Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20071217

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20071217 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 37.86% of octets and 19.67% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.384M 2 10.05M
5 1.470M 7 10.50M
10 1.575M 16 10.95M
50 3.039M 58 17.85M
90 14.14M 59 48.28M
95 21.68M 59 68.40M
99 58.44M 59 152.5M
99.9 125.1M 118 364.5M
99.99 889.6M 119 1.139G
99.999 1.008G 120 4.753G
100 41.40G 122 8.963G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.41% 692.5M
Medium (100-1400B)5.46% 9.266G
Large (1401-1500B)93.94% 159.3G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.19% 321.2M
Total100.00% 169.6G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers23.76% 59.27T 24.24% 41.12G 25.60% 2.390M
Encrypted Traffic6.84% 17.07T 7.02% 11.90G 5.69% 531.0k
File Sharing3.76% 9.393T 3.82% 6.488G 2.87% 268.0k
Advanced Apps2.80% 6.976T 2.83% 4.799G 3.25% 303.0k
Misc0.44% 1.099T 0.48% 817.7M 0.70% 65.36k
Measurement0.41% 1.012T 0.48% 807.2M 0.14% 12.79k
Games0.22% 536.5G 0.22% 374.2M 0.24% 22.40k
Audio/Video0.13% 330.2G 0.14% 232.3M 0.25% 22.90k
Unidentified61.65% 153.8T 60.77% 103.0G 61.28% 5.722M
Total100.00% 249.5T 100.00% 169.6G 100.00% 9.338M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
286.7M150014Unknown [32361]SWITCH [559]Iperf
246.8M142010LLL-TIS [45]UTAH [17055]Iperf
197.1M150011NASA GSFC [1701]Unknown [25689]Iperf
157.4M150016NASA GSFC [1701]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
147.6M137726NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
125.0M150024NASA Internet [297]Unknown [25689]Iperf
123.8M140726NASA-GSFC [1749]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
85.37M150060DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]CARIN-AS-BLOCK [7082]Iperf
82.15M150010NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
80.66M150017NASA Internet [297]SLAC [3671]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.208G900059Science, Technology, and Research Transit Access Point [10764]APAN-JP [7660]34534 -> 40002
1.053G900015INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]ORNL [50]33619 -> 5150
1.029G900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]39849 -> 5101
1.015G900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]40000 -> 5101
766.6M900011ORNL [50]Science, Technology, and Research Transit Access Point [10764]40002 -> 37639
728.3M150014SDSC [195]TACCNET [32093]55377 -> 50000
660.9M900060DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]1021 -> 988
343.7M150014NASA GSFC [1701]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline
339.7M150011NOAA [6629]Unknown [27446]38070 -> 34174
335.4M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]36319 -> 5101

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 765.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers33.06% 217.8T 36.10% 311.3G
Encrypted Traffic5.00% 32.93T 5.47% 47.13G
File Sharing2.61% 17.18T 2.54% 21.87G
Misc2.19% 14.40T 5.17% 44.61G
Audio/Video2.18% 14.36T 1.44% 12.41G
Advanced Apps2.05% 13.49T 1.83% 15.75G
Measurement0.39% 2.591T 0.90% 7.744G
Games0.36% 2.392T 0.55% 4.783G
Unidentified52.17% 343.8T 46.01% 396.7G
Total100.00% 659.0T 100.00% 862.4G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
Rsync
FTP
---
28.45%
1.84%
1.65%
1.11%
---
187.4T
12.15T
10.87T
7.337T
---
32.31%
1.50%
1.30%
0.99%
---
278.6G
12.91G
11.17G
8.560G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.94%
1.74%
0.31%
0.01%
0.00%
---
19.35T
11.44T
2.057T
74.01G
6.647G
---
2.82%
2.25%
0.37%
0.01%
0.00%
---
24.34G
19.44G
3.212G
113.7M
26.71M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
BitTorrent
Shoutcast
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Blubster
Carracho
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.08%
0.62%
0.40%
0.33%
0.12%
0.05%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.096T
4.097T
2.618T
2.195T
770.5G
315.2G
53.92G
18.73G
5.670G
5.471G
2.557G
528.3M
191.8M
---
0.90%
0.47%
0.49%
0.48%
0.11%
0.07%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.727G
4.020G
4.206G
4.132G
975.7M
624.0M
81.42M
29.92M
66.54M
8.541M
3.112M
676.8k
238.9k
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
Port 0
X11
AFS
Telnet
IRC
MS Windows
NFS
NTP
SOCKS
IDENT
SNMP
AOL AIM
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
1.23%
0.26%
0.26%
0.26%
0.07%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.101T
1.743T
1.726T
1.712T
453.7G
229.0G
101.6G
86.32G
54.90G
54.26G
48.25G
33.98G
24.21G
19.92G
14.27G
939.0M
23.97M
---
2.52%
1.72%
0.33%
0.18%
0.10%
0.05%
0.05%
0.04%
0.05%
0.01%
0.07%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
21.74G
14.87G
2.857G
1.581G
872.7M
469.3M
395.9M
356.1M
461.8M
113.4M
631.4M
51.16M
69.36M
102.4M
18.19M
16.08M
433.4k
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
1.63%
0.49%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.74T
3.220T
233.0G
102.5G
51.27G
12.29G
2.503G
954.6M
153.9M
---
0.71%
0.66%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.155G
5.694G
344.2M
119.2M
69.78M
19.00M
5.319M
2.617M
113.5k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
1.94%
0.09%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
12.81T
575.0G
60.62G
32.47G
8.462G
1.612G
---
1.72%
0.08%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
14.85G
670.9M
62.44M
68.30M
102.3M
2.547M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.34%
0.06%
0.00%
---
2.220T
370.8G
12.57M
---
0.29%
0.60%
0.00%
---
2.529G
5.215G
11.80k
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Spy Arcade
Half-Life
Quake
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
---
0.23%
0.04%
0.03%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
1.543T
284.7G
224.8G
194.7G
86.23G
41.86G
17.20G
---
0.25%
0.08%
0.03%
0.16%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
2.193G
712.5M
275.8M
1.371G
155.1M
54.33M
20.39M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
52.17%
---
343.8T
---
46.01%
---
396.7G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
659.0T
---
100.00%
---
862.4G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.06% 370.8G 0.60% 5.215G
IGMP[2]0.00% 46.16M 0.00% 1.288M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 249.6M 0.00% 2.301M
TCP[6]87.45% 576.3T 85.65% 738.6G
UDP[17]6.93% 45.67T 9.35% 80.63G
IPv6[41]0.00% 11.73G 0.00% 30.50M
GRE[47]5.24% 34.54T 4.00% 34.52G
ESP[50]0.31% 2.057T 0.37% 3.212G
AX.25[93]0.00% 10.36M 0.00% 17.50k
PIM[103]0.00% 4.149G 0.00% 41.32M
IPMP[169]0.00% 12.57M 0.00% 11.80k
Other0.01% 76.80G 0.01% 116.8M
Total100.00% 659.0T 100.00% 862.4G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)41.31% 356.2G
Medium (100-1400B)19.08% 164.5G
Large (1401-1500B)39.32% 339.1G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.29% 2.464G
Total100.00% 862.4G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.89% 638.5T 96.99% 836.4G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.40% 2.637T 0.36% 3.144G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 53.66G 0.02% 155.9M
Other2.70% 17.78T 2.63% 22.69G
Total100.00% 659.0T 100.00% 862.4G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.47% 3.082T 0.34% 2.939G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
200004.79% 31.56T 3.44% 29.65G
200013.08% 20.29T 2.25% 19.41G
200021.86% 12.26T 1.37% 11.81G
200031.10% 7.241T 0.81% 6.991G
19350.70% 4.590T 0.84% 7.221G