Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20071231

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20071231 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 37.66% of octets and 19.50% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.380M 2 10.05M
5 1.457M 7 10.36M
10 1.549M 15 10.90M
50 3.019M 58 17.25M
90 14.67M 59 49.66M
95 24.45M 59 72.45M
99 60.07M 59 153.4M
99.9 171.2M 118 373.5M
99.99 924.8M 119 1.173G
99.999 1.017G 120 5.351G
100 5.800G 120 7.294G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.34% 442.1M
Medium (100-1400B)5.31% 6.855G
Large (1401-1500B)94.11% 121.4G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.24% 309.0M
Total100.00% 129.0G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers24.62% 47.07T 25.21% 32.54G 26.88% 1.911M
Encrypted Traffic7.97% 15.23T 8.19% 10.56G 6.39% 454.1k
File Sharing4.15% 7.931T 4.23% 5.458G 3.09% 219.4k
Advanced Apps3.81% 7.275T 3.88% 5.004G 4.48% 318.2k
Measurement0.54% 1.028T 0.59% 765.4M 0.22% 15.36k
Misc0.48% 915.3G 0.54% 701.6M 0.77% 54.68k
Games0.20% 373.5G 0.20% 258.0M 0.24% 17.35k
Audio/Video0.13% 242.3G 0.13% 170.9M 0.22% 15.86k
Unidentified58.11% 111.1T 57.03% 73.62G 57.72% 4.104M
Total100.00% 191.1T 100.00% 129.0G 100.00% 7.111M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
195.6M150012NASA GSFC [1701]Unknown [25689]Iperf
160.9M150015NASA GSFC [1701]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
151.9M137527NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
132.2M141111NASA-GSFC [1749]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
114.9M145019Unknown [32361]SWITCH [559]Iperf
96.97M150014NASA Internet [297]Unknown [25689]Iperf
90.76M150060DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]CARIN-AS-BLOCK [7082]Iperf
89.33M150010BWI-GIGA-POP [10886]NIST-BOULDER [2648]Iperf
81.75M150010NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
80.16M150013NASA Internet [297]SLAC [3671]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.149G900019Science, Technology, and Research Transit Access Point [10764]APAN-JP [7660]40002 -> 52508
1.053G900010INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]ORNL [50]54379 -> 5150
1.052G900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]46621 -> 5101
1.031G900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]34195 -> 5101
815.1M900033ORNL [50]Science, Technology, and Research Transit Access Point [10764]50000 -> 47969
370.6M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]54411 -> 5101
355.9M150011NOAA [6629]Unknown [27446]38194 -> 45266
287.0M150015ORNL [50]OSU [159]40003 -> 38917
281.9M150015OSU [159]ORNL [50]40000 -> 36126
277.6M150030NASA GSFC [1701]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 574.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers31.35% 159.1T 33.71% 223.1G
Encrypted Traffic5.52% 28.01T 6.10% 40.40G
Audio/Video5.09% 25.83T 1.79% 11.87G
File Sharing2.86% 14.51T 2.87% 19.01G
Advanced Apps2.62% 13.29T 2.35% 15.56G
Misc2.29% 11.61T 5.81% 38.46G
Measurement0.50% 2.549T 1.47% 9.702G
Games0.39% 1.989T 0.52% 3.465G
Unidentified49.38% 250.6T 45.37% 300.3G
Total100.00% 507.6T 100.00% 661.9G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
Rsync
FTP
---
26.07%
2.24%
1.67%
1.37%
---
132.3T
11.39T
8.475T
6.953T
---
29.35%
1.77%
1.39%
1.20%
---
194.2G
11.70G
9.202G
7.973G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.43%
1.58%
0.50%
0.02%
0.00%
---
17.38T
8.030T
2.514T
78.31G
5.438G
---
3.41%
2.11%
0.56%
0.02%
0.00%
---
22.58G
13.94G
3.696G
148.2M
24.04M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
4.59%
0.43%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
23.31T
2.183T
184.8G
84.85G
48.90G
15.37G
1.659G
1.300G
0.000
---
1.14%
0.58%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.555G
3.830G
270.0M
103.1M
62.81M
20.10M
4.239M
26.40M
0.000
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
BitTorrent
Shoutcast
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Blubster
Carracho
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
0.96%
0.83%
0.49%
0.37%
0.14%
0.05%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.898T
4.197T
2.490T
1.856T
730.4G
258.4G
45.53G
28.40G
4.033G
2.539G
1.542G
290.1M
650.0k
---
0.80%
0.62%
0.68%
0.54%
0.13%
0.07%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.308G
4.123G
4.526G
3.561G
864.0M
463.0M
68.84M
48.67M
46.01M
4.661M
1.870M
540.6k
13.50k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
GsiFTP
BBCP
BBFTP
IBP
---
2.48%
0.13%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
12.57T
677.0G
19.87G
19.29G
6.605G
230.3M
---
2.19%
0.11%
0.01%
0.03%
0.02%
0.00%
---
14.49G
741.3M
40.15M
190.7M
101.1M
751.4k
Misc
Mail
Port 0
Squid
DNS
X11
AFS
Telnet
IRC
NFS
MS Windows
NTP
SOCKS
SNMP
IDENT
AOL AIM
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
1.15%
0.34%
0.32%
0.30%
0.06%
0.04%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.813T
1.714T
1.633T
1.519T
329.1G
205.5G
89.28G
86.49G
47.96G
46.90G
45.67G
37.03G
20.11G
13.44G
12.33G
550.0M
34.27M
---
2.59%
0.24%
0.41%
2.04%
0.12%
0.10%
0.06%
0.05%
0.01%
0.06%
0.09%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
17.12G
1.597G
2.684G
13.50G
815.7M
658.7M
426.6M
357.8M
72.24M
374.0M
598.9M
59.50M
96.35M
61.55M
15.59M
9.336M
513.2k
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.42%
0.08%
0.00%
---
2.140T
409.2G
10.91M
---
0.36%
1.10%
0.00%
---
2.388G
7.313G
7.300k
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Spy Arcade
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
---
0.30%
0.04%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.528T
204.3G
97.36G
87.57G
51.88G
13.04G
6.702G
---
0.30%
0.08%
0.11%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.965G
509.6M
718.1M
152.6M
81.20M
24.44M
13.36M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
49.38%
---
250.6T
---
45.37%
---
300.3G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
507.6T
---
100.00%
---
661.9G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.08% 409.2G 1.10% 7.313G
IGMP[2]0.00% 46.21M 0.00% 1.286M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 283.7M 0.00% 2.444M
TCP[6]84.34% 428.1T 82.98% 549.3G
UDP[17]9.90% 50.27T 11.43% 75.63G
IPv6[41]0.00% 6.280G 0.00% 24.75M
GRE[47]5.17% 26.23T 3.90% 25.79G
ESP[50]0.50% 2.514T 0.56% 3.696G
AX.25[93]0.00% 8.628M 0.00% 13.70k
PIM[103]0.00% 3.906G 0.01% 40.62M
IPMP[169]0.00% 10.91M 0.00% 7.300k
Other0.02% 80.26G 0.02% 150.3M
Total100.00% 507.6T 100.00% 661.9G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)42.44% 280.9G
Medium (100-1400B)19.41% 128.4G
Large (1401-1500B)37.48% 248.0G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.68% 4.509G
Total100.00% 661.9G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.48% 489.7T 96.95% 641.7G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.27% 1.345T 0.25% 1.631G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 28.78G 0.02% 104.9M
Other3.25% 16.51T 2.79% 18.47G
Total100.00% 507.6T 100.00% 661.9G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.66% 3.327T 0.43% 2.857G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
200002.49% 12.65T 1.84% 12.21G
200011.56% 7.936T 1.14% 7.540G
200020.95% 4.817T 0.68% 4.493G
21280.79% 4.028T 0.77% 5.096G
5440.69% 3.480T 0.57% 3.746G