Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20071210

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20071210 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 33.87% of octets and 16.37% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.386M 3 10.05M
5 1.472M 8 10.50M
10 1.578M 17 10.95M
50 2.999M 58 17.60M
90 13.51M 59 46.80M
95 21.20M 59 68.40M
99 51.15M 59 152.1M
99.9 122.4M 106 319.2M
99.99 892.2M 119 1.126G
99.999 1.032G 126 4.999G
100 24.00G 168 19.50G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.38% 661.2M
Medium (100-1400B)7.23% 12.69G
Large (1401-1500B)92.20% 161.9G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.19% 342.2M
Total100.00% 175.6G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers26.04% 67.03T 26.38% 46.35G 28.57% 2.781M
Encrypted Traffic8.10% 20.86T 8.39% 14.74G 6.27% 610.7k
File Sharing3.68% 9.481T 3.74% 6.573G 3.00% 291.7k
Advanced Apps2.58% 6.640T 2.60% 4.564G 3.10% 302.2k
Measurement0.47% 1.204T 0.48% 851.6M 0.12% 12.05k
Misc0.46% 1.178T 0.49% 865.6M 0.71% 68.77k
Games0.27% 690.4G 0.27% 479.3M 0.33% 32.26k
Audio/Video0.24% 613.2G 0.24% 429.6M 0.47% 45.81k
Unidentified58.17% 149.7T 57.39% 100.8G 57.42% 5.589M
Total100.00% 257.4T 100.00% 175.6G 100.00% 9.734M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
5.077G900025U Chicago [160]Unknown [32361]Iperf
689.9M900055Unknown [32361]U Chicago [160]Iperf
424.4M150013NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]ESNET [3428]Iperf
199.6M150030NASA GSFC [1701]Unknown [25689]Iperf
190.3M150019Unknown [32361]SWITCH [559]Iperf
157.4M150021NASA GSFC [1701]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
152.8M150018NASA Internet [297]Unknown [25689]Iperf
151.5M137515NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
146.5M149620NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]ESNET [3428]Iperf
133.8M139515NASA-GSFC [1749]UT-Austin [18]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.049G900012INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]ORNL [50]Audiogalaxy
1.040G900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]48512 -> 5101
1.033G900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]57377 -> 5101
732.0M900060DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]1021 -> 988
459.7M149727SWITCH [559]PSC [1207]47905 -> 23232
454.9M900011Science, Technology, and Research Transit Access Point [10764]APAN-JP [7660]56900 -> 47208
440.6M142012NASA Internet [297]UIUC [38]59028 -> 36286
368.1M900013ORNL [50]Science, Technology, and Research Transit Access Point [10764]45701 -> 50500
366.5M150010NOAA [6629]Unknown [27446]50194 -> 39860
297.1M150012NASA GSFC [1701]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 799.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers39.11% 297.3T 41.44% 444.6G
Encrypted Traffic5.10% 38.80T 5.24% 56.17G
File Sharing2.63% 20.01T 2.56% 27.49G
Misc2.02% 15.37T 4.38% 46.95G
Advanced Apps1.77% 13.42T 1.52% 16.27G
Audio/Video1.28% 9.697T 1.20% 12.88G
Games0.45% 3.388T 0.76% 8.131G
Measurement0.43% 3.301T 0.95% 10.20G
Unidentified47.21% 358.8T 41.96% 450.1G
Total100.00% 760.2T 100.00% 1.072T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
Rsync
FTP
---
35.08%
1.73%
1.18%
1.13%
---
266.6T
13.13T
8.947T
8.615T
---
38.24%
1.35%
0.95%
0.91%
---
410.2G
14.50G
10.17G
9.733G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.04%
1.77%
0.28%
0.01%
0.00%
---
23.09T
13.49T
2.147T
51.78G
26.39G
---
2.67%
2.25%
0.30%
0.01%
0.00%
---
28.63G
24.19G
3.199G
104.7M
40.87M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
BitTorrent
Hotline
Shoutcast
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Blubster
Carracho
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
0.99%
0.61%
0.52%
0.29%
0.12%
0.07%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.523T
4.655T
3.947T
2.241T
938.3G
550.3G
78.59G
48.50G
18.22G
8.255G
1.767G
1.246G
50.44M
---
0.79%
0.74%
0.36%
0.40%
0.12%
0.11%
0.01%
0.01%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.453G
7.962G
3.881G
4.266G
1.258G
1.223G
121.6M
95.28M
211.5M
12.32M
2.600M
2.659M
87.10k
Misc
Mail
Port 0
DNS
Squid
X11
AFS
IRC
MS Windows
NFS
Telnet
NTP
IDENT
SOCKS
AOL AIM
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
1.11%
0.30%
0.24%
0.22%
0.07%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.419T
2.249T
1.822T
1.671T
504.1G
254.6G
89.52G
79.17G
62.13G
60.99G
51.48G
35.03G
27.25G
26.53G
21.56G
843.6M
20.17M
---
2.08%
0.21%
1.43%
0.26%
0.09%
0.06%
0.04%
0.07%
0.01%
0.05%
0.06%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
22.34G
2.205G
15.37G
2.808G
974.9M
599.0M
383.5M
698.9M
103.3M
502.4M
655.1M
95.69M
45.74M
37.43M
115.7M
5.050M
406.4k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
1.66%
0.07%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
12.65T
549.7G
166.2G
33.74G
12.91G
2.661G
---
1.36%
0.06%
0.08%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
14.63G
616.9M
849.4M
69.34M
99.27M
5.003M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.68%
0.51%
0.06%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.168T
3.855T
419.9G
157.9G
62.28G
29.29G
3.081G
1.111G
0.000
---
0.50%
0.62%
0.05%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.415G
6.623G
508.1M
199.4M
79.92M
43.18M
7.737M
4.206M
0.000
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Spy Arcade
Quake
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
---
0.28%
0.05%
0.05%
0.04%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.096T
409.4G
379.1G
298.1G
150.4G
31.99G
23.31G
---
0.30%
0.11%
0.27%
0.04%
0.03%
0.00%
0.01%
---
3.229G
1.177G
2.909G
401.2M
306.8M
48.14M
59.02M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.38%
0.05%
0.00%
---
2.886T
415.0G
0.000
---
0.28%
0.67%
0.00%
---
2.983G
7.216G
0.000
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
47.21%
---
358.8T
---
41.96%
---
450.1G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
760.2T
---
100.00%
---
1.072T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.05% 415.0G 0.67% 7.216G
IGMP[2]0.00% 43.55M 0.00% 1.236M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 22.48G 0.02% 254.8M
TCP[6]91.01% 691.8T 87.29% 936.5G
UDP[17]5.18% 39.35T 9.14% 98.12G
IPv6[41]0.00% 10.68G 0.00% 44.07M
GRE[47]3.47% 26.35T 2.54% 27.29G
ESP[50]0.28% 2.147T 0.30% 3.199G
AX.25[93]0.00% 339.0k 0.00% 6.900k
PIM[103]0.00% 4.258G 0.00% 41.68M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 58.62G 0.02% 182.6M
Total100.00% 760.2T 100.00% 1.072T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)43.62% 468.0G
Medium (100-1400B)20.35% 218.3G
Large (1401-1500B)35.89% 385.1G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.13% 1.429G
Total100.00% 1.072T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.35% 732.5T 96.72% 1.037T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.56% 4.280T 0.46% 4.959G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 47.75G 0.02% 224.8M
Other3.08% 23.40T 2.80% 30.04G
Total100.00% 760.2T 100.00% 1.072T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.49% 3.756T 0.32% 3.415G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
200003.76% 28.54T 2.53% 27.12G
200012.55% 19.38T 1.74% 18.64G
200021.71% 13.02T 1.17% 12.50G
200031.17% 8.866T 0.79% 8.502G
200040.85% 6.477T 0.57% 6.100G