Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20071126

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20071126 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, data for the following day(s) were missing: Monday. We multiplied all nominal quantities by 7/6 to estimate the amounts of various types of traffic. Percentages and distributions were not modified.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 29.23% of octets and 13.42% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.386M 3 10.05M
5 1.468M 11 10.41M
10 1.570M 20 10.93M
50 2.863M 58 17.40M
90 10.90M 59 43.50M
95 18.02M 59 63.45M
99 44.41M 59 142.4M
99.9 97.85M 114 311.5M
99.99 604.4M 119 821.5M
99.999 993.7M 119 2.217G
100 180.0G 120 7.065G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.64% 1.018G
Medium (100-1400B)7.05% 11.25G
Large (1401-1500B)92.20% 147.1G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.11% 181.0M
Total100.00% 159.6G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers28.58% 66.38T 28.87% 46.09G 32.63% 3.013M
Encrypted Traffic7.78% 18.06T 7.87% 12.56G 5.86% 541.4k
File Sharing3.79% 8.815T 3.83% 6.122G 2.96% 272.9k
Advanced Apps2.48% 5.753T 2.47% 3.947G 2.93% 270.1k
Measurement0.49% 1.145T 0.57% 914.8M 0.17% 16.14k
Misc0.45% 1.042T 0.48% 760.0M 0.73% 67.24k
Audio/Video0.32% 734.0G 0.32% 510.7M 0.60% 55.18k
Games0.29% 664.4G 0.30% 475.4M 0.35% 32.36k
Unidentified55.83% 129.7T 55.28% 88.25G 53.78% 4.966M
Total100.00% 232.3T 100.00% 159.6G 100.00% 9.235M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
642.5M899627U Chicago [160]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf
388.7M150010Indiana [87]Abilene [11537]Iperf
283.7M150011U Minnesota [217]UIUC [38]Iperf
162.2M150015NASA GSFC [1701]Unknown [25689]Iperf
157.0M150030NASA GSFC [1701]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
146.8M150013Unknown [32361]UUNET Dual-Homed customers [2852]Iperf
140.8M138025NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
135.6M140614NASA-GSFC [1749]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
104.4M150010APNIC [7539]UUNET Dual-Homed customers [2852]Iperf
100.4M150020NASA Internet [297]Unknown [25689]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.030G900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]50774 -> 5101
1.019G900021INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]ORNL [50]60098 -> 5150
1.005G900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]32874 -> 5101
501.7M150013INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]LATECH [19564]64016 -> 50002
422.0M129325SWITCH [559]PSC [1207]23232 -> 55545
344.7M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]53239 -> 5101
332.6M150026UCLA [52]Oregon State U [4201]49000 -> 1202
305.2M150030NASA GSFC [1701]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline
251.7M150033Oregon State U [4201]UCLA [52]1074 -> 49000
246.4M150011MIT [3]RIT [4385]Rsync

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 767.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers39.84% 316.5T 41.24% 490.3G
Encrypted Traffic4.61% 36.64T 4.71% 56.05G
File Sharing2.81% 22.32T 2.85% 33.91G
Audio/Video2.51% 19.91T 1.43% 17.05G
Misc2.08% 16.50T 3.99% 47.43G
Advanced Apps1.48% 11.74T 1.13% 13.41G
Games0.46% 3.690T 0.78% 9.265G
Measurement0.42% 3.364T 0.53% 6.338G
Unidentified45.79% 363.9T 43.33% 515.3G
Total100.00% 794.6T 100.00% 1.189T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
FTP
Rsync
---
35.79%
2.12%
1.01%
0.92%
---
284.4T
16.86T
8.031T
7.288T
---
38.24%
1.51%
0.81%
0.67%
---
454.7G
17.97G
9.647G
7.992G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.53%
1.79%
0.27%
0.02%
0.00%
---
20.07T
14.20T
2.176T
177.7G
6.858G
---
2.26%
2.17%
0.27%
0.02%
0.00%
---
26.82G
25.78G
3.209G
215.4M
26.39M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
BitTorrent
Hotline
Shoutcast
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Blubster
Carracho
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
0.93%
0.76%
0.47%
0.36%
0.16%
0.10%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.378T
6.052T
3.746T
2.882T
1.285T
815.9G
86.96G
35.97G
25.10G
13.54G
3.450G
1.072G
647.3M
---
0.73%
1.05%
0.31%
0.45%
0.13%
0.14%
0.01%
0.01%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.728G
12.44G
3.697G
5.296G
1.538G
1.677G
135.2M
66.34M
292.3M
23.02M
4.456M
1.813M
480.9k
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
1.84%
0.57%
0.06%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
14.61T
4.535T
498.1G
174.6G
65.94G
23.10G
5.121G
1.636G
0.000
---
0.71%
0.65%
0.05%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.383G
7.720G
587.0M
222.9M
93.02M
36.08M
11.77M
4.566M
0.000
Misc
Mail
Port 0
DNS
Squid
X11
AFS
IRC
Telnet
NFS
MS Windows
NTP
AOL AIM
SOCKS
IDENT
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
1.07%
0.38%
0.23%
0.22%
0.08%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.510T
2.986T
1.825T
1.711T
623.8G
321.1G
141.0G
86.83G
61.37G
59.91G
48.85G
39.94G
37.35G
31.28G
16.57G
610.7M
23.48M
---
1.86%
0.25%
1.27%
0.24%
0.09%
0.07%
0.04%
0.03%
0.01%
0.04%
0.05%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
22.17G
2.925G
15.12G
2.853G
1.097G
806.0M
488.2M
389.0M
99.46M
464.6M
632.0M
126.1M
62.89M
102.1M
76.74M
3.485M
415.5k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
IBP
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
---
1.35%
0.07%
0.05%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.70T
527.2G
402.1G
63.95G
36.36G
12.52G
---
1.02%
0.04%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
---
12.14G
518.7M
484.5M
86.60M
76.17M
104.6M
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Spy Arcade
Quake
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
---
0.30%
0.05%
0.05%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
2.414T
427.8G
421.3G
207.0G
150.5G
41.87G
27.63G
---
0.32%
0.11%
0.28%
0.03%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
---
3.771G
1.348G
3.379G
306.0M
330.4M
59.85M
70.09M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.38%
0.05%
0.00%
---
3.055T
359.9G
0.000
---
0.28%
0.29%
0.00%
---
3.354G
3.480G
0.000
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
45.79%
---
363.9T
---
43.33%
---
515.3G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
794.6T
---
100.00%
---
1.189T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.05% 359.9G 0.29% 3.480G
IGMP[2]0.00% 44.25M 0.00% 1.243M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 20.60G 0.02% 185.7M
TCP[6]88.78% 705.5T 84.89% 1.009T
UDP[17]6.95% 55.24T 12.06% 143.3G
IPv6[41]0.00% 23.20G 0.01% 80.60M
GRE[47]3.93% 31.22T 2.49% 29.59G
ESP[50]0.27% 2.176T 0.27% 3.209G
AX.25[93]0.00% 306.7k 0.00% 6.416k
PIM[103]0.00% 4.236G 0.00% 42.97M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.02% 181.5G 0.02% 254.5M
Total100.00% 794.6T 100.00% 1.189T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)46.17% 549.0G
Medium (100-1400B)20.79% 247.1G
Large (1401-1500B)32.54% 386.9G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.51% 6.022G
Total100.00% 1.189T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.50% 766.8T 96.37% 1.146T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.74% 5.863T 0.75% 8.951G
EF [DSCP=46]0.12% 988.7G 0.08% 894.7M
Other2.64% 20.99T 2.80% 33.31G
Total100.00% 794.6T 100.00% 1.189T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.44% 3.473T 0.27% 3.198G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
200002.09% 16.64T 1.55% 18.48G
200011.23% 9.759T 0.97% 11.51G
200020.76% 6.004T 0.61% 7.243G
163840.74% 5.847T 0.53% 6.296G
19350.71% 5.651T 0.71% 8.434G