Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20071203

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20071203 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 34.14% of octets and 15.75% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.386M 3 10.05M
5 1.469M 12 10.43M
10 1.569M 21 10.94M
50 2.925M 58 17.70M
90 10.41M 59 45.30M
95 16.80M 59 63.60M
99 45.73M 59 136.2M
99.9 112.8M 115 339.1M
99.99 859.1M 119 1.136G
99.999 1.016G 122 4.327G
100 244.8G 122 16.45G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.37% 593.9M
Medium (100-1400B)7.61% 12.09G
Large (1401-1500B)91.83% 145.9G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.18% 293.3M
Total100.00% 158.9G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers29.93% 69.66T 30.23% 48.03G 32.58% 2.954M
Encrypted Traffic7.66% 17.83T 7.80% 12.40G 6.50% 589.8k
File Sharing3.82% 8.901T 3.94% 6.253G 3.00% 271.9k
Advanced Apps2.26% 5.250T 2.27% 3.603G 2.54% 230.7k
Measurement1.26% 2.921T 1.20% 1.908G 0.19% 17.34k
Misc0.53% 1.243T 0.57% 913.2M 0.86% 78.06k
Games0.34% 800.8G 0.35% 558.5M 0.40% 36.68k
Audio/Video0.30% 696.0G 0.31% 490.8M 0.58% 52.32k
Unidentified53.90% 125.4T 53.33% 84.75G 53.34% 4.837M
Total100.00% 232.7T 100.00% 158.9G 100.00% 9.069M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
2.203G900060INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]U Chicago [160]Iperf
1.841G900059APAN-JP [7660]Science, Technology, and Research Transit Access Point [10764]Iperf
952.6M150014LBL [16]Abilene [11537]Iperf
892.3M150030ESnet-East [291]Boston U [111]Iperf
477.1M135126SWITCH [559]PSC [1207]Iperf
305.3M150060PUNET Technology Ltd.,Taiwan [9270]PUNET Technology Ltd.,Taiwan [10052]Iperf
202.5M150010NASA GSFC [1701]Unknown [25689]Iperf
176.4M150010Indiana [87]Abilene [11537]Iperf
167.4M900013AMES-NAS [24]NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Iperf
165.5M150011NASA GSFC [1701]UT-Austin [18]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.035G900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]53484 -> 5101
1.034G900011INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]ORNL [50]51938 -> 5150
1.005G900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]Audiogalaxy
875.9M150011LBL [16]Abilene [11537]39041 -> 55566
655.2M147724SWITCH [559]PSC [1207]23232 -> 54247
602.1M900011Science, Technology, and Research Transit Access Point [10764]APAN-JP [7660]47371 -> 35000
484.4M150013INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]LATECH [19564]64001 -> 50002
343.3M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]34425 -> 5101
301.3M150020NASA GSFC [1701]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline
269.4M150030MIT [3]RIT [4385]Rsync

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 757.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers42.95% 292.7T 44.74% 451.4G
Encrypted Traffic4.81% 32.82T 4.81% 48.57G
File Sharing2.75% 18.74T 2.83% 28.56G
Misc2.19% 14.93T 4.19% 42.29G
Audio/Video1.39% 9.450T 1.28% 12.92G
Advanced Apps1.33% 9.050T 1.08% 10.90G
Measurement0.78% 5.321T 0.89% 9.007G
Games0.50% 3.381T 0.81% 8.166G
Unidentified43.31% 295.2T 39.36% 397.1G
Total100.00% 681.7T 100.00% 1.009T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
Rsync
FTP
---
38.84%
1.82%
1.22%
1.06%
---
264.7T
12.39T
8.331T
7.259T
---
41.60%
1.36%
0.90%
0.87%
---
419.7G
13.73G
9.117G
8.808G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.53%
2.00%
0.27%
0.01%
0.00%
---
17.27T
13.64T
1.837T
65.00G
8.011G
---
2.12%
2.41%
0.27%
0.01%
0.00%
---
21.37G
24.32G
2.720G
127.4M
27.19M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
BitTorrent
Hotline
Shoutcast
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Blubster
Freenet
Carracho
Direct Connect++
Neo-Modus
---
0.86%
0.79%
0.48%
0.35%
0.15%
0.10%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.848T
5.370T
3.300T
2.386T
1.048T
659.0G
65.39G
27.37G
20.68G
6.913G
6.586G
850.4M
384.7M
---
0.67%
1.05%
0.32%
0.46%
0.14%
0.14%
0.01%
0.01%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.806G
10.62G
3.249G
4.626G
1.388G
1.442G
112.0M
58.27M
241.9M
7.766M
12.67M
934.9k
896.7k
Misc
Mail
Port 0
DNS
Squid
X11
AFS
Telnet
IRC
NFS
MS Windows
NTP
IDENT
SOCKS
AOL AIM
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
1.19%
0.32%
0.23%
0.22%
0.08%
0.04%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.100T
2.159T
1.589T
1.523T
560.8G
301.0G
293.6G
110.4G
63.51G
58.68G
43.68G
42.94G
37.12G
30.91G
16.72G
332.9M
25.82M
---
2.02%
0.21%
1.28%
0.25%
0.10%
0.08%
0.06%
0.04%
0.01%
0.05%
0.06%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
20.40G
2.164G
12.92G
2.571G
974.1M
803.1M
608.8M
401.5M
99.97M
464.7M
559.3M
93.27M
64.64M
60.57M
86.31M
3.188M
451.2k
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.69%
0.59%
0.06%
0.02%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.722T
4.007T
430.8G
163.2G
102.3G
18.11G
3.161G
2.608G
0.000
---
0.49%
0.70%
0.05%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.976G
7.041G
523.7M
205.1M
132.6M
31.47M
7.191M
6.099M
0.000
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
1.26%
0.05%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.610T
335.6G
46.34G
31.85G
23.77G
1.853G
---
0.99%
0.04%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
9.981G
366.6M
380.7M
72.00M
95.86M
3.449M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.71%
0.07%
0.00%
---
4.846T
474.8G
0.000
---
0.38%
0.51%
0.00%
---
3.869G
5.138G
0.000
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Spy Arcade
Quake
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
---
0.31%
0.06%
0.06%
0.04%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.137T
397.4G
380.0G
295.1G
117.0G
34.04G
21.06G
---
0.33%
0.11%
0.29%
0.04%
0.03%
0.00%
0.01%
---
3.338G
1.132G
2.936G
376.4M
277.3M
49.14M
56.05M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
43.31%
---
295.2T
---
39.36%
---
397.1G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
681.7T
---
100.00%
---
1.009T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.07% 474.8G 0.51% 5.138G
IGMP[2]0.00% 37.38M 0.00% 1.054M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 18.22G 0.02% 187.4M
TCP[6]91.39% 623.0T 87.91% 887.0G
UDP[17]5.63% 38.36T 9.39% 94.70G
IPv6[41]0.00% 11.60G 0.00% 49.77M
GRE[47]2.63% 17.90T 1.88% 18.98G
ESP[50]0.27% 1.837T 0.27% 2.720G
AX.25[93]0.00% 315.4k 0.00% 6.300k
PIM[103]0.00% 3.540G 0.00% 35.22M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 66.48G 0.02% 153.9M
Total100.00% 681.7T 100.00% 1.009T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)45.43% 458.4G
Medium (100-1400B)20.52% 207.0G
Large (1401-1500B)33.89% 341.9G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.15% 1.521G
Total100.00% 1.009T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.65% 658.9T 96.68% 975.5G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.73% 4.951T 0.62% 6.264G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 42.11G 0.02% 176.6M
Other2.62% 17.85T 2.68% 27.06G
Total100.00% 681.7T 100.00% 1.009T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.44% 2.969T 0.28% 2.786G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
200002.31% 15.75T 1.55% 15.61G
200011.27% 8.652T 0.88% 8.918G
19350.93% 6.344T 1.01% 10.18G
163840.89% 6.066T 0.66% 6.641G
200020.79% 5.414T 0.56% 5.628G