Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20071224

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20071224 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, data for the following day(s) were missing: Sunday. We multiplied all nominal quantities by 7/6 to estimate the amounts of various types of traffic. Percentages and distributions were not modified.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 42.93% of octets and 22.76% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.381M 2 10.05M
5 1.463M 8 10.50M
10 1.563M 19 10.95M
50 2.926M 58 17.85M
90 12.47M 59 48.45M
95 21.87M 59 66.01M
99 57.03M 59 149.1M
99.9 131.4M 118 367.8M
99.99 915.1M 119 1.132G
99.999 1.015G 120 5.118G
100 11.14G 120 7.313G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.31% 416.3M
Medium (100-1400B)4.58% 6.139G
Large (1401-1500B)94.92% 127.1G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.19% 249.5M
Total100.00% 134.0G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers19.97% 39.50T 20.39% 27.32G 21.97% 1.637M
Encrypted Traffic6.20% 12.25T 6.45% 8.643G 4.90% 365.0k
File Sharing3.82% 7.550T 3.89% 5.207G 2.62% 195.1k
Advanced Apps3.57% 7.069T 3.63% 4.857G 4.10% 305.4k
Measurement0.49% 973.0G 0.55% 737.5M 0.13% 9.447k
Misc0.29% 578.4G 0.32% 427.8M 0.46% 34.33k
Games0.15% 292.2G 0.15% 200.4M 0.16% 11.81k
Audio/Video0.11% 214.8G 0.11% 149.6M 0.19% 13.81k
Unidentified65.40% 129.3T 64.51% 86.45G 65.49% 4.883M
Total100.00% 197.8T 100.00% 134.0G 100.00% 7.456M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
198.4M150013NASA GSFC [1701]Unknown [25689]Iperf
157.7M150019NASA GSFC [1701]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
140.5M136511NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
124.6M150019Unknown [32361]SWITCH [559]Iperf
115.4M140130NASA-GSFC [1749]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
106.9M150011NASA Internet [297]Unknown [25689]Iperf
91.10M150011DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]CARIN-AS-BLOCK [7082]Iperf
83.40M150011NASA Internet [297]SLAC [3671]Iperf
77.97M150011NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
69.58M150015Syracuse U [11872]Abilene [11537]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.070G900014INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]ORNL [50]45207 -> 5150
1.024G900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]34124 -> 5101
1.012G900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]42526 -> 5101
355.9M150010NASA GSFC [1701]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline
352.1M150011NOAA [6629]Unknown [27446]47895 -> 36269
346.1M900011Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]38272 -> 5101
293.9M149459Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]U Texas, Arlington [18515]HTTP
262.6M142060Indiana [87]Argonne [683]Rsync
219.3M149950MIT [3]RIT [4385]Rsync
212.4M142025NASA Internet [297]UIUC [38]37565 -> 34412

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 620.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers26.59% 122.5T 28.01% 164.9G
Encrypted Traffic5.06% 23.30T 6.23% 36.66G
Advanced Apps2.87% 13.24T 2.63% 15.45G
File Sharing2.67% 12.29T 2.47% 14.55G
Misc2.35% 10.83T 6.49% 38.22G
Audio/Video1.42% 6.554T 1.39% 8.192G
Measurement0.41% 1.897T 0.92% 5.396G
Games0.27% 1.267T 0.42% 2.474G
Unidentified58.34% 268.8T 51.44% 302.8G
Total100.00% 460.7T 100.00% 588.7G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
FTP
Rsync
---
21.16%
2.27%
1.73%
1.43%
---
97.48T
10.43T
7.979T
6.605T
---
23.46%
1.79%
1.54%
1.22%
---
138.1G
10.56G
9.050G
7.174G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.17%
1.54%
0.33%
0.01%
0.00%
---
14.60T
7.111T
1.541T
33.66G
20.33G
---
3.92%
1.91%
0.37%
0.01%
0.01%
---
23.08G
11.25G
2.204G
83.42M
41.38M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
GsiFTP
BBFTP
BBCP
IBP
---
2.75%
0.12%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
12.65T
563.8G
16.58G
7.157G
2.085G
341.2M
---
2.49%
0.11%
0.01%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
14.67G
641.6M
38.17M
101.4M
4.244M
877.6k
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Blubster
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
0.97%
0.93%
0.33%
0.26%
0.13%
0.04%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.474T
4.285T
1.532T
1.193T
582.1G
172.1G
26.82G
16.70G
8.352G
1.821G
1.438G
63.12M
405.5k
---
0.82%
0.71%
0.51%
0.25%
0.12%
0.04%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.811G
4.202G
3.014G
1.459G
705.5M
258.8M
39.80M
25.56M
11.17M
20.89M
1.640M
337.2k
7.816k
Misc
Mail
Port 0
Squid
DNS
X11
AFS
IRC
MS Windows
NTP
Telnet
NFS
SOCKS
SNMP
IDENT
AOL AIM
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
1.00%
0.49%
0.38%
0.35%
0.05%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.588T
2.262T
1.746T
1.622T
220.8G
132.0G
54.85G
45.62G
45.44G
38.30G
35.46G
22.39G
17.35G
4.455G
1.534G
483.4M
25.55M
---
2.82%
0.32%
0.50%
2.37%
0.09%
0.06%
0.04%
0.09%
0.10%
0.05%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
16.62G
1.894G
2.943G
13.96G
538.0M
371.7M
262.3M
505.0M
596.0M
293.2M
53.07M
38.25M
79.05M
50.71M
4.020M
6.448M
548.5k
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.98%
0.38%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.515T
1.767T
147.5G
61.35G
52.78G
8.005G
1.545G
473.1M
0.000
---
0.86%
0.47%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.047G
2.790G
199.2M
74.60M
63.87M
11.44M
3.575M
1.692M
0.000
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.35%
0.07%
0.00%
---
1.616T
327.4G
16.52M
---
0.31%
0.70%
0.00%
---
1.852G
4.135G
11.02k
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Spy Arcade
Quake
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
---
0.20%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
925.8G
140.7G
82.10G
60.25G
46.36G
9.325G
2.398G
---
0.24%
0.06%
0.08%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.433G
363.3M
496.6M
74.29M
83.20M
18.37M
5.170M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
58.34%
---
268.8T
---
51.44%
---
302.8G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
460.7T
---
100.00%
---
588.7G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.07% 327.4G 0.70% 4.135G
IGMP[2]0.00% 47.72M 0.00% 1.317M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 555.8M 0.00% 3.835M
TCP[6]86.08% 396.6T 82.94% 488.2G
UDP[17]7.02% 32.35T 11.08% 65.24G
IPv6[41]0.00% 5.783G 0.00% 17.16M
GRE[47]6.49% 29.88T 4.98% 29.29G
ESP[50]0.33% 1.541T 0.37% 2.204G
AX.25[93]0.00% 8.616M 0.00% 13.88k
PIM[103]0.00% 3.881G 0.01% 39.92M
IPMP[169]0.00% 16.52M 0.00% 11.02k
Other0.01% 36.51G 0.01% 86.70M
Total100.00% 460.7T 100.00% 588.7G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)40.60% 239.0G
Medium (100-1400B)18.63% 109.6G
Large (1401-1500B)40.15% 236.3G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.62% 3.637G
Total100.00% 588.7G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.72% 445.6T 96.93% 570.6G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.16% 744.9G 0.18% 1.079G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 14.25G 0.01% 67.46M
Other3.12% 14.36T 2.88% 16.94G
Total100.00% 460.7T 100.00% 588.7G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.65% 3.015T 0.50% 2.937G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
200003.68% 16.93T 2.77% 16.32G
200012.54% 11.72T 1.93% 11.38G
200021.48% 6.800T 1.14% 6.685G
200030.78% 3.601T 0.58% 3.437G
41730.78% 3.578T 0.08% 480.7M