M
1.694G
290.5M
195.0M
26.43M
19.67M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
48.60%
---
351.6T
---
44.66%
---
422.4G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
723.5T
---
100.00%
---
945.7G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.04% 262.6G 0.33% 3.144G
IGMP[2]0.00% 44.70M 0.00% 1.258M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 8.713G 0.00% 9.295M
TCP[6]87.49% 633.0T 86.57% 818.7G
UDP[17]8.21% 59.43T 9.66% 91.35G
IPv6[41]0.00% 13.39G 0.01% 52.83M
GRE[47]3.91% 28.25T 3.03% 28.65G
ESP[50]0.34% 2.472T 0.38% 3.635G
AX.25[93]0.00% 7.092M 0.00% 12.50k
PIM[103]0.00% 4.079G 0.00% 42.13M
IPMP[169]0.00% 4.326M 0.00% 2.900k
Other0.01% 65.51G 0.01% 132.5M
Total100.00% 723.5T 100.00% 945.7G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)41.55% 392.9G
Medium (100-1400B)19.80% 187.2G
Large (1401-1500B)38.26% 361.8G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.39% 3.686G
Total100.00% 945.7G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.98% 701.7T 97.33% 920.4G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.23% 1.663T 0.21% 2.027G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 37.43G 0.02% 160.6M
Other2.78% 20.12T 2.44% 23.09G
Total100.00% 723.5T 100.00% 945.7G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.42% 3.031T 0.25% 2.378G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
200002.13% 15.39T 1.68% 15.87G
200011.30% 9.430T 1.01% 9.507G
400001.00% 7.247T 0.72% 6.823G
200020.82% 5.954T 0.63% 5.971G
400010.77% 5.561T 0.52% 4.952G