Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20071112

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20071112 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 34.60% of octets and 15.98% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.373M 1 10.05M
5 1.461M 8 10.48M
10 1.562M 18 10.95M
50 3.107M 58 17.82M
90 13.10M 59 50.10M
95 25.42M 59 70.80M
99 82.24M 81 167.4M
99.9 277.5M 120 1.051G
99.99 937.9M 163 6.319G
99.999 2.572G 211 7.928G
100 187.2G 239 22.47G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)1.21% 1.825G
Medium (100-1400B)5.90% 8.901G
Large (1401-1500B)90.56% 136.5G
Jumbo (>1500B)2.33% 3.512G
Total100.00% 150.7G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers21.60% 52.60T 24.02% 36.22G 28.06% 2.247M
Encrypted Traffic6.21% 15.11T 7.08% 10.67G 6.34% 507.7k
File Sharing3.63% 8.847T 3.72% 5.608G 2.99% 239.4k
Measurement2.48% 6.034T 2.94% 4.433G 0.29% 22.85k
Advanced Apps2.02% 4.914T 2.25% 3.399G 2.74% 219.5k
Misc0.42% 1.021T 0.85% 1.279G 0.76% 61.19k
Games0.24% 589.4G 0.27% 414.4M 0.36% 29.05k
Audio/Video0.23% 555.9G 0.26% 391.9M 0.52% 41.73k
Unidentified63.18% 153.8T 58.60% 88.35G 57.93% 4.640M
Total100.00% 243.5T 100.00% 150.7G 100.00% 8.009M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
4.073G900043SCXY [14031]Abilene [11537]Iperf
3.610G900012DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf
1.292G900010Unknown [32361]SCXY [14031]Iperf
1.054G150060SCXY [14031]Unknown [17579]Iperf
751.8M150026NYSERNet [3756]Abilene [11537]Iperf
513.9M900060RNP [1916]SCXY [14031]Iperf
195.9M900019Unknown [32361]SWITCH [559]Iperf
189.1M824410SINET [2907]SCXY [14031]Iperf
188.0M150016NASA GSFC [1701]Unknown [25689]Iperf
161.6M150030NASA Internet [297]Unknown [25689]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
4.244G900027SCXY [14031]Abilene [11537]5010 -> 5010
2.107G898218DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]SCXY [14031]1021 -> 988
1.729G892360DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]1021 -> 988
1.024G899410High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]36846 -> 5101
1.003G900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]37983 -> 5101
726.9M150011INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]37999 -> 47557
513.7M150012INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]LATECH [19564]64003 -> 50002
409.9M864659Unknown [32361]SCXY [14031]Audiogalaxy
367.2M149910NASA-AERONET [10343]SCXY [14031]53870 -> 9098
349.6M900049INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]SCXY [14031]1021 -> 988

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 663.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers31.47% 221.5T 39.88% 376.3G
Audio/Video6.90% 48.54T 1.95% 18.36G
Encrypted Traffic4.53% 31.86T 5.12% 48.29G
File Sharing2.87% 20.19T 2.94% 27.71G
Misc2.05% 14.41T 4.28% 40.37G
Advanced Apps1.37% 9.621T 1.18% 11.17G
Measurement1.25% 8.821T 1.35% 12.73G
Games1.23% 8.668T 0.86% 8.125G
Unidentified48.34% 340.3T 42.45% 400.5G
Total100.00% 703.9T 100.00% 943.6G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
NNTP
FTP
Rsync
---
27.91%
1.43%
1.09%
1.03%
---
196.4T
10.09T
7.702T
7.258T
---
36.87%
1.23%
0.96%
0.83%
---
347.8G
11.57G
9.015G
7.852G
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
6.31%
0.50%
0.05%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
44.43T
3.523T
372.6G
118.0G
71.62G
20.42G
3.703G
953.5M
0.000
---
1.20%
0.67%
0.05%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
11.34G
6.293G
445.5M
149.0M
88.53M
32.30M
9.562M
2.946M
0.000
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.49%
1.81%
0.21%
0.01%
0.00%
---
17.53T
12.74T
1.505T
70.65G
5.926G
---
2.35%
2.51%
0.24%
0.01%
0.00%
---
22.14G
23.68G
2.310G
133.0M
21.25M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
BitTorrent
Shoutcast
Hotline
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Blubster
Carracho
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.07%
0.69%
0.45%
0.43%
0.13%
0.08%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.537T
4.849T
3.164T
3.020T
932.7G
550.4G
66.89G
42.83G
16.82G
6.204G
3.589G
1.473G
15.36M
---
0.78%
1.01%
0.55%
0.31%
0.12%
0.13%
0.01%
0.01%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.340G
9.546G
5.178G
2.938G
1.095G
1.214G
109.3M
75.06M
195.2M
11.25M
5.810M
2.487M
24.20k
Misc
Mail
Port 0
DNS
Squid
X11
AFS
Telnet
IRC
NFS
MS Windows
NTP
SOCKS
AOL AIM
IDENT
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
RTIP
---
1.08%
0.35%
0.21%
0.18%
0.09%
0.07%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.577T
2.496T
1.489T
1.248T
610.2G
493.8G
121.5G
114.2G
69.97G
48.73G
43.08G
35.02G
32.03G
21.49G
14.04G
321.3M
43.75M
---
2.00%
0.25%
1.29%
0.23%
0.17%
0.10%
0.04%
0.05%
0.01%
0.05%
0.06%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
18.87G
2.380G
12.14G
2.200G
1.620G
952.2M
381.7M
427.2M
107.4M
434.4M
565.2M
51.66M
58.11M
102.2M
77.67M
2.810M
546.8k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
IBP
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
---
1.23%
0.07%
0.05%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.665T
488.9G
359.3G
72.74G
26.79G
7.937G
---
1.03%
0.06%
0.04%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
---
9.742G
598.4M
388.5M
328.5M
53.27M
62.79M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
1.20%
0.05%
0.00%
---
8.480T
340.9G
0.000
---
0.76%
0.59%
0.00%
---
7.171G
5.563G
0.000
Games
Asheron
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Spy Arcade
Quake
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.80%
0.28%
0.06%
0.05%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
---
5.632T
1.980T
400.4G
321.6G
206.7G
99.85G
25.80G
---
0.10%
0.33%
0.10%
0.26%
0.04%
0.02%
0.00%
---
939.6M
3.100G
988.8M
2.466G
364.9M
224.3M
41.04M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
48.34%
---
340.3T
---
42.45%
---
400.5G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
703.9T
---
100.00%
---
943.6G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.05% 340.9G 0.59% 5.563G
IGMP[2]0.00% 35.88M 0.00% 1.011M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 16.30G 0.01% 132.5M
TCP[6]83.85% 590.2T 86.11% 812.6G
UDP[17]12.76% 89.84T 10.71% 101.0G
IPv6[41]0.00% 22.02G 0.01% 79.33M
GRE[47]3.11% 21.91T 2.31% 21.77G
ESP[50]0.21% 1.505T 0.24% 2.310G
AX.25[93]0.00% 306.1k 0.00% 6.600k
PIM[103]0.00% 3.235G 0.00% 32.83M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 70.77G 0.01% 133.9M
Total100.00% 703.9T 100.00% 943.6G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)45.32% 427.6G
Medium (100-1400B)20.61% 194.4G
Large (1401-1500B)32.30% 304.7G
Jumbo (>1500B)1.78% 16.75G
Total100.00% 943.6G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.45% 678.9T 96.07% 906.5G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.61% 4.264T 0.76% 7.214G
EF [DSCP=46]0.13% 880.1G 0.09% 845.6M
Other2.82% 19.85T 3.08% 29.03G
Total100.00% 703.9T 100.00% 943.6G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.39% 2.752T 0.24% 2.302G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
9883.38% 23.78T 0.41% 3.834G
200003.00% 21.12T 2.23% 21.06G
10212.42% 17.03T 0.29% 2.770G
200011.92% 13.54T 1.41% 13.33G
200020.99% 6.966T 0.72% 6.812G